| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Short Tubes vs Long Tube in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. hey guys im planning on buying a pair of headers, my friends has a good ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
|
Short Tubes vs Long Tube
hey guys im planning on buying a pair of headers, my friends has a good price of 300$ cdn for a pair for ceramic coated short tubes.. i know long tubes are better but i cant afford them lol low budget... i was wondering if anyone knew the main differences between short and long tube headers performance wise and sound.. thanks guys
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
|
from my understanding short tubes deliver almost stock horsepower and they sound a lil bit less agressive
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
|
im looking on the net and i cant find much.....
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
|
kk i learned that short tubes make more power with anything below 350hp which isnt bad concidering im going to be stock.. it pull 185 to the wheels with the short tubes not bad...
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
|
185 at the wheels, what do you have? And it would be a good idea to save money if u want sound and performance, it would be well worth it. you will put the shorties on and most likely not feel that much of a difference and then want long tubes. no since in doing the work twice, but if you want shorties, then go for it man!
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
|
Do a search and you will find we just discussed this topic. Aftermarket shorties don't make any more power than stock shorties. That has been proven on a dyno. Don't waste your money on shorties.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: grand prairie tx
Posts: 385
|
yeh longtubes are the way to go.. i wish tht i would hav gotten them instead of shorties but o well....
__________________
89 gt 3.73 gears, full exhaust, holley system max2 intake manifold, 70mm throttle body, jet chip |
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 291
|
another vote here for longtubes
__________________
Previous and Current Rides: 1967 Ford Mustang Coupe 2002 Ford Mustang GT--SOLD! 1967 Ford Fairlane 500 XL--SOLD! 2003 Ford Mustang Cobra 1 of 308--SOLD!! 2003 Kawasaki Mean Streak--SOLD!! 2006 Harley Davidson Screamin' Eagle V-Rod |
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stafford,VA
Posts: 88
|
longtubes
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
|
Does anyone know where there is some information about shorties not making more horsepower than the stock exhaust manifolds?
to be more specific im looking for dyno runs testing longtube and shorties |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 639
|
Damn I am bored today, bet ya couldn't tell ![]() Future Post Whore in the making..........................
__________________
"Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" Rev. Jim Jones |
||
|
|
#13 | |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
|
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Danville, Pa.
Posts: 244
|
My BBK 1 5/8 shorties are waaaaay better than ANY stock set of shorty headers. They are mandrel bent and have larger pipes. Yes, longtubes make more power but PLEASE don't claim shorties don't make any more power than stock ones. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
|
how much HP did you gain. if its 5 HP, that is little to none.
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Danville, Pa.
Posts: 244
|
I didn't have it dynoed but I've seen guys running 11's with shorties.
Shorties generally make more mid to upper power and longtubes usually make more lower end power.......as a rule of thumb. I'm not saying it's gospel or written in stone though but just as a rule of thumb. |
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
|
yeah, you could run 11s with a stock exhaust too. I think what the people including myself, who have voted for longtubes, are just saying that the power, sound, and overall performance of longtubes is better than shorties. Plus, why do all the work for shorties, find out you hate it, then do all the work again. I have never heard of anyone not liking their longtubes after they install them. i am not hating on shorties, i just think that longtubes are the way to go.
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Danville, Pa.
Posts: 244
|
Longtubes are not for EVERY engine. For instance, they would do little or nothing for a stock engine with stock exhaust.
When you say a car can run 11's with stock exhaust, that all depends on what size pipes are stock to begin with. How many cars with 2inch exhaust do you see run 11's (without any power adders)? I agree with nine-dee coupe said above and from what I've seen at the track, it's pretty much consistant with that statement. I hope this message board isn't like another one I visit often, where there is a standard answer for nearly every question about an engine build. Over there, the only way to build is: a CUSTOM cam, ALUMINUM heads and to stroke the engine! Just because I'm a "newbie" on here doesn't mean I don't have any knowledge. It just means I've only started to post recently. |
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
|
you didnt say the car couldnt have a power adder....
And hey man, i may have 500+ posts, but i am a newbie as well. I am a 19 year old kid who doesnt know much about engines. And I appreciate most things when i see them, even a chevy or two! But it would be hard to run a stock exhaust with long tubes because the midpipe wouldnt fit. And i do agree with you 100% about you or anyone only having a handful of posts. You have knowledge and it doesnt matter if you have 1000 posts or 10 posts. Just because you just joined doesnt discredit your knowledge on these fine cars. have a good stay on this site. |
|
|
#20 |
|
"Slow Ass Car"
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 19,715
|
You cant run longtube headers with a stock exhaust anyways...The stock mid-pipe will not work with the longtubes without modification...
Alot of guys on this site are not newbies...Posts dont mean $hit in all reality... But there are proven gains of longtubes over shorties...Its not opinion its fact... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Short Tubes vs Long Tube
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Long tube vs short tube headers Pros and cons | cams-shelbycobra07 | Exhaust | 3 | July 16th, 2007 08:41 PM |
| short tube or long tube headers? | ishyton4bangers | V6 Mustangs | 6 | July 16th, 2007 01:37 PM |
| Short or Long tube? | D-Brow | Exhaust | 4 | May 17th, 2007 04:03 AM |
| short tube vs long tube | Mustang RacR94 | V6 Mustangs | 17 | February 26th, 2007 12:42 AM |
| Long Tube/ short tube | OTreborO | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | June 15th, 2006 04:21 PM |