| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Enthusiast
|
Heads and Intake.
Ok so i think im going to go with some after market heads and intake....maybe twisted wedge and street heat. Not sure yet other suggestions would be nice. im working off of a budget so im not gonna be able to get the TOP of the line. I was wondering if i would have to modify anything else if i replace the heads and intake.
__________________
![]() 95 gt H.O. Udp's, Pypes O/r X, flowmaster 40's,CAI, 3.73 gears, C&L 76mm MAF,GT40p's, Shorties, 1.6 rr's,Gt40 manifold, short throw, Back Seat Delete BOOSTED |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
|
would i see a big difference in just porting and polishing the heads and intake?
__________________
![]() 95 gt H.O. Udp's, Pypes O/r X, flowmaster 40's,CAI, 3.73 gears, C&L 76mm MAF,GT40p's, Shorties, 1.6 rr's,Gt40 manifold, short throw, Back Seat Delete BOOSTED |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
You can't go wrong with Trick Flow products. If you are just doing a mild build I wouldn't worry about porting. Out of the box Twisted Wedge heads work very well on mild 302s.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Re: Heads and Intake.
Don't waste time and effort trying to port the stock heads and intake manifold; it'll be like polishing a turd. You'll be a lot happier with TFS Twisted Wedge heads (the 40lb weight saving won't hurt either) and an aftermarket intake. The Edelbrock Performer is better than the TFS Street Heat intake all round, and the Holley Systemax intake also beats the TFS Track Heat intake all ends up. Go with a 70mm TB on the Eddy Performer and a 75mm TB on the Holley. If you're gonna do the heads and intake, do the cam as well. The TFS Stage 1 matches perfectly with the Twisted Wedge heads. Since you're on a budget, you could wait until you've saved more money and buy the "top of the line" parts that I've mentioned. That way you'll do the job only once and you'll save on labor charges.
__________________
![]() 244whp/284wtq Mod list in My Garage |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
|
If i went with just the intake for now would i see an improvement? and the tfs has a 75mm throttle body outlet...does that mean i need to buy that size?
__________________
![]() 95 gt H.O. Udp's, Pypes O/r X, flowmaster 40's,CAI, 3.73 gears, C&L 76mm MAF,GT40p's, Shorties, 1.6 rr's,Gt40 manifold, short throw, Back Seat Delete BOOSTED |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Depending on which intake you go for, you could gain about 15hp at the top end and lose some torque in the midrange. That especially applies when you combine a higher flowing intake like the Holley Systemax, TFS Track Heat, or Edelbrock Performer RPM with the stock heads. This is because airflow velocity is reduced at lower rpm through the larger diameter (and shorter) intake runners yet at the same time, the stock heads are too restrictive to allow these intakes to perform to their full potential at higher rpm. That's the reason why it's better to do intake and heads at the same time; the combination needs to be well matched.
If you do the heads, then you can also extract more out of the stock cam by adding 1.7 ratio roller rockers to take advantage of the better airflow at higher valve lifts. The stock cam/1.7 ratio rocker combination is pretty good but the TFS Stage 1 combined with 1.6 ratio roller rockers is better. You don't necessarily have to buy a 75mm TB with the intake but it's better if you do.
__________________
![]() 244whp/284wtq Mod list in My Garage |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Re: Heads and Intake.
What data do you base your information on regarding these intake manifolds?
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Re: Heads and Intake.
The Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold on a stock headed 5.0 that had C&L 76mm MAF kit, 70mm TB, long tube headers, exhaust, and 1.7 roller rockers produced a 13hp gain and a 13lbft loss. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Re: Heads and Intake.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
I don't have the whole dyno plots but suffice to say that the intake ports on the stock heads are too small for the higher flowing intakes to perform to their full potential. The larger diameter shorter runners combined with the restrictive heads reduce airflow velocity at low/medium rpm so it's no surprise that there's a loss of torque.
The bottom line is that the Edelbrock Performer produces more torque than the TFS Street Heat right across the board, and the Holley Systemax does the same compared to the TFS Track Heat when bolted onto higher flowing heads such as the AFR 165's or the TFS Twisted Wedge. If you're going to keep the stock heads, you're better off with the Explorer or Cobra GT40 intakes.
__________________
![]() 244whp/284wtq Mod list in My Garage |
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Heads and Intake.
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GT-40 Intake and Heads | 89StAngerLX | 5.0 Mustangs | 9 | November 13th, 2007 02:34 PM |
| Bullitt heads/intake on npi | LXstang5.0 | Modular Mustangs | 4 | October 18th, 2007 12:43 AM |
| pi intake and heads | ZoomZoomMFer | 96-98 | 47 | September 16th, 2007 02:24 PM |
| Heads and intake | Tony_90fox | 5.0 Mustangs | 3 | July 14th, 2006 04:22 AM |