Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Timeslips Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

Discussing 86 GT - Good / Bad To Start With? in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. There's an '86 GT near me FS. I haven't checked it out yet ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old November 17th, 2006, 12:39 AM   #1
Regular
 
Mazlem's Avatar
 
1984 GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central NY State
Posts: 60
Default

86 GT - Good / Bad To Start With?


There's an '86 GT near me FS. I haven't checked it out yet but it sounds stock from the description.

From what I've read, the heads hinder it's performance, the throttle-body is smaller, and it's got the speed-density air instead of mass air. That said, is it really any worse of a year to start with for mods? The 1/4mi times look about the same for similar years. For any other year tho, I'd want to upgrade the throttle-body and intake manifold anyway; maybe not the heads, at least initially.

My short-term goal would be 250HP, long-term of 275-300 if that's possible without getting into blowers an such.
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old November 17th, 2006, 12:54 AM   #2
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
Default

of course its possible. go for it!
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:01 AM   #3
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Danville, Pa.
Posts: 244
Default

The only thing that sucks about that year, besides the heads, as you mentioned is the fact the pistons are flat tops without any valve reliefs.
That means you are pretty much stuck with that cam, unless you flycut the pistons or get different ones.
There aren't too many changes you can do before have to switch to mass air.
You could probably get away with some headers, 2.5 inch exhaust and pulleys. I'm not sure about swapping intakes if the computer would like that or not. It might just be easier to find a car with mass air since you plan on making more hp later on because at some point you will need a mass air conversion....something to think about.
__________________
1982 GT (t-top)
351w(.060),10:3, ported & polished iron heads, 1.94/1.60 valves, BBK shorties & flowmasters, 274XE cam, stealth intake, mallory dizzy, stealth intake, 750dp, Edge 3700 stall converter, C-4, 4:10's
Best E.T 12.85@102mph
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:07 AM   #4
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
Default

there are some posts in this forum about mass air conversions. If you get the whole set up, its pretty easy.

But if you dont want to do all the work, then try to find a 87-93 foxbody.
The aftermarket for these 5.0s is crazy..and the HP possibilities for these are numerous. You can find anything for the 87-93 on the web if you look hard enough.
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:12 AM   #5
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
95opal's Avatar
 
95 opalfrost gt
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,165
Default

Re: 86 GT - good/bad to start with?


Originally Posted by Mazlem
From what I've read, the heads hinder it's performance, the throttle-body is smaller, and it's got the speed-density air instead of mass air. That said, is it really any worse of a year to start with for mods?
NA I think your pretty much looking at the blacksheep of the family as far as performance friendly foxs. was ford thinking about in 86 thats what I want to know. Actually now that i think about it, they seemed to have had a brain fart in 76, 86, 96.
__________________
<a href=http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic3130_1.gif target=_blank>http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...gpic3130_1.gif</a>
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:20 AM   #6
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
Default

what happened in 76?
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:37 AM   #7
Regular
 
Mazlem's Avatar
 
1984 GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central NY State
Posts: 60
Default

The Mustang II?

So it sounds like I'd want to change to mass-air first thing, then new heads and probably intake manifold at the same time. That'd be worth what, 30HP?

Can I get heads better than the stock 87-93 Mustang or Explorer without breaking the bank? Or should I just get heads/intake from a junker, (all-explorer stuff for maybe 20-25HP?)
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:38 AM   #8
Banned
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 3,833
Default

how much bank do you want to spend?
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:47 AM   #9
Regular
 
Mazlem's Avatar
 
1984 GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central NY State
Posts: 60
Default

I haven't looked up any prices; I guess the question is what are the best bang-for-buck heads that provide say, ~10HP over stock for '87-'93.
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:54 AM   #10
"Slow Ass Car"
 
ChrisJ's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
SLOW
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 19,715
Default

1986 Gt is my favorite GT...

I got 4-Eye love...

Its a decent platform to start off with...But it is the first year of Fuel Injection for the GT so there are some bugs...

Do a MAF conversion and it will alot better...
__________________

www.myspace.com/cjobe

 
Old November 17th, 2006, 02:28 AM   #11
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisJ
1986 Gt is my favorite GT...

I got 4-Eye love...

Its a decent platform to start off with...But it is the first year of Fuel Injection for the GT so there are some bugs...

Do a MAF conversion and it will alot better...
+1. i love the 86 GT the most out of all the Fox years.
__________________
Too often, We lose sight of life's simple pleasures. Remember, when someone annoys you it takes 42 muscles in your face to frown, BUT, it only take 4 muscles to extend your arm and bitch-slap that Mother@#?!&! upside the head!!
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 02:30 AM   #12
Zippee is my step sister.
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
Default

Re: 86 GT - good/bad to start with?


Originally Posted by Mazlem
There's an '86 GT near me FS. I haven't checked it out yet but it sounds stock from the description.

From what I've read, the heads hinder it's performance, the throttle-body is smaller, and it's got the speed-density air instead of mass air. That said, is it really any worse of a year to start with for mods? The 1/4mi times look about the same for similar years. For any other year tho, I'd want to upgrade the throttle-body and intake manifold anyway; maybe not the heads, at least initially.

My short-term goal would be 250HP, long-term of 275-300 if that's possible without getting into blowers an such.

Like 82GT mentioned, the pistons are the major drawback in 1986. Not a big deal though. You have a few options. Flycut the stock pistons, buy some replacements or get a 1987 - 1993 short block from a salvage yard. Your horsepower goal is attainable, even without converting to mass air. Throttle bodies, intakes, heads, headers, etc can all be changed on a speed density car. Chips can be burned as well. Camshafts are about the only thing that makes a factory speed density system pissed off. 300 hp has been done by many people with a stock cam. The motor makes right around 225 hp right now. Another 75 hp is a walk in the park.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft

My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 08:38 AM   #13
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 291
Default

the four eyes are great looking cars...then you can find a later model 5.0 and stick it in
__________________
Previous and Current Rides:
1967 Ford Mustang Coupe
2002 Ford Mustang GT--SOLD!
1967 Ford Fairlane 500 XL--SOLD!
2003 Ford Mustang Cobra 1 of 308--SOLD!!
2003 Kawasaki Mean Streak--SOLD!!
2006 Harley Davidson Screamin' Eagle V-Rod
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 11:49 AM   #14
Regular
 
Mazlem's Avatar
 
1984 GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central NY State
Posts: 60
Default

I'd thought of that - if I'd be replacing stuff anyway, why not get the '86 since it's local, and put a modded motor in it. (Hard to find good older cars around here.)

There's an '89 motor nearby with 100k mi, which would match the 100k mi on the '86. Aside from wiring for the mass-air, would there be any issues putting an '89-'93 motor in the '86?

Also is the 5spd in the '86 any better/worse than '87-'93?
 
Old November 17th, 2006, 01:26 PM   #15
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 639
Default

Re: 86 GT - good/bad to start with?


Originally Posted by Darrell
Originally Posted by Mazlem
There's an '86 GT near me FS. I haven't checked it out yet but it sounds stock from the description.

From what I've read, the heads hinder it's performance, the throttle-body is smaller, and it's got the speed-density air instead of mass air. That said, is it really any worse of a year to start with for mods? The 1/4mi times look about the same for similar years. For any other year tho, I'd want to upgrade the throttle-body and intake manifold anyway; maybe not the heads, at least initially.

My short-term goal would be 250HP, long-term of 275-300 if that's possible without getting into blowers an such.

Like 82GT mentioned, the pistons are the major drawback in 1986. Not a big deal though. You have a few options. Flycut the stock pistons, buy some replacements or get a 1987 - 1993 short block from a salvage yard. Your horsepower goal is attainable, even without converting to mass air. Throttle bodies, intakes, heads, headers, etc can all be changed on a speed density car. Chips can be burned as well. Camshafts are about the only thing that makes a factory speed density system pissed off. 300 hp has been done by many people with a stock cam. The motor makes right around 225 hp right now. Another 75 hp is a walk in the park.
Or put in a 351........................................
__________________
"Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it" Rev. Jim Jones
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: 86 GT - Good / Bad To Start With?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
where to start EasyE64 V6 Mustangs 63 September 25th, 2007 03:50 AM
what websites are have good prices and good quality? blue03mach1 99-04 5 July 15th, 2007 05:49 PM
my car doesn't want to start ByPopularDemand V6 Mustangs 34 March 19th, 2007 11:55 PM
End Of Jan/Start of Feb ChrisJ Southeast 11 January 25th, 2007 09:43 PM
Where Should I Start? PaulluaP855 Modular Mustangs 15 January 23rd, 2007 01:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.