Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

Discussing Destroying Dyno Myths... 56K Beware! in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. Originally Posted by CAMN89GT Some of those make some pretty good power for what it ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old February 15th, 2008, 12:12 AM   #21
Banned
 
MEMBER #334
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wyandotte County
Posts: 1,635
Default

Originally Posted by CAMN89GT View Post
Some of those make some pretty good power for what it is.
not to get off-topic but CAMN89GT, why are you using a pic of my '89 in your sig?
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old February 17th, 2008, 08:42 PM   #22
Zippee is my step sister.
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
Default

Originally Posted by stangfreak View Post
not to get off-topic but CAMN89GT, why are you using a pic of my '89 in your sig?


Holy ownage!!!!!!!!


He is a poser, that's why.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft

My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
 
Old March 6th, 2008, 12:37 AM   #23
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
Default

nice car


love that color
 
Old March 14th, 2008, 03:08 PM   #24
Regular
 
87 'Stang
13.1@105
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tarpon Springs, FL, USA
Posts: 56
Default

Good info. I'm running a stock short block w/the Holley Systemax kit and F cam and my dyno figures are what Holley advertises w/their kit.
 
Old April 2nd, 2008, 01:34 PM   #25
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
91cobra5.0's Avatar
 
91 mustang
Unknown with new heads
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: colorado springs
Posts: 1,579
Default

I hear dynojets are not accurate? True or false?
__________________

Fender well cold air intake, 3:73's, eibach springs, 65mm TB, electric fans, 3g upgrade, smog delete, advanced timing, MSD cap and rotor, ford racing 9mm plug wires, 75mm Pro-M MAF, flowmaster sieres 40 delta flows, gt-40 heads
 
Old April 2nd, 2008, 01:54 PM   #26
Zippee is my step sister.
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
Default

Originally Posted by 91cobra5.0 View Post
I hear dynojets are not accurate? True or false?
All chassis dynos vary based on many variables. Chassis dynos are a nice tuning piece provided no variables change during the tuning session. On a chassis dyno you can have X number of horsepower today and come back tomorrow and the number can be way different. Its not limited to Dynojet or any other specific chassis dyno, its all of them.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft

My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
 
Old June 4th, 2008, 04:19 AM   #27
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Default

sick!
 
Old June 8th, 2008, 04:24 PM   #28
Regular
 
1993 mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 78
Default

Nice info. Think about it, they are testing each mod on a bone stock 5.0 by themselves. Mods work with other mods.

Metaphor from a similar post: "It's like being naked and going out in the cold; just socks, Freezing; just underwear, freezing; just a jacket, freezing; etc. But ware all of those things at the same time, now you are very warm and comfortable." Get it?
__________________
 
Old June 8th, 2008, 05:12 PM   #29
Zippee is my step sister.
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
Default

Originally Posted by 50fanatic View Post
Nice info. Think about it, they are testing each mod on a bone stock 5.0 by themselves. Mods work with other mods.

Metaphor from a similar post: "It's like being naked and going out in the cold; just socks, Freezing; just underwear, freezing; just a jacket, freezing; etc. But ware all of those things at the same time, now you are very warm and comfortable." Get it?
So you are implying that a set of underdrive pullies will add more horsepower on an engine that has a set of Trick Flow heads on it than they will on engine with stock heads? False. That is true for some parts that are designed to work together but not for simple things like underdrive pullies and such.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft

My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
 
Old June 8th, 2008, 05:31 PM   #30
Regular
 
1993 mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 78
Default

That's what I meant. Bolt-ons like heads, intake, exhaust.
__________________

Last edited by 50fanatic : June 8th, 2008 at 05:35 PM.
 
Old June 8th, 2008, 05:42 PM   #31
Zippee is my step sister.
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
Default

Originally Posted by 50fanatic View Post
That's what I meant. Bolt-ons like heads, intake, exhaust.
I see you edited the part about being flamed but I will respond to it anyway. You got flamed in that other thread because you were wrong, not because you weren't specific. Same thing in this case. Underdrive pulleys don't care what heads are on the car or what intake is on the car. A camshaft however does. So yes you are correct in regards to parts of the over all combination that are designed to work together but other items like underdrive pulleys are not effected by other parts.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft

My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
 
Old June 8th, 2008, 05:45 PM   #32
Regular
 
1993 mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 78
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
I see you edited the part about being flamed but I will respond to it anyway. You got flamed in that other thread because you were wrong, not because you weren't specific. Same thing in this case. Underdrive pulleys don't care what heads are on the car or what intake is on the car. A camshaft however does. So yes you are correct in regards to parts of the over all combination that are designed to work together but other items like underdrive pulleys are not effected by other parts.
I'd noticed that. That's why I deleted the part about getting flamed. I understand. Under drive pulleys work by themselves, not with other mods, like you mentioned.
__________________
 
Old July 31st, 2008, 06:03 PM   #33
Regular
 
92hatchback's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: macomb
Posts: 144
Default

i have that book too... a kid at my work sold his stang and just gave it to me
 
Old August 13th, 2008, 10:07 AM   #34
Newbie
 
ocd_stang's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Noblesville,In
Posts: 11
Default

Great Info....


Originally Posted by Darrell View Post


























THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND RESURCH ,I WILL MAKE SOME CHANGES TO MY SET UP...
JASON
 
Old September 3rd, 2008, 08:12 AM   #35
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
Default

Goin go out right now


Thanks for the info I'm going to go out right now and buy some parts...









<a href="http://bambam86.21butrich.hop.clickbank.net"><img src="http://www.21butrich.com/img/banner2.gif" width="468" height="60"></a>
 
Old October 14th, 2008, 05:50 PM   #36
Newbie
 
Blown347's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Default

good post
 
Old January 30th, 2009, 09:54 PM   #37
Banned
 
87 stang + 97 ranger
both combined i can't break 15 secs.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Somewhere in Cbus OH
Posts: 476
Default

Good info.

Looks like Chineese to me though.
 
Old March 4th, 2009, 12:25 PM   #38
Regular
 
1993 mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 78
Default

How come one mustang did better with 1.7 roller rockers, while the other one did worse?
__________________
 
Old March 4th, 2009, 12:54 PM   #39
Regular
 
chriswao's Avatar
 
1989 mustang gt
8th 5.70
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: savannah
Posts: 198
Default

nice info man puts alot of guessing to rest
 
Old August 24th, 2009, 03:45 PM   #40
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Very nice data!!!
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Destroying Dyno Myths... 56K Beware!
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top 8 Traffic ticket myths Luis_GT The Clubhouse 2 August 21st, 2007 06:55 PM
Thieves Beware wv_horse_trader 5.0 Mustangs 14 May 8th, 2007 09:08 AM
But would I do it again??? (56k beware) Timber The Clubhouse 9 April 19th, 2007 09:10 PM
Terminator destroying modded srt-4 PureVolume707 Videos 12 March 27th, 2007 08:32 PM
Destroying A Myth, Backpreasure Sa-WaitNoMustang900Turbo Exhaust 30 November 11th, 2006 06:42 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.