| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
91 lx
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: newark, de.
Posts: 2
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
which flowmaster to use??
i bought my mustang new in 91, had 2 chamber flowmasters installed in 92. 1 muffler has a small rusted hole in it, time to replace them! i checked out flowmasters website and found that there are 2 popular mufflers offered. the 40 series - #42443 that i have, and a new one the super 44 - #942448. whats the differance?? the tech. line at flowmaster says the super 44 has a deeper tone, but if you listen to the sound bites on their website it sounds like the other way around. please fill me in, is the super 44 the latest greatest, or is the 40 series which is what i got in 92 the cats meow??
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
i love my 40's but my buddys fox has 44's and its a little louder..we have the same exhaust setup otherwise so i can tell the difference
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
It is strickly your opinion on which one sounds better.
If I were you, unless the rest of your existing exhaust behind the H pipe is in great shape, I'd forget the whole muffler thing and just get an entire Flowmaster cat back kit. I'm sure if one of your mufflers is bad, the rest may soon follow. The cat backs are a breeze to install and you could bump up to a 2.5 in as well. If you don't mind the 40's, you could get the American Thunder 17116 2.5 aluminized cat back kit with 40 series mufflers for about $300 or slightly more if you have an LX and want polished tips. Like i said though, it is all opinion, I have one of the above kits on each of my Mustangs, on my stock 91 its not bad but on my 88, it is WAY to loud and droned out for me and my next kit or mufflers will NOT be from Flowmaster.
__________________
Last edited by nolife; October 28th, 2008 at 12:33 AM. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Newbie
91 lx
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: newark, de.
Posts: 2
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.64@101mph
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetss
Posts: 5,799
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
they have an super 44 cat-back setup out there? you sure? cuz i dont think so...i must be missing something
__________________
1990 GT- 5.0L |BBK Shortys|VRS O/R X| SLP LM1 Catback|BBK CAI| Centerforce Clutch|MGW Short Throw| Alum D/S| 3.73's| Steeda Springs...about as stock as a 5.0 comes now a days..much more to come |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1994 GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: lake worth, Florida
Posts: 1,002
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
get the supper 44's..they are the best they have..and they sound great
__________________
Cohagan Engineering, Inc. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
87 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 1,207
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
30's FTMFW
__________________
Eats rice daily
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: which flowmaster to use??
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone Have Flowmaster 44? | 03SonicBoom | 99-04 | 13 | July 14th, 2008 07:02 PM |
| Flowmaster 02 v6 | Archy88 | General Tech | 2 | June 24th, 2008 05:33 PM |
| new flowmaster | KhaosGT | 99-04 | 22 | April 20th, 2007 11:39 AM |
| Flowmaster | gtg8920 | V6 Mustangs | 8 | April 14th, 2007 12:45 AM |
| F**k Flowmaster! | ScreaminYellow05 | V6 Mustangs | 13 | January 26th, 2007 04:49 PM |