![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing vortech T-trim VS S-trim in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. Just wondering what power difference they make. If there both running 15 pounds of boost ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1989 mustang LX
11.42 @120
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 125
|
vortech T-trim VS S-trim
Just wondering what power difference they make. If there both running 15 pounds of boost does the T-trim make more power if so about how much more.
__________________
89 hatch.....4,000 dollars..vortech supercharger kit.....3,800 dollars...built 306 windsor motor.....3,000 dollars beating a 75,000 dollar z06 corvette....PRICELESS |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 mustang
266 ftlbs 191 hp (15.138 @92.91) @5000ft elevation
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: colorado springs
Posts: 1,494
|
i think one is quiet and the other isnt
__________________
![]() Fender well cold air intake, 3:73's, eibach springs, 65mm TB, electric fans, 3g upgrade, smog delete, advanced timing, MSD cap and rotor, ford racing 9mm plug wires, 75mm Pro-M MAF, flowmaster sieres 40 delta flows |
|
|
#3 |
|
MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky
Posts: 16,395
|
The T-Trim can run alot more boost...It is less efficient at low boost but shines at higher boost...
The S-Trim cant run as much boost...It is more efficient at low boost but not higher boost.... I run a T-Trim on mine... The T-Trim is loud as hell too... |
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 3,766
|
At 15 PSI the only difference will be the outlet temperature (i.e. how hot the blower heats the air up to get to 15 PSI). However, there is no way to determine the efficiency of a given blower at 15 PSI, without considering the restriction (i.e. engine). On smaller motors the S-trim could be more efficient at 15 PSI and on larger/freer flowing motors the T-trim could be more efficient. You'll have to look at compressor maps and the type of motor it is going on to figure out which will work better for your application. If that is too much, call vortech and ask them.
__________________
89 LX 515 hp 497 ftlbs 11.3 @ 125 mph 88 GT 11.4 @ 118
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Secret In The Works
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Relocated Back To Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 2,038
|
Just curious. Are we comparing the V1 T-trim, to the V1 S-trim? Or the V1T, to the V2S?
Ryan > Well said bro.
__________________
Definition of Fast? ![]() I'd say thats good enough. ![]() NMRA Outlaw 10.5 Season Opener 2008 Photo courtesy of - Yours Truly |
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
1989 mustang LX
11.42 @120
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 125
|
v1-t to the v1 -trim
__________________
89 hatch.....4,000 dollars..vortech supercharger kit.....3,800 dollars...built 306 windsor motor.....3,000 dollars beating a 75,000 dollar z06 corvette....PRICELESS |
|
|
#7 |
|
MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky
Posts: 16,395
|
At 30#'s the S-Trim has no chance of the efficiency of the T-Trim at the same boost level...
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
1989 LX Vert - 1993 Notch
Fast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 346
|
It's not "Boost Levels" ............ it's CFM flow.
Boost is NOT a measure of air flow. It's a measure of "back pressure" to airflow. Picking the right S/C comes down to how many CFM's a given engine size will need at a given boost level and rpm. Basically the S-trim will not supply enough CFM for bigger cubic inch engines running a good amount of boost or smaller engines running insane amounts of boost. The CFM flow for a given engine at a give boost level is pretty easy to figure out. We can go into how to run the math and read compressor maps if you want but thats almost a whole thread in and of itself.
__________________
![]() The last President elected in anger of previous President was ....... Jimmy Carter God Help Us |
|
|
#9 |
|
MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky
Posts: 16,395
|
I know that boost is just a level of back pressure...I am just saying...The S-Trim shits out at around 600rwhp...
Last edited by ChrisJ : May 31st, 2008 at 01:50 PM. |
|
|
#10 |
|
MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky
Posts: 16,395
|
S-Trim
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
1989 mustang LX
11.42 @120
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 125
|
thanks for the info guys
__________________
89 hatch.....4,000 dollars..vortech supercharger kit.....3,800 dollars...built 306 windsor motor.....3,000 dollars beating a 75,000 dollar z06 corvette....PRICELESS |
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
|
that 11 second quarter mile in your sig BLOWN, is that just with the 306 and no power adders?
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 3,766
|
Ahhh, but 600 hp on a 2 liter engine could be a lot more than 30 PSI.
__________________
89 LX 515 hp 497 ftlbs 11.3 @ 125 mph 88 GT 11.4 @ 118
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky
Posts: 16,395
|
But we are not talking about a 2 liter engine here though...
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Secret In The Works
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Relocated Back To Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 2,038
|
Since when is "boost" a level, or measure of backpressure?
__________________
Definition of Fast? ![]() I'd say thats good enough. ![]() NMRA Outlaw 10.5 Season Opener 2008 Photo courtesy of - Yours Truly |
|
|
#16 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 3,766
|
Always? You are measuring the build up of pressure in the intake that the car cannot consume.
But in reality it isn't that simple, because the higher the pressure in the intake, the more air that is forced into the motor. Obviously a motor will produce more power at 15 PSI than at 10 PSI, so part of that extra 5 PSI is being consumed. You probably need some advanced algorithms and calculus to really understand how boost effects power output from different compressors and engines.
__________________
89 LX 515 hp 497 ftlbs 11.3 @ 125 mph 88 GT 11.4 @ 118
|
|
|
#17 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 3,766
|
The OP didn't specify, he could have a 4-banger.
__________________
89 LX 515 hp 497 ftlbs 11.3 @ 125 mph 88 GT 11.4 @ 118
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Secret In The Works
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Relocated Back To Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 2,038
|
*Shakes head*
![]() I think your mis-understanding my question bro.
__________________
Definition of Fast? ![]() I'd say thats good enough. ![]() NMRA Outlaw 10.5 Season Opener 2008 Photo courtesy of - Yours Truly |
|
|
#19 |
|
MuchCoolerThanGTsetGO
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shepherdsville, Kentucky
Posts: 16,395
|
In his sig
built 306 windsor motor |
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
1989 mustang LX
11.42 @120
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 125
|
the 11 sec pass I with the supercharger at 7lbs of boost.
__________________
89 hatch.....4,000 dollars..vortech supercharger kit.....3,800 dollars...built 306 windsor motor.....3,000 dollars beating a 75,000 dollar z06 corvette....PRICELESS |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: vortech T-trim VS S-trim
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| vortech jt trim... | mystang0673 | 99-04 | 2 | March 25th, 2008 09:15 PM |
| vortech s trim | flattusmaximus78 | V6 Mustangs | 9 | October 12th, 2007 10:40 AM |
| New Vortech S-Trim | MSTGGT00 | For Sale | 2 | July 11th, 2007 09:48 AM |
| v1 s trim vortech | stoes | Poweradders | 7 | March 29th, 2007 12:04 AM |
| I need Help with a Vortech S-trim | 02ponypackage | V6 Mustangs | 67 | January 10th, 2007 06:41 AM |