| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1993 Mustang
we'll find out when i come home from iraq.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: from Lawton, OK stationed @ Ft. Hood, TX
Posts: 1,860
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i know ceramic is better but
what is the real power differnce between ceramic headers and chrome?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
|
I believe there is no power difference, but a ceramic-coated header will last longer due to not having heat issues - I could be wrong though.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I Hate Convertibles...
|
+1
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1993 Mustang
we'll find out when i come home from iraq.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: from Lawton, OK stationed @ Ft. Hood, TX
Posts: 1,860
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ok b/c ive narrowed down to 3 choices for 493 i can get mac lt headers and a 2.5 in prochamber h pipe, 195 ceramic mac lt headers and a o/r h pipe and the last one is 398 chrome mac headers and o/r h pipe. which is the best?
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
!FACEPLATED!
|
ceramic will run way cooler than chrome
__________________
![]() MM Bracket Racing Crew Co-Founder ~Its a Drag Car, Not a Show Car~ LINK-->Custom Race Transmission Build<--LINK
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
There is a small difference in power but they will last longer and run cooler.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
+1 the engine bay and floor boards (not to mention your starter) with stay way cooler with ceramic coating and the headers themselves will last longer.
But as far as bang for the buck goes, it is kinda expensive.
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out. 03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it 04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it 89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1993 Mustang
we'll find out when i come home from iraq.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: from Lawton, OK stationed @ Ft. Hood, TX
Posts: 1,860
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yea i was leaning towards the ceramic w/ the h-pipe but how good is the mac prochamber? is it any increased power/performance or is it just for sound?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 4,737
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
prochamber does just that, chambers all your horsepower...
__________________
88 GT CHI headed 351w 10.8 @ 125 - still figuring it out. 03 Cobra 2.3 whipple 10.7 @ 129 - sold it 04 Mach 1 12.7 @ 109 mostly stock - sold it 89 LX procharged 302 515 hp 497 ftlbs 10.7 @130 mph - sold it
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1993 Mustang
we'll find out when i come home from iraq.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: from Lawton, OK stationed @ Ft. Hood, TX
Posts: 1,860
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
my guess was that the prochamber would restrict the flow. is that accurate?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: i know ceramic is better but
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ceramic or Crome | emgjsdk1 | General Tech | 44 | February 7th, 2008 03:41 PM |
| Is Ceramic Really Worth It? | street591 | V6 Mustangs | 14 | December 14th, 2007 07:24 PM |
| Chrome vs Ceramic? | AnglicoGT98 | 96-98 | 3 | June 22nd, 2007 05:24 PM |
| ceramic coating | SPF0percent | General Tech | 7 | March 21st, 2007 03:54 PM |
| Ceramic or Chrome | DCstangGT | 99-04 | 12 | October 3rd, 2006 04:51 AM |