Trick Flow Track Heat vs. Explorer Intake
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > 5.0 Mustangs > 94-95

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools
Old February 11th, 2010, 06:19 PM   2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1
Regular
 
lakefrontlivin's Avatar
 
1995 GT Convertible 5.0
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 107
lakefrontlivin is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to lakefrontlivin
Default

Trick Flow Track Heat vs. Explorer Intake


I have a chance to pick up a Trick Flow Track Heat intake manifold setup for my 95 GT 5.0 Convertible for a good price.. But have already bought the Explorer intake setup.. Should I buy the trick flow setup and sell the Explorer setup ?? Just would like some opinions on which way to go ???

I'm thinking the trick flow way ..... Would I have to get anything besides the adaptor to run the track heat intake ?? Thanx in advance ,... Tom


**I had this post started in the 5.0 section by mistake.. This section might be able to get me some more answers or input... Maybe someone out there has done this..
I'll post a link to the other posting..Trick Flow Track Heat vs. Explorer Intake
Thanx, Tom
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old February 12th, 2010, 03:49 PM   #2
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 609
95project is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

it totally depends on what you want to do with the car? What are your plans? The explorer may suit your goals just fine..more detail on your goals and we can help.
__________________
95 GT- AFR 185's, Comp CAM, Trick FLow TH upper and lower, 30lb injec, 76MM C&L kit, Full MSD, BBK Pulleys, 3:73, BBK Long Tubes, X Pipe, Magnaflow Cat back, Cobra front control arms, MM CC plates LCA's and Panhard bar, tuned by Adam @ Pops Racing.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 12th, 2010, 10:48 PM   #3
Regular
 
lakefrontlivin's Avatar
 
1995 GT Convertible 5.0
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 107
lakefrontlivin is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to lakefrontlivin
Default

Just want to have a nice street car with some power for the occasional rip down the road or a trip to the dragstrip and not be embarrassed..

Tom
  Reply With Quote
Old February 13th, 2010, 08:20 AM   #4
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Bullitt95's Avatar
 
1995 Mustang GT auto
13.546 @ 105.32
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Ain, UAE
Posts: 1,452
Bullitt95 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Bullitt95
Default

With the Explorer intake you're limiting yourself to about 300rwhp whereas with the Trick Flow, you could reach 340rwhp depending on the rest of the engine combo. Tell us what's the rest of your engine combo is so we can make a recommendation.
__________________

243.5rwhp/284.2rwtq
Mod list in My Garage

Last edited by Bullitt95; February 13th, 2010 at 08:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 13th, 2010, 03:45 PM   #5
Regular
 
lakefrontlivin's Avatar
 
1995 GT Convertible 5.0
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 107
lakefrontlivin is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to lakefrontlivin
Default

The car will have GT40 P heads with 1.7 roller rockers with the stock cam. Underdrive pulleys and CAI. Car is an automatic and am having 4.10 gears put in it in the spring along with the other parts mentioned... Stock exhaust for now.. Open to suggestions..

Tom

I'm leaning towards the Trick Flow intake as it will handle some more mods in the future ... When I get some cash or score some better heads...
  Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2010, 02:55 AM   #6
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Bullitt95's Avatar
 
1995 Mustang GT auto
13.546 @ 105.32
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Ain, UAE
Posts: 1,452
Bullitt95 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Bullitt95
Default

Originally Posted by lakefrontlivin View Post
The car will have GT40 P heads with 1.7 roller rockers with the stock cam. Underdrive pulleys and CAI. Car is an automatic and am having 4.10 gears put in it in the spring along with the other parts mentioned... Stock exhaust for now.. Open to suggestions..

Tom

I'm leaning towards the Trick Flow intake as it will handle some more mods in the future ... When I get some cash or score some better heads...
In that case I'd suggest the Explorer intake and have the lower ported by Tom Moss. You should end up around the 250rwhp mark (rwhp figures I mentioned earlier were for a T5 so subtract 12% for an AODE/4R70W).
As for gears, I recommend the 3.73 that I have. The 4.10 is too steep and your tranny would be shifting into overdrive long before you reach the 1/4 mile. The 4.10 will also make 1st gear virtually useless.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 14th, 2010, 09:20 PM   #7
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 159
817B!GT3X is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

^ Nothing but Bull shit in that post.

For know you can put the heads and advance the stock cam by 4* Degrees. I would get the intake and sell the Explorer intake on ebay to get some of your money back.

Do you know what the car runs in the 1/4 mile?
  Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2010, 01:45 AM   #8
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Bullitt95's Avatar
 
1995 Mustang GT auto
13.546 @ 105.32
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Ain, UAE
Posts: 1,452
Bullitt95 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Bullitt95
Default

Originally Posted by 817B!GT3X View Post
^ Nothing but Bull shit in that post.
Oh really? If you're going to call BS at least have the decency to provide an explanation!

I stand by my suggestion of using the Explorer intake on the GT40P heads (advancing the stock cam 4 degrees is a good idea as per Tmoss combo) but Tom could still get the Trick Flow intake and keep it on one side until he gets higher-flowing heads. Then he can install heads/intake at the same time and sell the Explorer intake. Tom would need to upgrade the fuel pump and swap in 24lb injectors plus calibrated MAF with the higher-flowing heads/TFS intake.
Since the exhaust is still stock, that needs to go and be replaced by LT headers, midpipe (O/R or catted depending on state), and 2.5" catbacks. No point in having high-flowing heads if they're choked off by the stock exhaust.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 15th, 2010, 06:08 PM   #9
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 159
817B!GT3X is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I am referring to the gear comment you stated.


2.5 exhaust are you serious???

No point aswell as having great heads when getting choke by 2.5 exhuast. Get 3 inch piping if you can

With that Trick Flow intake and Trick Flow heads and a custom valve train, and cam from Jay Allen you will easily get in the 11's.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2010, 03:44 AM   #10
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Bullitt95's Avatar
 
1995 Mustang GT auto
13.546 @ 105.32
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Ain, UAE
Posts: 1,452
Bullitt95 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Bullitt95
Default

Originally Posted by 817B!GT3X View Post
I am referring to the gear comment you stated.

2.5 exhaust are you serious???

No point aswell as having great heads when getting choke by 2.5 exhuast. Get 3 inch piping if you can
A dual 2.5" exhaust will support up to 500fwhp which is more than enough for a N/A 5.0. A dual 3" exhaust will support up to 700fwhp.
As for the gear, I'd only recommend a 4.10 if you have a 3000+rpm stall converter, an engine that breathes to 6000+rpm, and have programmed the tranny to shift at 6000+rpm.

Originally Posted by 817B!GT3X View Post
With that Trick Flow intake and Trick Flow heads and a custom valve train, and cam from Jay Allen you will easily get in the 11's.
With an automatic, mid-12's are more likely. The TFS stuff with custom cam and higher stall converter should put down about 285-290rwhp.

Last edited by Bullitt95; February 16th, 2010 at 03:56 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2010, 07:44 AM   #11
Regular
 
cantbuytime's Avatar
 
1995 GT 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 139
cantbuytime is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

There is no need for 3" exhaust.. 2.5" will be more then enough.. You would need to be cranking out serious power for that need.. but having 4 cats and stock headers will choke the livin crap out of any motor.. 2.5" stainless exhaust, 2 high flow cats, an H or X pipe and long tubes will make a world of difference..

My ex had a 1999 4.6 with all factory exhaust and bullet glass packs.. We went in and added all 3" pipe and flowmaster mufflers.. She lost 29HP and 17tq from this.. FI motors under 350hp usually dont do too well with no back pressure... I tried to tell her but she wanted it done..

On the intake, you should consider long term goals.. Your best bet is a trickflow setup so it can be used if you build a mo power engine..LOL.. Explorer intake is fine if you never plan on getting over 350hp..

  Reply With Quote
Old February 16th, 2010, 11:26 PM   #12
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 159
817B!GT3X is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

You did it on a Modular that don't respond great to big exhaust.

This a Pushrod we are talking about, and don't say that 3" exhaust will hurt tq bull shit its nothing but a myth.


Please tell me why its to much for a 350hp car
  Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2010, 09:45 AM   #13
Regular
 
cantbuytime's Avatar
 
1995 GT 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 139
cantbuytime is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Its not a necessity.. 3" exhaust on a 350hp motor instead of 2.5 "MIGHT" give you 1 or 2 hp difference..


Most street engines under 500hp need some kind of back pressure.

Even the placement of the mufflers in the exhaust system can make a difference in hp and tq cause of backpressure..

I wasnt saying the 3" will hurt the tq. I was just saying its not really gonna help him to have 3" on what he is building..
__________________

1995 Mustang GT ,Out with the 302 in with a Viper V10 (Still a work in progress)

  Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2010, 11:25 AM   #14
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Bullitt95's Avatar
 
1995 Mustang GT auto
13.546 @ 105.32
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Ain, UAE
Posts: 1,452
Bullitt95 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Bullitt95
Default

Only turbo engines "need" some exhaust backpressure in order to allow the turbo to spool up faster especially at low rpm and reduce lag. N/A engines perform best with the least possible backpressure. Too big an exhaust creates more backpressure at low rpm because exhaust gases travel too slowly down the pipes, resulting in a loss of low rpm torque. The optimum size pipe allows exhaust gases to travel as fast as possible over the widest possible rpm range. For a 350hp engine, a dual 2.5" system is plenty enough.
  Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2010, 11:58 AM   #15
Regular
 
cantbuytime's Avatar
 
1995 GT 5.0
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 139
cantbuytime is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Bullitt95 View Post
Only turbo engines "need" some exhaust backpressure in order to allow the turbo to spool up faster especially at low rpm and reduce lag. N/A engines perform best with the least possible backpressure. Too big an exhaust creates more backpressure at low rpm because exhaust gases travel too slowly down the pipes, resulting in a loss of low rpm torque. The optimum size pipe allows exhaust gases to travel as fast as possible over the widest possible rpm range. For a 350hp engine, a dual 2.5" system is plenty enough.
i am horrible at explaining things..sorry

bullitt95 hit the nail on the head..
__________________

1995 Mustang GT ,Out with the 302 in with a Viper V10 (Still a work in progress)

  Reply With Quote
Old February 17th, 2010, 10:33 PM   #16
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 159
817B!GT3X is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Login


I also have personal experience with changing my 2.5 exhaust to a 3 inch exhaust, and noticing a great gain from it
  Reply With Quote
Old February 18th, 2010, 11:13 AM   #17
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Bullitt95's Avatar
 
1995 Mustang GT auto
13.546 @ 105.32
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Al Ain, UAE
Posts: 1,452
Bullitt95 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via ICQ to Bullitt95
Default

Originally Posted by 817B!GT3X View Post
I also have personal experience with changing my 2.5 exhaust to a 3 inch exhaust, and noticing a great gain from it
What's your set-up? Everyone's is different so the result of going from a 2.5" to a 3" exhaust will also be different.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/94-95/152892-trick-flow-track-heat-vs-explorer-intake.html
Posted By For Type Date
Free PSP ISO Downloads EUR PSP ISO & CSO Downloads This thread Refback May 2nd, 2012 10:23 AM
Thread Trick Flow Track Heat vs. Explorer Intake | Forums at Modded Mustangs | BoardReader This thread Refback March 18th, 2011 12:42 AM

Threads Similar to: Trick Flow Track Heat vs. Explorer Intake
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trick Flow Track Heat vs. Explorer Intake lakefrontlivin 5.0 Mustangs 46 February 12th, 2010 08:04 AM
New Trick Flow Track Heat Intake cowboyup351 5.0 Mustangs 9 March 31st, 2009 12:06 PM
Trick Flow Track Heat HP burnout5.0 94-95 18 May 9th, 2008 09:11 AM
Trick Flow street and track heat shurb125 5.0 Mustangs 3 June 11th, 2007 10:43 PM
Trick Flow Track Heat Kit Erron89 5.0 Mustangs 6 February 8th, 2007 05:08 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.