| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Short stroker, large bore/ Long Stroke, small bore in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. Which is better? Im in the planning stages of a 360 ci... 3.25 crank ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
Short stroker, large bore/ Long Stroke, small bore
Which is better? Im in the planning stages of a 360 ci... 3.25 crank or 3.4?
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 520
|
doesnt the smaller stroke rev quicker???
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
BLWN91GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dyer, Indiana
Posts: 407
|
yes the smaller the stroke, the faster it revs up
If you want to run alot of boost or run an efficent boost set up , the smaller stroke will help with the boost. A larger stroke as in either a 331-347 wont be essential for boost. A lot of fast drag racers prefer a 302 bored to a 306, and run alot of boost. A Nice DSS 306 is a great setup. PaT #06 |
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 520
|
larger bores promote better breathing... but will the difference b very evident in the situation that 331 stang stated? a 3.25 crank with a standard 4.185 bore makes 357.6 ci and a 3.4 stroke with a standard 4.125 bore makes 363.5 ci... assuming the same supporting hardware (intake, cam, etc.) which makes the quicker e.t?
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
1990 Mustang GT HO
N/A
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 3
|
Stroke it
Iv'e Always Appreciated the Big bore,Short Stroke
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 520
|
me too... but is there enough of a difference to choose the shorter stroke in the application 331stang mentioned? for discussion purposes...
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
1990 LX hatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 3,101
|
The more power an engine makes, the faster it revs. the short stroke/high rpm idea, really dosent determin the rev abilitys of an engine. The valvetrain does.
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 520
|
so the engine with the most power will always accelerate faster?
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MM Fanatic
1990 LX hatch
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart Indiana
Posts: 3,101
|
Yes. When it comes to a car engine. No. if you comapre a race engine to a Dremmel.
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang Gt
Run me and find out!!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lake City, FL
Posts: 520
|
so in the case of the 3.25 crank vs the 3.4 in larger bore motors they rev relatively the same seeing as how a 357 and a 363 would make about the same hp.
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
|
Large bore is better than a small bore in most cases because it unshrouds the valves more than a small bore does. Run the largest stroke that the heads will keep up with. More cubes equal more power unless the heads can't keep up with the airflow requirements.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
Thanks Darrell, that was the info I was looking for.
|
|
|
#13 |
|
MM Fanatic
1987 ford mustang gt
well see when shes done
Join Date: May 2007
Location: mascot, tn
Posts: 4,987
|
What kind of block are you going to be using?
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
|
Both are good heads. Just make sure if you have any porting done have it done by a reputable shop like TEA.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Zippee is my step sister.
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 10,353
|
Because its not true. Cubic inches makes horsepower plain and simple. Those guys are running 360 inch engines because rules allow it and they can make more power with the bigger engine.
__________________
Thanks to: Trick Flow, Team Z Motorsports, Total Engine Airflow and Furo Racecraft My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
thats what I was thinking...
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Short stroker, large bore/ Long Stroke, small bore
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| bore | gooberhead320 | V6 Mustangs | 5 | May 11th, 2008 06:02 PM |
| bore | Iownastang | 5.0 Mustangs | 11 | February 5th, 2008 11:18 PM |
| whats the bore and stroke? | superman5.0 | 5.0 Mustangs | 12 | August 13th, 2007 12:36 AM |
| new engine or bore and stroke | 88speedracer | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | April 11th, 2007 11:01 PM |
| Bore Size | cali 5.0 | Modular Mustangs | 8 | November 1st, 2006 03:00 AM |