| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
huh i dont get it
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ehicle&CID=626
how does he have a pi intake? w/o the heads? any1 help me out |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
to upgrade to a complete pi set up you need the heads and cams and intake. but you can do them seperately....and the intake would prolly be the easiest to do, but if i am not mistaken the biggest gain is from the heads and cams
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM's nicest mod, :)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 3,718
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
you can get an adapter to fit the pi intake to non-pi intake heads
__________________
06 Dodge MegaCab Diesel 455rwhp/815rwtq REAL TRUCKS DON'T USE SPARK PLUGS |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
U can do the intake by itself without doing the pi heads it does require some small mods but its not worth it without the heads casper did a great post of this procesure
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
this should anser your questions and concerns
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
||
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: belding, michigan
Posts: 840
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i thought you only gain like 50 to 60 hp at the crank with a pi swap
i only got 15 hp at the wheels with the pi intake and a set of bbk headers
__________________
1969 Early Bronco 3.5" lift 37" swampers 1969 Early Bronco 2" lift half cab 1979 2.3t Cobra 1997 Black Cobra http://www.cardomain.com/ride/680999 http://www.myspace.com/beheivjer |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 168
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
the heads give u the most gain due to the valve work , that is why if u get patriot heads the valve work and cams are diff so it raises the compresion. which inreturn gives u more horse power
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: belding, michigan
Posts: 840
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
its closer to 30hp at the wheels with a full pi swap.
__________________
1969 Early Bronco 3.5" lift 37" swampers 1969 Early Bronco 2" lift half cab 1979 2.3t Cobra 1997 Black Cobra http://www.cardomain.com/ride/680999 http://www.myspace.com/beheivjer |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
So a PI swap basically turns a 96-98 into a 99-04 power wise? Same hp and tq?
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: belding, michigan
Posts: 840
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thats the point of the swap you gain a little bit more because of the slight bump in compression
__________________
1969 Early Bronco 3.5" lift 37" swampers 1969 Early Bronco 2" lift half cab 1979 2.3t Cobra 1997 Black Cobra http://www.cardomain.com/ride/680999 http://www.myspace.com/beheivjer |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: belding, michigan
Posts: 840
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
but then it also helps out with all the other mods they are a little more responsive than on the npi motors
thats why im going to go with the pi swap onto my stroker kit i got
__________________
1969 Early Bronco 3.5" lift 37" swampers 1969 Early Bronco 2" lift half cab 1979 2.3t Cobra 1997 Black Cobra http://www.cardomain.com/ride/680999 http://www.myspace.com/beheivjer |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
The major gain (5-10) is from the compression being raised from the different combustion chamber design. A heavily ported head on a near stock motor will not net anywhere near what it would on a F.I. or race built N/A(high compression/upwards of 11:1). The point of the swap is to allow more air to enter the engine, the npi intake features small runners(diameter, less plenum volume and poor radius' that cause a slower air velocity. The gains seen with the intake are complimented when the cams (PI) are installed. The heads flow nearly the same however the NPI heads are limited to aroung .540" lift due to the spring perch height. The question you have to ask yourself , are the heads worth the money for gains ?
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
patriot heads are fine. i know many people that run there heads that put out huge power and dont have any problems.they had a problem in the beginning and they seem to have fixed that. i said the biggest gain would be from the heads and the cams...then you said i was wrong after you claim the intake gets you 15-20 and the heads 5-10 and cams 15-20 therefore making the head and cams swap more of a gain. if you can explain how i am wrong then i will gladly admit it
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
|
well because ... if you think heads/cams net more (20-25rwhp together) over the cams/intake (30-40rwhp) then i guess i must not know math. like he said you only get hp from the heads because of its compression. you would get more hp from the intake+cams over the heads+cams.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ok i see what you are saying. i was thinking either heads and cams or just the intake....but seriously if you aregoing to do the cams you might as well do the heads at the same time. guess thats just what i was thinking.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Enthusiast
|
As jEEd said 30-40 from the intake/cam swap, 20-25 from cam/head swap. I wish everyone you know luck with patriot heads I had a bad deal with them, the money I saved buying their heads costed me a $4000 shortblock.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: huh i dont get it
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dont know | scxc15 | V6 Mustangs | 14 | April 2nd, 2007 01:18 PM |
| dont rag on me to much | notsoslo5.0 | 5.0 Mustangs | 7 | March 6th, 2007 04:53 PM |
| Dont know what to do... | scxc15 | V6 Mustangs | 23 | February 2nd, 2007 06:41 PM |
| dont know what to do | 9stang1 | 5.0 Mustangs | 1 | January 16th, 2007 08:54 PM |
| dont no wat it is | Rolis | V6 Mustangs | 21 | December 28th, 2006 11:06 PM |