| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
383w thinking of 'carbing it???
Ok, so here is my dilemma...the car runs good, spanks ls powered cars pretty easily, but I know that I am leaving a LOT on the table with my weak induction/cam combo. I would guestimate this combo is prolly puting down about 410-425 to the rears max right now, but it is just a guess.
The current combo is as follows: Eddy Performer RPM EFI w/ pro products lowwer port matched to 1262r(whew, that was a lot of grinding!),nx282hr comp cam(hydraulic roller), 75mm throttle body, 30lb injectors, 80mm maf, standard bbk in fender cai, a9l with series 2 pms and wide band, running 34* total at wot( all in at 2200 wot) and 13.5-12.5 a/f. To upgrade to anything bigger will set me back 7-8 bills(90mm,spyder,etc)....... should I just sell/trade this efi crap off and carb it and swap in a solid roller and see what it does? I know that it will improve, but just not sure if it would be enough to justify the swap/conversion. the rest of the combo is TFS R heads(205cc), 383 w/11:1 compression, built t-5, 3.73's, and no accessories but alternator and water pump. car is about 3300 with me in it. I am looking to put it in the 6's and don't really think it will do it on motor right now. It might be close, but I want solid 6's on motor out of her. I am not concerned about driveability, cause I love driving a wicked car, and can tolerate a lot. Just post up ur opinions, and I will listen.
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 531
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
300-400 bucks on a custom ground cam... I am also considering going to what you stated 90mm, spyder intake... but I will have to upgrade my 30# injectors to 42# and get another hood... the reason I say a custom ground cam is they can work wonders... I went through Jay at camshaft innovations... even if you decide not to go with a custom cam filling out a build sheet and talking to him to see the best way to get you where you want can never hurt
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
ya, but I am still stuck with a sh!tty intake, and can sell this stuff off and get the carb, intake,dizzy,springs, and a cam and prolly still have cash left over. just thinkin out loud, and poking around for advice, know what I mean?
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 531
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
tru... it might workout better with the carb setup
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
get you a nice proforms carb
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
1983 mustang lx
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 504
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i like the quickfuel carbs but right now i have an edelbrock
barry grant carburators are really nice too |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
so you guys say dump the efi? the more I think on it the more I think it would benifit me, and be easier to make powa.
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
That T5 isn't going to live long behind that monster.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
that is what i initially thought, so i had it g-forced(the trans)...what do you think i should go with for a cam darrell? you are the one I was hoping to see post up in here for me cause I HAVE SEEN THE VIDS!! not that I dont care or appreciate allthe other posters, but it is kinda obvious that u know what you are talkin about. is the vic efi better than the tfs r products?
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 417
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I love the billet proform 950's and a good vic jr.....I think it really cleans and simplifies the engine bay... good luck either way
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
thanks, gonna mull it over a while I guess.
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
thanks for taking the time to answer... I guess I should just send jay some money and let him do his thing then. So you do think I should swap out these springs and cam and swap in a solid roller though? I know a hr cam leaves a lot under the curve that a solid will utilize....just not sure if it is enough to justify the cash. I guess that I just need to save a little bit of cash up.
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 531
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If you dont want to mess with valve lash then HR is best... but it would be better to get the SR...
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
ok, I just got a tfs r intake from a buddy, I talked him into going carb and saeeing who's car is gonna break more
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Holy Crap! I just cant believe the difference in runner sizes between the tfs r intake and this performer rpm. I would say alt leat 30-40 % LARGER. no joke, that much....
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Did you get the box or the standard R-series? Either way it will be an improvement over your RPM intake.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
just the r series, not the box, I am leaving now for a test drive.........
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
1989 lx convertible
10.87 @ 128 ( old 302 combo)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mt Juliet,TN
Posts: 277
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
well, it is not as strong from idle to 3k, but it def pulls higher, I had the light set for 6150 before, and I rolled right through that on my test drive cause it was still pulling. not sure where it pulled to, I was too busy listening and 'feeling'. it has a diferent sound when you blip the throttle now too, not as raspy as it was. I guess that is good for my neighbors though...it just sounds mellow, but still revs nice.
__________________
A bigger motor with a lot of parts they said would make me go faster...... |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/5-0-mustangs/79115-383w-thinking-carbing.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| 383w thinking of 'carbing it??? | This thread | Refback | July 7th, 2008 09:06 AM | |
Threads Similar to: 383w thinking of 'carbing it???
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Also, now that I am thinking about it.. | Dawgfude03GT | 99-04 | 4 | May 4th, 2008 01:10 AM |
| i was thinking | 40thmustanggt | 99-04 | 11 | March 1st, 2008 01:22 AM |
| Just thinking I wish | WAR-PARTY | The Clubhouse | 2 | February 14th, 2008 11:53 PM |
| Carbing a 92 mustang | Hourofpain | 2.3 Mustangs | 4 | April 20th, 2007 04:58 PM |
| Distributors For Carbing' An 88' GT | Mr_Evil | 5.0 Mustangs | 10 | November 17th, 2006 07:51 PM |