| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
egr spacer with bigger throttle body
hey guys.
I've got a 70mm bbk throttle body i want to install on my 89 gt. it seems as though the EGR spacer is only 60mm or so. should i bore it out? i've got access to a hone that will work. i was also gonna plug up the coolant lines running to the spacer. is this a good idea?
__________________
- '90 Mustang LX-Sold "Debbie" - '89 Mustang GT- Deceased "Lucy" - '91 Mustang GT-70,000 mi "The Unicorn" |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
if you dont have heads or anything major done that tb is gona slow your car down, gona lose a shit ton of low end
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
|
hmmmm... i was told 70mm would be ok on stock. should i wait till i get an intake or cam? is it seriously gonna be that bad on a stock motor? what if i were to put that and an explorer intake on? would that be any better??
__________________
- '90 Mustang LX-Sold "Debbie" - '89 Mustang GT- Deceased "Lucy" - '91 Mustang GT-70,000 mi "The Unicorn" |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
1989 ford mustang lx 5.0
lets find out?
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 7
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
70mm sucks on a stock mustang.. u lose a crap load of low end torque. 65 is tha biggest you want to use. if you have any decent mods ...than thats the way to go.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i noticed losing lowend when i just put my 65mm on, just wait till you do heads
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
1992 Lx
11.39@119.24
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Az
Posts: 11,644
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
[QUOTE=93mustank;2577445]We speed tested my right arm for quickness in shifts... So he could design the cam for proper shift recovery.[/QUOTE] |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
A bigger throttle body on a stock 5 liter is a waste of money and will do more harm than good. As far as boring the spacer, I'm not sure if you can or not without running into problems. I don't know if all of them are cast the same or if there are changes in the casting to accomadate the bigger bore. If it was me I would buy the correct spacer or eliminator plate instead of trying to rig something up. Do not plug the coolant lines if you are using an EGR plate. The coolant lines are there to cool off the EGR plate, why would you want to remove them?
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: egr spacer with bigger throttle body
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| throttle body spacer | nslinky | 2.3 Mustangs | 5 | August 7th, 2010 09:55 PM |
| Is a bigger throttle body a bad thing? | energiesource | 99-04 | 26 | September 22nd, 2007 04:39 PM |
| throttle body spacer | JASonic | The Clubhouse | 11 | July 18th, 2007 08:46 PM |
| Throttle Body Spacer.... | Mystry | 96-98 | 5 | July 29th, 2006 12:05 AM |