thermostat
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old August 12th, 2008, 05:22 PM   #1
Regular
 
88stang's Avatar
 
1988 Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 99
88stang is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

thermostat


I have heard two different things. Stick with a stock thermostat which I beleive is a 195* but some people have told me, considering what has been done to my motor, to run a 165*. Does it really matter?
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old August 12th, 2008, 06:30 PM   #2
Enthusiast
 
1983 mustang lx
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 504
83fox is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i think with the efi motors 165* would be too cold, causing the motor to run a little richer but i could be wrong.

180* is a pretty common choice for mustangs
  Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2008, 06:33 PM   #3
Regular
 
93lx306dev's Avatar
 
1993 ford mustang lx 302
13.2 @ 104mph
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 173
93lx306dev is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to 93lx306dev
Default

i just put a 160* in my car.. my car has never ran so good.. my car runs at about 172* all the time..
__________________


FORD = FOUND ON ROAD DOMINATING

www.myspace.com/stangdevin
  Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2008, 06:41 PM   #4
Enthusiast
 
1983 mustang lx
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 504
83fox is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

ah, i missed the part where you said 'considering whats been done to my motor'

you might want to run a 160 then
  Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2008, 06:49 PM   #5
Regular
 
shurb125's Avatar
 
1993 Mustang LX Vert
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 437
shurb125 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 88stang View Post
I have heard two different things. Stick with a stock thermostat which I beleive is a 195* but some people have told me, considering what has been done to my motor, to run a 165*. Does it really matter?
What has been done to your motor? The reason I ask is because I'm having cooling problems and just curious as to what works out for you.
__________________
306 TFS heads stage 3 port & polished, TFS stage 2 cam, TFS Track heat intake, DSS pistons, 24# injectors, 76mm MAF, 70mm BBK/Edelbrock TB and spacer
  Reply With Quote
Old August 12th, 2008, 07:56 PM   #6
Regular
 
88stang's Avatar
 
1988 Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 99
88stang is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

motor


Originally Posted by shurb125 View Post
What has been done to your motor? The reason I ask is because I'm having cooling problems and just curious as to what works out for you.
Motor: 347, gt40 upper and lower, Msd probillet distributor, msd 6a, msd tfi coil, 70mm eldebrock bbk throttle body, 76mm C & L maf calibrated for 30lb injectors and all the other quick mods such as under drive pulleys, gears, cold air and headers.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: thermostat
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thermostat? burnout5.0 94-95 7 November 9th, 2007 05:57 PM
Thermostat.... lwhitetrash88l V6 Mustangs 3 June 19th, 2007 03:36 PM
thermostat JBIGBOOTSY 5.0 Mustangs 2 May 24th, 2007 08:35 PM
Thermostat Onemanzu V6 Mustangs 2 April 20th, 2007 07:00 PM
Thermostat Pony_with_an_attitude 5.0 Mustangs 7 March 28th, 2007 10:26 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.