347 or 331 - Page 3
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old August 29th, 2008, 01:53 AM   #41
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
78mach1's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 1,365
78mach1 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 78mach1
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
Please tell me what laws of physics make a 347 burn oil or have a short life. Show me a 347 that burns oil and I'll show you an incompetent engine builder. I've never seen a 347 or any other engine that has the wrist pin intersecting the oil ring groove (yes, there are several engine built this way) burn any oil or suffer reliability issues. Anyone that talks about rod to stroke ratios having ill effects on a 347 obviously doesn't know how foolish they look. A look at other popular factory engines will show a 347 actually has a more favorable rod to stroke ratio. Its also been proven over and over again that rod to stroke ratio means nothing. It doesn't have anything to do with wear and tear and it doesn't have anything to do with power production.

funny this came up, (like it always does) i was talking to a guy who has a 89 GT that looks pretty clean and runs good, has minor work dont, but anyway we got on this subject and he was saying the usual, 347`s let the piston skirt go to low, and the rod is to long, and they prematurely burn oil.

he said he was going to send me a site that showed what makes this possible with any stroker kit that has a bad "rod to stroke" ratio, so as soon as he shows me this ill post it up here
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/5-0-mustangs/86179-347-331-a.html
Posted By For Type Date
347 or 331 - Page 2 This thread Refback August 28th, 2008 02:22 AM

Threads Similar to: 347 or 331
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
331 or 347? 817B!GT3X 5.0 Mustangs 63 May 26th, 2008 04:39 PM
331 vs. 347 usmcsawgunner 5.0 Mustangs 25 February 7th, 2008 01:53 PM
331 or 347? 89lx 5.0 Mustangs 34 December 19th, 2007 10:46 PM
331 Or 347 e3sean 5.0 Mustangs 43 November 20th, 2007 11:45 PM
331 or 347 Fastpitchdad 5.0 Mustangs 17 September 16th, 2006 04:47 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.