| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
87 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 1,220
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
351w 302 question
Question is I heard the blocks were the same block just heads are different deck height. But then in another thread someone said the 351w block can handle more power than the 302. Is this true and if they are the same block then how?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
1992 mustang Lx
13.4@ 106
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 569
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i'm pretty sure they aren't the same block, because when doing a swap you have to change out things like intake, flywheel and oil pan. They are just similar.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1989 LX Vert - 1993 Notch
Fast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 398
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Think of the 351W as the big brother to the 302.
They are very similar. They have same lower mounting points and dimensions i.e. bellhousing bolt patter, motor mount location, ect ect. The deck height is taller on the 351 giving it a longer stroke and more cubes This spreads the heads apart and up a little, so lower intakes are wider. Heads are interchangeable, but the 302 use 7/16 head bolts and the 351 use 1/2" Stock for stock the 351W block is a good deal stronger than the 302. The crank and rods are stonger and the casting on the block itself is beefier in several places. The 351W is about 3" taller over all and weighs about 100lbs more.
__________________
![]() The last President elected in anger of previous President was ....... Jimmy Carter God Help Us Last edited by r.barn; May 30th, 2008 at 06:25 PM. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: shimmy shack takeout
Posts: 1,084
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
the web is a ton better on the 351...the engine will sit taller but with a set of vert motor mounts will help that
__________________
EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO MY OPINION:cool: 6'ers are for kids 1965 chevelle SS 421 sbc 6 speed, 3.90 gears,alum d-shaft, brodix heads,roller cam,925 AED carb...grocery getter*[COLOR="Red"]RIP[/COLOR]* |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
and b oth sexy lol
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: shimmy shack takeout
Posts: 1,084
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
dude did you get booted from MF?
__________________
EVERYONE IS ENTITLED TO MY OPINION:cool: 6'ers are for kids 1965 chevelle SS 421 sbc 6 speed, 3.90 gears,alum d-shaft, brodix heads,roller cam,925 AED carb...grocery getter*[COLOR="Red"]RIP[/COLOR]* |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
87 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 1,220
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
interesting...thanks for the tidbits of info
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang LX
10.98@126.7 NA
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 698
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Two different blocks altogether. Deck height refers to the distance from the crank centerline to the top of the deck (cylinder bore). There are several variations even in 351 and 302s.
__________________
Never fast enough.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Newbie
|
damn r.barn you got a 351 twin turbo...shit must screwww, run any times?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 351w 302 question
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 289 and 351W heads on a 302 block? | delgadog | 94-95 | 3 | June 2nd, 2008 11:02 PM |
| 302 351w | notsoslow50 | 5.0 Mustangs | 6 | July 26th, 2007 12:14 AM |
| 351w with a 302 crank? | 68351w | Classic Mustangs | 4 | July 4th, 2007 12:29 PM |
| 302/347 or 351W | OTreborO | 5.0 Mustangs | 33 | December 22nd, 2006 11:10 PM |
| 302 or 351w? | lugthug713 | 94-95 | 5 | November 29th, 2006 02:07 PM |