| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
For all you speed density folks HELP
This winter im putting together a poor mans H/C/I swap. I have a tubular gt-40 intake and gt-40 heads that are getting ported. I have been doing some research on speed density builds, and I think I have just made myself more confused. I was almost content with just buying a steeda #19 cam, but know im second guessing that choice. I have read some good things about Crowers 15511 cam, but its pretty exspensive like $270ish, or I could be real cheap and just throw 1.7 rolers at it, but I hate to pull the motor out and not put a cam in while im there. I would like to hear anyones input on these choices or other alternative ideas?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
1989 Mustang LX
10.98@126.7 NA
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 698
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
How's throwing 1.7 "rollers" at it cheaper than a $270 cam (unless of course they are those cheap Chinese knock offs that self destruct and take your engine along for the ride)? I would have to think that a properly profiled cam that will play nice with the SD's vacumn wants and needs would be a better avenue overall.
__________________
Never fast enough.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
If you dont want the worry of sd why not do the mass air swap....then you can run any cam you want......
Doesnt take that much money to do....and only takes 30 min
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I meant just buying 1.7 rockers instead of buying a cam and rockers, thats what I mean by being cheaper. How do you convert to mass air in 30minutes. Are your talking about that jump harness, that ties into your speed density harness.? No one has any imput on either of those cams huh?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 9
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i am also interesred in sd improvements or is mass air the way to go?
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Holy Dick Castle!
1988 GT VERT (Sold :(
'Cause she's got a... GRRRREAT ASS!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: KC MO
Posts: 11,974
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
sd is actually faster stock to stock. untill you get to the whole cam issue
I found this on a diffrent web site Here are 6 cams that should work with Speed Density N/A use. Look at there application discriptions and match to your desired use. The cams with the longer durations of course will exibit some small amount of lower end torque loss until the engine gets into the cam's rpm range as specified by the mfger. This can be offset with higher stall convertor and/or lower rear gear ratios that allows the engine to get to the cam's range quicker. SD compatable CAMS. Crower 15510. Crower 15511. Comp. Cams #35-308-8 (266HR). Comp. Cams #35-310-8 (270HR). Crane #444211 (Power Max 2020). Crane #444221 (Power Max 2030). Notes; The Crower 15511 is about the longest duration that can be used and will degrade drivability somewhat but often can be tuned around if your willing to go to those lengths for performance. Looking at cam cards; the intake opening and exhaust closing points are the indicators of overlap. When you see an intake closeing spec ATDC and an exhaust closing BTDC, you are seeing negitive overlap such that no pump back should occurr. That should make the cam SD friendly. Pay attention to the mfger's discription per your application and above all 'believe what they say' about the RPM range of the cam and the reccomended valve springs and rocker ratios to use. Need a good Speed Density friendly cam - Corral Forums
__________________
![]() Last edited by dr.gonzo!; September 25th, 2008 at 09:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Well do you have upgraded springs? .....cheaper is not always better.
I would put springs on if I used 1.7's.... Used the 15511 before on SD and still had problems Mass air is simple..... Computer , air box, meter, pigtail and some wire...... very easy
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Oh I forgot to mention, I'm putting the trickflow spring upgrade package on the heads, I believe the springs claim to be good till 540lift.
93mustank, what do you mean by you had problems with the crower. did the car run without stalling |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Dr.Gonzo thanks for that info one the speed density friendly cams, I havent heard of some of those cam options before
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Alot of surging...wanted to die.... I have done three mass air swaps.... its easy and worth it.
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Holy Dick Castle!
1988 GT VERT (Sold :(
'Cause she's got a... GRRRREAT ASS!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: KC MO
Posts: 11,974
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
do you have any articals on how to do this? the ones I have read make it sound like a "30 pack" job
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
MM Fanatic
89 GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 4,875
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
That does have some incorrect info in it. It says that to use a Cobra computer, you have to use a MAF calibrated for 24# injectors, which isn't true. All you need for the Cobra computer is the 24# injectors and any MAF calibrated to 19# injectors. The Cobra computer makes the correction internally.... that info isn't for you 93mustank, its for people who read that article and don't know that.
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Darrell, I just figured that an after market cam would take better advantage of the ported gt40 heads compared to just using a stock cam with 1.7's. I just want to get the most power I can out of this setup.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Posts: 3,014
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
uh oh....cant take it back....said the magical words
Custom cam time for you..... ![]() Dont say your not going to......
__________________
PeteAndersonRacing.com |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
MM Fanatic
95 Mustang GT
depends how many people are pushing
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Playa del Carmen, Mexico
Posts: 3,243
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thats what I was gonna say call jay allen and have him grind you a cam
__________________
![]() People should think about boarding up their glass house before starting a rock fight! |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Do not under estimate the stock cam or the speed density system. Stock for stock the speed density cars run faster than the mass air cars. Factory Stock has run in the 11s with the stock cam and factory heads and intake. Others are making 300hp at the wheels with the stock cam. There is one guy on the Corral that is making 300hp at the wheels with GT40P heads and a stock cam. The link has been posted on here a couple times. A good combination will make good power.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
87 GT
14.2@98.something
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N.E Ohio
Posts: 118
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
A friend of the family is porting them. He puts together cigiratte boat motors for a living. I'm confident he knows what he is doing. I was going to have him grind the EGR bumps out and have them matched to the intake, and get them decked .0030 All im after is putting together a 285-300rwhp motor as economically as I can. I just figure that a cam like the steeda 19 would get me to those numbers much easier than just using a stock cam with 1.7's.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: For all you speed density folks HELP
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| speed density help | 1sick94hb | 5.0 Mustangs | 6 | July 3rd, 2008 02:22 AM |
| Speed Density to MAF? | nitrorustlerpro15 | 5.0 Mustangs | 2 | June 26th, 2008 11:12 PM |
| speed density tune???? | worlz08 | 5.0 Mustangs | 0 | June 4th, 2008 05:49 PM |
| MAF vs. speed density | UNFStang | 99-04 | 3 | June 4th, 2008 11:19 AM |
| Speed Density | Darrellx14 | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | December 2nd, 2006 08:50 PM |