| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
MM Fanatic
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
H/c/i ?
are the heads cam and intake from the 95 mustang the same as the fox bodies? If not would it be any benefit for a buddy of mine to put these on his fox body?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
87 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 1,220
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
Yes they are the same and no they aren't I believe. I know they are shaped a little different but as far as gaining performance I don't think they flow better or anything.
__________________
Eats rice daily
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM Fanatic
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
so I should tell him to put them on and put a 250 shot of gas on it and he will be amazed at the difference then huh?...just kidding ....well anyone think its worth porting and polishing them heads and intakes and putting them on? and what about the cam? come on darrel or ryan chime in
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
The intakes are different. The 94-95 intakes flow less air due to the stupid dog leg they put in them.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |