Which Is A Better Motor The 1994-1995 5.0 Or 1996-1998 4.6

Darren · October 11th, 2006, 11:36 PM

I am looking to buy a mustang and i was wondering which mustang was better to build up on a 1994-1995 5.0 or a 1996-1998 4.6

Bill · October 12th, 2006, 01:38 AM

i never had neither. just the Fox 5.0's and a 2000 GT so i dont have and info or whats better on those years but i just wanted to say Welcome to the site.

Justincredible · October 12th, 2006, 02:23 AM

5.0 is better and cheaper. No contest.

badtzmaru · October 12th, 2006, 10:45 AM

This is a tricky question because modular guys will say that a 4.6l is much better than a pushrod 5.0l and vice versa. I think it depends what you like. In my own opinion, I think pushrods are way easier to work on and aftermarket parts are big, even the junk yards are full of explorers, rangers (5.0's) that you can exchange parts for your 5.0 mustang. That is only my opinion. Good luck on your search and let us know what do you think.

87foxbodylx · October 12th, 2006, 07:42 PM

thought that the 5.0 stopped production after 93?

Bill · October 12th, 2006, 07:53 PM

Originally Posted by 87foxbodylx

thought that the 5.0 stopped production after 93?

nah. 95 model year was the last year for the mustangs 5.0. Ford did use the 5.0's for a few more years or so in the Explorers. im not sure if they used them in anything else tho.

87foxbodylx · October 12th, 2006, 07:58 PM

Originally Posted by Bill

Originally Posted by 87foxbodylx

thought that the 5.0 stopped production after 93?

nah. 95 model year was the last year for the mustangs 5.0. Ford did use the 5.0's for a few more years or so in the Explorers. im not sure if they used them in anything else tho.

was this an add on feature by chance? because i saw a 94 with a 4.6 in it

Jojogunne · October 12th, 2006, 08:08 PM

The 5.0 has the most and cheaper add-ons. However since the 2005 mustang S-197 came out , the mods will be increasing on the 4.6. As far as what you want to do its up to you of course. I have an 84 but love the look of the 99 to 04. Its just not in the budget for me.

jjg

5-0stank · October 12th, 2006, 10:41 PM

Originally Posted by 87foxbodylx

Originally Posted by Bill

Originally Posted by 87foxbodylx

thought that the 5.0 stopped production after 93?

nah. 95 model year was the last year for the mustangs 5.0. Ford did use the 5.0's for a few more years or so in the Explorers. im not sure if they used them in anything else tho.

was this an add on feature by chance? because i saw a 94 with a 4.6 in it

no, it was not an add on feature, it was probably swapped in there...and they used 5.0's in f-150's until 1996

October 11th, 2006, 11:36 PM	#1
Darren Look Ma! My First Post! Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1 iTrader: 0 reviews	Which Is A Better Motor The 1994-1995 5.0 Or 1996-1998 4.6 I am looking to buy a mustang and i was wondering which mustang was better to build up on a 1994-1995 5.0 or a 1996-1998 4.6

October 12th, 2006, 01:38 AM	#2
Bill Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,327 iTrader: 0 reviews	i never had neither. just the Fox 5.0's and a 2000 GT so i dont have and info or whats better on those years but i just wanted to say Welcome to the site. __________________ Too often, We lose sight of life's simple pleasures. Remember, when someone annoys you it takes 42 muscles in your face to frown, BUT, it only take 4 muscles to extend your arm and bitch-slap that Mother@#?!&! upside the head!!

October 12th, 2006, 02:23 AM	#3
Justincredible Enthusiast Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Ky Posts: 523 iTrader: 0 reviews	5.0 is better and cheaper. No contest. __________________ 9.91@ 134mph 1/4 - 6.17@ 109mph 1/8th - 1.33 60' - Stock ECU & Stock Suspension......and getting faster . BIVENS RACE CARS FTMFW!!!

October 12th, 2006, 10:45 AM	#4
badtzmaru Regular 1994 Mustang GT ukn Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: San Diego, CA. Posts: 124 iTrader: 0 reviews	This is a tricky question because modular guys will say that a 4.6l is much better than a pushrod 5.0l and vice versa. I think it depends what you like. In my own opinion, I think pushrods are way easier to work on and aftermarket parts are big, even the junk yards are full of explorers, rangers (5.0's) that you can exchange parts for your 5.0 mustang. That is only my opinion. Good luck on your search and let us know what do you think. __________________ 374RWHP/354TQ Dynotuned by Danny Swanson from SwansonPerformance

October 12th, 2006, 08:08 PM	#8
Jojogunne Regular 1984 GT 13.21@104.61 Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bloomsburg PA Posts: 110 iTrader: 0 reviews	The 5.0 has the most and cheaper add-ons. However since the 2005 mustang S-197 came out , the mods will be increasing on the 4.6. As far as what you want to do its up to you of course. I have an 84 but love the look of the 99 to 04. Its just not in the budget for me. jjg __________________ Eibach Sportsline, Mac, Moroso,Comp Cams,PRW roller rockers, and no money left over.

October 12th, 2006, 07:42 PM	#5
87foxbodylx Enthusiast 1987 Mustang LX 13.9@102.43 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Ephrata PA Posts: 648 iTrader: 0 reviews	thought that the 5.0 stopped production after 93?

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement Advertisement

Threads Similar to: Which Is A Better Motor The 1994-1995 5.0 Or 1996-1998 4.6
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
1994-1995	ponyexpress02	99-04	13	December 20th, 2006 11:17 AM
1996-1998 cobra	ih8chevy	Modular Mustangs	9	December 10th, 2006 05:16 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.