Front Suspension Help?
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old December 13th, 2007, 11:55 PM   #1
Regular
 
JONJON's Avatar
 
1988 Ford Mustang GT
8.372@82.8 1/8mile w/1.825 60'
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami,FL
Posts: 357
JONJON is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Front Suspension Help?


I am getting 90/10's up front but I am stuck between moroso trick springs or Granatelli coil over.I am getting a good deal on the coil over its just I dont really like coil overs.I have seen them make noise and not stay where you set them.Who has run granatelli coil overs before?Thanks for any help.
__________________
I never thought I would own a mustang!!!
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old December 14th, 2007, 12:52 AM   #2
MM Fanatic
 
Stangzilla's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On my way to Baines's house!!
Posts: 3,298
Stangzilla is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by JONJON View Post
I am getting 90/10's up front but I am stuck between moroso trick springs or Granatelli coil over.I am getting a good deal on the coil over its just I dont really like coil overs.I have seen them make noise and not stay where you set them.Who has run granatelli coil overs before?Thanks for any help.
Well I would never use a coil over on a car that does not have a K-Member and tube control arms. The stock control arm weigh quite a bit more than tube ones. The stock control arms put a lot more pressure on the coil overs and they were really not designed for that extra weight. Notice the top cap and the large threaded tube that goes over the strut is made out of aluminum. The extra pressure put on it will cause it to squeak or make some kind of noise. The noise usually comes from the aluminum cap that fits on the top of the spring. When I put mine together even though I have the K-Member and arms I sprayed a graphite-molybenum dry film lube on the top caps and my coilovers are as quite as can be.. Also if you dont know already if you use coil-overs you will also have to get a set of caster camber plates. I have a set of Strange coil-overs. They are good. I have used D&D before. Never used Granetelli but they should be ok, I guess.. But if you still have stock front control arms I would go with the other springs.. But hey thats just me.. I am sure I will get attacked for this one too!!!!!
__________________
Rotating The Earth 1320 Feet At A Time!!

Today, I found out that when I masturbate at night while watching internet porn I cast a huge shadow on the curtain and the entire street is able to see it.
  Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2007, 01:16 AM   #3
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Coil overs hands down. Those "trick" drag springs are worthless.

The k-member and control arms have nothing to do with the decision of coil overs or not. The factory control arms could weigh 800 pounds more than tubular control arms and it wouldn't matter. The control arm weight is under the spring, regardless of the type of spring or type of control arm. The spring doesn't care how much the control arm weighs because the spring sits on it. If you want to get technical the spring sits on the spindle which sits on the balljoint which is in the control arm. Same thing. The weight that effects the spring is the weight above the spring, the car.

And no that is not an attack. That is an explanation of how the front suspension is designed.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2007, 01:45 AM   #4
MM Fanatic
 
Stangzilla's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: On my way to Baines's house!!
Posts: 3,298
Stangzilla is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Coil overs hands down. Those "trick" drag springs are worthless.

The k-member and control arms have nothing to do with the decision of coil overs or not. The factory control arms could weigh 800 pounds more than tubular control arms and it wouldn't matter. The control arm weight is under the spring, regardless of the type of spring or type of control arm. The spring doesn't care how much the control arm weighs because the spring sits on it. If you want to get technical the spring sits on the spindle which sits on the balljoint which is in the control arm. Same thing. The weight that effects the spring is the weight above the spring, the car.

And no that is not an attack. That is an explanation of how the front suspension is designed.

Is that what un-sprung weight is?
__________________
Rotating The Earth 1320 Feet At A Time!!

Today, I found out that when I masturbate at night while watching internet porn I cast a huge shadow on the curtain and the entire street is able to see it.
  Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2007, 01:50 AM   #5
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
mxnate116's Avatar
 
88 mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 2,883
mxnate116 is a jewel in the roughmxnate116 is a jewel in the roughmxnate116 is a jewel in the roughmxnate116 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

yeah same question as above.

would the control arm be sprung or unsprung weight? is everything under the spring unsprung?


and i dont know it its the same but for motocross i was told unsprung weight is the best place to lose weight. is this true for cars?
  Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2007, 02:01 AM   #6
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by Stangzilla View Post
Is that what un-sprung weight is?
It would technically be unsprung weight because it is under the spring and not supported by the spring. Having a heavier control arm would be similar to having a steel wheel versus an aluminum wheel. Neither is going to effect what spring rate is needed because it is not effecting the load on the spring.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old December 14th, 2007, 02:07 AM   #7
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by mxnate116 View Post
yeah same question as above.

would the control arm be sprung or unsprung weight? is everything under the spring unsprung?


and i dont know it its the same but for motocross i was told unsprung weight is the best place to lose weight. is this true for cars?
I think the best place to lose weight is rotating weight because it has a multiplying effect over dead weight. Experts in this area claim 1 pound of rotating weight is equal to 8 pounds of dead weight. Alot of unsprung weight can cause wheel hop and other issues but when it comes to putting a car on a diet taking weight out anywhere is going to be helpful.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Front Suspension Help?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
front suspension whiteboycustom 5.0 Mustangs 26 February 1st, 2012 12:38 PM
Front Suspension 01dutchGT 99-04 1 December 7th, 2007 03:20 AM
65 Front Suspension? Spiderz Classic Mustangs 11 July 24th, 2007 05:39 PM
Front End Suspension Install... HELP. 88BlueGT 5.0 Mustangs 7 February 28th, 2007 09:42 PM
FR500 front suspension banini Modular Mustangs 0 September 25th, 2006 03:39 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.