Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs

Discussing dump my exhuast in the 5.0 Mustangs Forum. i like the way my dumps sound....not too loud....but i still have the ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 11th, 2008, 12:54 AM   #21
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Iwannagofast's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang GT
9.39@76.09----1/8th mile
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,829
Default

i like the way my dumps sound....not too loud....but i still have the cats also
__________________

stang=40's dumped,pro 5.0 short throw, king cobra clutch, adj. clutch cable and firewall adjuster...pretty much stock

2001 tacoma=magnaflow, K&N cai, tb spacer, 2.5" susp. lift, 32x11.50s, electric fan, few dress up items
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old October 11th, 2008, 12:58 AM   #22
Enthusiast
 
CAMN89GT's Avatar
 
1990 "BLOWN" Mustang GT
Single Digit Racing
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ON THE BUMPER......
Posts: 728
Default

Between my blower, my fuel pump .. it really doesn't matter if I had tails or dumps. I currently have tails, but I seem to made more power on the DYNO w/dumps. I can tolerate the smell, I used to run 110 so It didn't bother me... the heat, it's the same amount of heat, its all in ur head. Dumps FTW.
__________________

1990 Mustang GT
Rich Groh 342ci (We build 'em BIG!)
Vortech V-1 S-Trim, with a C-4
....How fast can it BE? Just fast enough to hold NY & TX on LOCKDOWN! KOTS!


BIG Thanks to.....
www.rgrengines.com
www.kurganmotorsports.com
www.artcarr.com
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 12:59 AM   #23
Regular
 
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 319
Default

if your going to dump your exhaust, dump it near the rear axle, not right under the drivers seat like most do. I'm a firm believer that a freeflowing full exhaust will move the power band lower in the rpm without sacfricing peak hp.

Dumps sound cool and are ok for a weekend car, but if you drive it more than 50 miles a week, it's annoying and obnoxious.
__________________
98 Cobra - Laser Red/Black - Bolt ons DD
'89 Notch - 4cyl car - 2.3T or built 302.. hmm
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 01:01 AM   #24
Enthusiast
 
CAMN89GT's Avatar
 
1990 "BLOWN" Mustang GT
Single Digit Racing
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ON THE BUMPER......
Posts: 728
Default

Originally Posted by superbean View Post
if your going to dump your exhaust, dump it near the rear axle, not right under the drivers seat like most do. I'm a firm believer that a freeflowing full exhaust will move the power band lower in the rpm without sacfricing peak hp.

Dumps sound cool and are ok for a weekend car, but if you drive it more than 50 miles a week, it's annoying and obnoxious.
+1 , I actually dumped them toward each of my slicks.. Made them warmer, better traction. I cheet, i know I cheet!
__________________

1990 Mustang GT
Rich Groh 342ci (We build 'em BIG!)
Vortech V-1 S-Trim, with a C-4
....How fast can it BE? Just fast enough to hold NY & TX on LOCKDOWN! KOTS!


BIG Thanks to.....
www.rgrengines.com
www.kurganmotorsports.com
www.artcarr.com
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 10:19 AM   #25
Banned
 
1989
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mastic Beach
Posts: 392
Default

oh my motor is carb so does that mean i should have straight pipes?
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 01:14 PM   #26
Regular
 
1988 Mustang
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lima, Ohio or Grand Blanc, Michigan
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by fogged306 View Post
Backpressure is not needed on a EFI engine with o2 sensors, it is more of a myth than anything. Proper exhaust scavenging is what you want with a properly tuned exhaust.
can you explain this? i always thought backpressure was very crucial to engine performance
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 06:06 PM   #27
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Hunt_chevs's Avatar
 
88 Gt
Not Slow
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SJ-CA, 50-ft elev.
Posts: 1,580
Default

Originally Posted by -Joeyy- View Post
oh my motor is carb so does that mean i should have straight pipes?
no its makes no difference whether your carbed or not
__________________
Stock heads w/ dual angle valve job, chevy valves, K&N intake, bbk equals, bbk o/r H, 2 chamber flows,
373's, pro 5.0, sportline drop

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biiR0-7pw10
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 06:07 PM   #28
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Hunt_chevs's Avatar
 
88 Gt
Not Slow
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SJ-CA, 50-ft elev.
Posts: 1,580
Default

Originally Posted by -Joeyy- View Post
I am saying straight pipes produce more back pressure. In less i am wrong?
str8 pipes = zero back pressure
__________________
Stock heads w/ dual angle valve job, chevy valves, K&N intake, bbk equals, bbk o/r H, 2 chamber flows,
373's, pro 5.0, sportline drop

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biiR0-7pw10
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 06:11 PM   #29
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
stangfreak's Avatar
 
MEMBER #334
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wyandotte County
Posts: 1,483
Default

i heared you lose some torque without tail pipes but i always go with dumps. always
__________________

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
I know he singled me out because I have a small penis.
Originally Posted by dr.gonzo View Post
listen man...I need those pills. I need width and or girth you know what im sayin.
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 06:12 PM   #30
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Hunt_chevs's Avatar
 
88 Gt
Not Slow
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SJ-CA, 50-ft elev.
Posts: 1,580
Default

Originally Posted by stangfreak View Post
i heared you lose some torque without tail pipes but i always go with dumps. always
PERIOD
__________________
Stock heads w/ dual angle valve job, chevy valves, K&N intake, bbk equals, bbk o/r H, 2 chamber flows,
373's, pro 5.0, sportline drop

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biiR0-7pw10
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 06:34 PM   #31
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
fogged306's Avatar
 
89 GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Happy?
Posts: 1,273
Default

Originally Posted by 88Saleen View Post
can you explain this? i always thought backpressure was very crucial to engine performance
It's not how everybody thinks. There are many variables to this... yes there are certain cars that require a certain amount of backpressure, such as some carb'd cars. Some of them used backpressure as a way to keep too much air from getting in the combustion chamber to maintain stoich. If you remove this backpressure, you are allowing more air in to the combustion chamber but still using the same amount of fuel, resulting in a lean condition, burnt valves ect... An EFI car with o2 sensors will not run into this problem because it will sense the mixture going lean and correct it, something that a carb cannot do.

What you want is exhaust scavenging, what it does is essentially create a vaccum in which the exhaust gasses travelling out of one cylinder will "suck" the spent gas out of another, and so on (in conjunction with the piston pushing it out). When you go too big of an exhaust, you can lose scavenging and it can result in a loss of power. You basically want to match your exhaust size to your power level.
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 06:59 PM   #32
Banned
 
1989
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mastic Beach
Posts: 392
Default

ohh ok but i am still confused i have a carb 351 do i want straight pips or dumps when it comes to wanting more power?

because i was told straight pipes give the back pressure not dumps so i am confused here
 
Old October 11th, 2008, 11:02 PM   #33
Regular
 
Chris951's Avatar
 
1988 Mustang 5.0
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 403
Default

Dude get dumps. I drive my car 300+ miles a week on the highway with 4.10's and dumped Mac flowpaths. You get used to it. I think I might get some tailpipes just to make the car look a little better though. I think Lx's look horrible without tailpipes.
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 12:39 AM   #34
Banned
 
1989
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mastic Beach
Posts: 392
Default

i mean for power though i dont care at all for the sound as to if it is to loud or not ( my motor can never be TO loud for my ears )
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 02:21 AM   #35
Regular
 
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 319
Default

blah blah blah.. backpressure is a myth as far as im concered..

look at any dyno with header and/or exhaust size comparisons..

the bigger exhaust will ALWAYS make more peak power..

now here comes the question.. WHERE do you want your torque band?

a stock exhaust will allow for a sooner power curve in the rpm and net a lower hp..
bigger exhaust will allow for a later power curve and make more tq...

in racing, you want as much tq at the highest rpm possible..

Even if someone builds a 'street' motor, he could still benefit from a larger exhaust..

go big, you can always build a motor to grow into it.

so to answer the dumps question.. it has nothing to do with power, but merely if you can stand the sound of dumps all the time .. nauseating if you ask me.
__________________
98 Cobra - Laser Red/Black - Bolt ons DD
'89 Notch - 4cyl car - 2.3T or built 302.. hmm
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 02:24 AM   #36
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 408
Default

FWIW, dumps under the car make it louder in the car. Good excuse for an amp and a couple subs.
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 02:38 AM   #37
Regular
 
1998 Cobra
13.24@105.66
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 319
Default

Originally Posted by fairlane_68 View Post
FWIW, dumps under the car make it louder in the car. Good excuse for an amp and a couple subs.
and tear drops for the carbon monoxide.
__________________
98 Cobra - Laser Red/Black - Bolt ons DD
'89 Notch - 4cyl car - 2.3T or built 302.. hmm
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 02:46 AM   #38
Banned
 
1989
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mastic Beach
Posts: 392
Default

so basically there is no performance difference between flowmaster dumps and flowmaster straight pipes?
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 11:31 AM   #39
MM Fanatic
 
1993 5.ohhhh
14.47 at 96 mph
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 3,129
Default

Originally Posted by stangfreak View Post
i heared you lose some torque without tail pipes but i always go with dumps. always
The ojly difference with cutting the tail pipes off is sound. That wont affect back pressure in anyway. It's the cutting off of mufflers that will do so.
__________________
302 h/c/i
 
Old October 12th, 2008, 03:21 PM   #40
Banned
 
1989
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mastic Beach
Posts: 392
Default

ohh ok i got ya, so basically dumps are louder then straight pipes?
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: dump my exhuast
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The GT took a dump... zinc02GT The Clubhouse 13 September 16th, 2008 11:31 PM
To Dump or Not to Dump??? 2002stang Exhaust 10 July 28th, 2008 03:19 PM
should i dump ? SilverGT04 99-04 12 May 13th, 2008 01:37 AM
To dump or not to dump whitemustang02 V6 Mustangs 17 January 18th, 2008 06:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.