Biggest cam in a stock 5.0? - Page 2
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 5th, 2008, 06:08 PM   #21
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 559
woody1 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Those ford cams are lazy. They were great in the 80's before anyone knew what was really happening with ramp rates and lobes in regards to hyd rollers. Look at some of the junk from Comp, XE series or a TFS Stg 2. Measure PTV clearance and move forward, pretty simple stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old April 5th, 2008, 06:12 PM   #22
Regular
 
MassHole's Avatar
 
2003 Ford Mustang GT Vert
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 89
MassHole is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

the F303 will fit with changes needed. the X303 wont unless you adjust the valve to piston clearence.

that is all :
__________________
Unitedstangs.com New England Chapter
  Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2008, 08:56 PM   #23
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
1987 ford mustang gt
well see when shes done
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mascot, tn
Posts: 5,020
Iownastang will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 1BADSTANG View Post
the abc cams are very outdated. The "b" and "f" are both good cams but their are much better out their now.
duh there are better grinds out there but cam technology is still the same
  Reply With Quote
Old April 5th, 2008, 10:04 PM   #24
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Iownastang View Post
duh there are better grinds out there but cam technology is still the same
No, No, No... A new .512 224* lift cam will make more power than an out dated .512 224*lift cam
  Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2008, 11:00 PM   #25
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by wesbeck632 View Post
Hi, can anybody tell me the cam with the most duration and lift you can fit in a stock 5.0(with stock forged pistons)?I have an f now and am wondering how much bigger i can go. I realize duration is just as an important part as lift with clearance.Do fprd racing z and x cams fit?thanks.
Depends. Valve timing plays a bigger role than anything with valve to piston clearance.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old April 7th, 2008, 11:01 PM   #26
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
No, No, No... A new .512 224* lift cam will make more power than an out dated .512 224*lift cam
Yes, it is very possible. There are many ways to come up with 224 duration which many people don't realize.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 08:46 AM   #27
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1BADSTANG's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,515
1BADSTANG is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Yes, it is very possible. There are many ways to come up with 224 duration which many people don't realize.

  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 05:27 PM   #28
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Yes, it is very possible. There are many ways to come up with 224 duration which many people don't realize.
Ramp, and lobe seperation angles...yes I do understand how cams work. My point is just that a custom grind, just like titanium valves are better. But not a nessessity to 80+% of the members.
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 06:01 PM   #29
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
Ramp, and lobe seperation angles...yes I do understand how cams work. My point is just that a custom grind, just like titanium valves are better. But not a nessessity to 80+% of the members.

Valve timing events produce duration and lobe separation. You can have two cams with the same duration and lift and one will kill the other in horsepower and torque. That was the point I was making. Custom grinds have nothing to do with the point I was making.

Is cam #1 the same as cam #2? The duration and lift are the same so the cams must be the same, right?

Cam #1
IVO-26 IVC-62
EVO-74 EVC-22
Intake duration – 268 @ .050
Exhaust duration – 276 @ .050
Intake lobe lift - .454
Intake lobe lift - .422


Cam #2
IVO-36 IVC-52
EVO-68 EVC-28
Intake duration – 268 @ .050
Exhaust duration – 276 @ .050
Intake lobe lift - .454
Intake lobe lift - .422
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 06:53 PM   #30
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Valve timing events produce duration and lobe separation. You can have two cams with the same duration and lift and one will kill the other in horsepower and torque. That was the point I was making. Custom grinds have nothing to do with the point I was making.

Is cam #1 the same as cam #2? The duration and lift are the same so the cams must be the same, right?

Cam #1
IVO-26 IVC-62
EVO-74 EVC-22
Intake duration – 268 @ .050
Exhaust duration – 276 @ .050
Intake lobe lift - .454
Intake lobe lift - .422


Cam #2
IVO-36 IVC-52
EVO-68 EVC-28
Intake duration – 268 @ .050
Exhaust duration – 276 @ .050
Intake lobe lift - .454
Intake lobe lift - .422
they both have 272 intake duration, and 264 exhaust duration(acording to the top numbers). they are diffrent in the fact cam 1 is on a 112lsa, and 2 is on a 106.
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 07:29 PM   #31
Atomized
 
gotn20's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,370
gotn20 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

now you guys are just showling off
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 07:30 PM   #32
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1BADSTANG's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,515
1BADSTANG is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

hahahhahah
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 07:32 PM   #33
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
they both have 272 intake duration, and 264 exhaust duration(acording to the top numbers). they are diffrent in the fact cam 1 is on a 112lsa, and 2 is on a 106.
No, they both have 268 at @.050 intake and 276 @.050 exhaust duration. Cam 1 lobe separation is 112 and the overlap is 48 degrees. Cam 2 lobe separation is 104 and the overlap is 64 degrees. The valve timing is what makes the difference in power, not the duration or lobe separation.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 07:42 PM   #34
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1BADSTANG's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,515
1BADSTANG is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
No, they both have 268 at @.050 intake and 276 @.050 exhaust duration. Cam 1 lobe separation is 112 and the overlap is 48 degrees. Cam 2 lobe separation is 104 and the overlap is 64 degrees. The valve timing is what makes the difference in power, not the duration or lobe separation.

  Reply With Quote
Old April 8th, 2008, 08:43 PM   #35
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
No, they both have 268 at @.050 intake and 276 @.050 exhaust duration. Cam 1 lobe separation is 112 and the overlap is 48 degrees. Cam 2 lobe separation is 104 and the overlap is 64 degrees. The valve timing is what makes the difference in power, not the duration or lobe separation.
Bad math on my part for the duration. I got your numbers, but the I got 268/276 for the advertised. IDK what the .050 would be. I don't get the point of this tho... By my previous statement I meant two identical cams, as implied. Not too diffrent cams. You added the "not if ....". I do know my way around a cam card if thats what your trying to test.

I understand the performance oriented timing, and the fact that we havent touched the subject of ramp profile, but that was not my point.

My origional point was that 2 exact cams, will make the same power. in the same motor....degreed the same.... dynoed in the same dyno....with the same temperature...with the same humidity...at the same elevation...
  Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2008, 08:57 AM   #36
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by JBIGBOOTSY View Post
Bad math on my part for the duration. I got your numbers, but the I got 268/276 for the advertised. IDK what the .050 would be. I don't get the point of this tho... By my previous statement I meant two identical cams, as implied. Not too diffrent cams. You added the "not if ....". I do know my way around a cam card if thats what your trying to test.

I understand the performance oriented timing, and the fact that we havent touched the subject of ramp profile, but that was not my point.

My origional point was that 2 exact cams, will make the same power. in the same motor....degreed the same.... dynoed in the same dyno....with the same temperature...with the same humidity...at the same elevation...
Timing and duration can be at .050 or seat to seat. In this case it is at .050.

I was commenting on where you said "a new .512 224* lift cam will make more power than an out dated .512 224*lift cam". Yes, it might because it might be a different grind that might have the same duration and lift but in fact be a much different cam. That is the point I was trying to make. Then you commented about ramp and lobe separation angles are used to come up with duration figures which is wrong so I explained it. I wasn't intending on creating a pissing match, I was just explaining how it worked.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2008, 06:16 PM   #37
MM Fanatic
 
JBIGBOOTSY's Avatar
 
1990 LX hatch
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 4,391
JBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really niceJBIGBOOTSY is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Timing and duration can be at .050 or seat to seat. In this case it is at .050.

I was commenting on where you said "a new .512 224* lift cam will make more power than an out dated .512 224*lift cam". Yes, it might because it might be a different grind that might have the same duration and lift but in fact be a much different cam. That is the point I was trying to make. Then you commented about ramp and lobe separation angles are used to come up with duration figures which is wrong so I explained it. I wasn't intending on creating a pissing match, I was just explaining how it worked.
Ok, got ya. I diden't mean that ramp and lobe seperation is how you come up with duration. I was just listing them as things that are important and were not listed in my post about the same cam.
  Reply With Quote
Old April 9th, 2008, 09:43 PM   #38
Regular
 
tehdwarvenn's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Columbia SC
Posts: 301
tehdwarvenn is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to tehdwarvenn
Default

ok guys.. just answer his question straightfoward... if you want a better cam, get a custom grind.

if you want a big cam, go ahead and have the chug, but its not going to run well.
__________________
1993 Mustang GT, catless h-pipe, bbk shorties, 40 series flows, bbk rear suspension, edelbrock front suspension, AUTOLITES!!! =), k&n, underdrives, 3.73's
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Biggest cam in a stock 5.0?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
biggest tire on a stock 17 RedStangGT 99-04 23 August 19th, 2010 07:36 PM
Biggest tire flamed 98 gt 5.0 Mustangs 7 October 25th, 2007 12:09 PM
Biggest Wheelsize for a 88-93 GT Nociznice 5.0 Mustangs 7 March 21st, 2007 08:19 PM
What is the Biggest cam with 202 valves on stock pistons Kevin b 5.0 Mustangs 7 January 3rd, 2007 12:21 AM
my biggest turn on sAJ1420 Multimedia 9 September 18th, 2005 09:48 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.