[Iownastang]

Originally Posted by White Thunder if i had to guess i would say 1 it was an auto explorer 2 i bet they have crazy drivetrain loss..... 3 i bet the cams suck 4 i bet the CR is pretty low its a suv not a stang i would like to be proved wrong if im wrong....im all about learning

they probably only have like 165 whp

[Darrell]

Originally Posted by Psychojimmy Really? Why did they make less power then my stangs 5.0 with the E7 heads and a intake that flows less? I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just curious. +1.... I wouldn't go quite as far as calling you guys idiots, but his post made perfect sense to me. I wouldn't comment on it, but I see it quite often.

Milder cam and in the mid 90s they changed the way horsepower was rated. Explorer's possibly had lower compression too but I'm not sure.

[Darrell]

Originally Posted by White Thunder if i had to guess i would say 1 it was an auto explorer 2 i bet they have crazy drivetrain loss..... 3 i bet the cams suck 4 i bet the CR is pretty low its a suv not a stang i would like to be proved wrong if im wrong....im all about learning

Manufactures measure horsepower at the flywheel where it is accurate. Dyno queens measure and compare rear wheel numbers.