Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 96-98

Discussing what RWHP am i looking at? in the 96-98 Forum. I have a 98 gt and im putting on a PI intake, underdrive pulleys and ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old May 24th, 2007, 10:39 AM   #1
Regular
 
1998 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotia , NY
Posts: 76
Default

what RWHP am i looking at?


I have a 98 gt and im putting on a PI intake, underdrive pulleys and a msd blaster coils packs with new wire and plugs. what Hp am i looking at at the rear wheel?
__________________
Quit smilin your drivin a camaro!!

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/b...iewsingle1.jpg

PI intake
March Pulleys
18x9 Black Bullit rims
msd coil packs
Stage 3 XTD King Cobra Clutch
Soon To Come:

O/r H-Pipe
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 11:13 AM   #2
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arab, ALABAMA... out in tha cauntry...
Posts: 86
Default

220-230 ish.. that's my guess...
__________________
http://a598.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...2851335ded.jpg

96' "Slowbra"
B&M Shifter
JLT RAI
No Cats
Flowmasters
Wheel Spacers
KYB struts
Eibach Springs
BF Goodwrich G-Force in 4 corners.
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 11:17 AM   #3
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
MustangMatt96GT's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
Default

Yeah I would guess 230-235. Do you have any exhaust differences or CAI? The reason being the intake flows more air than the NPI so if you can get more in air in there through a CAI such as a JLT and then get the air out of there quicker with some exhaust mods your numbers would be higher!
BTW I could be totaly off base, but I feel that those numbers are in your ballpark!
__________________


We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 12:26 PM   #4
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Default

My question for you all is that a stock 1998 Mustang GT stock with 225hp and 290ft/lbs so how would you get those numbers? I added a trick flow upper plenum and a flowmaster exhaust and get'n about 245hp! I would say you'd get about 250hp but I heard not to go with the PI shit because it highers compression and making it difficult supercharging or turbo. I would save up and get patriot heads for about 1,200 dollars and a Typhoon Intake Mainifold for 600 dollars. That would add at least 50hp if not more. I come to the conclusion that Ford shit is expensive though!
__________________
Slightly Modded 1998 Mustang GT
Trick Flow Upper Plenum
Flowmaster Exhaust
234/240 Camshafts
3.73 Gears
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 12:51 PM   #5
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 773
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang1998GT
My question for you all is that a stock 1998 Mustang GT stock with 225hp and 290ft/lbs so how would you get those numbers? I added a trick flow upper plenum and a flowmaster exhaust and get'n about 245hp! I would say you'd get about 250hp but I heard not to go with the PI shit because it highers compression and making it difficult supercharging or turbo. I would save up and get patriot heads for about 1,200 dollars and a Typhoon Intake Mainifold for 600 dollars. That would add at least 50hp if not more. I come to the conclusion that Ford shit is expensive though!
I'll help you out a bit here, Patriot heads are just ported P.I heads and have a tarnished history for bad valve guides. The Typhoon intake well the name speaks for itself it blows.
245 huh ? That must be at the crank, I would like to see the dyno graph on that one. I not ragging on you by any means, I'm pointing out that the parts you listed are proven to be less than stellar and will not show a 50 rwhp gain.
The mods listed by shadow98gt may net a total of 225 tops, the MSD stuff will net limited power on a stock engine 1-2 rwhp on a good day.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 01:23 PM   #6
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
sonicblue's Avatar
 
1990 GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
Default

yea you must be talking about crank hp. patriot has seemed to fix there past problems. i know several people who use them with no probs.
__________________
1990 5.0
getting all fixed up for next season
2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 04:29 PM   #7
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Casper98GT's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
Default

I
have a 98 gt and im putting on a PI intake, underdrive pulleys and a msd blaster coils packs with new wire and plugs. what Hp am i looking at at the rear wheel?
230-235!! WRONG.

A 1998 will dyno right around 180-190 to the rear wheels stock. I was at 201 at the rear wheels with flows, CAI, and coil packs and wires. and 206 rwhp with a tune.

If You are stock with a PI intake, Underdrives, and wires and packs. I would say around 220ish. Maybe even less.
__________________
White99stang-
Damn i miss the good ole days, you know in 2005 when the site first started and everyone wasn't getting butt hurt over every little thing
Ford/Toyota tech.
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 10:20 PM   #8
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
96GTRagTop's Avatar
 
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 6,204
Default

i think its funny how all these companies say up 12 horsepower when they barely push out 4. Horsepower starts to add up after a while, so a car with full exhuast, full intake, upper lower CAI. I'd like to see the motor that gains 12 horsepower by changing a filter. I'll put money on the fact that it's either got 400 ponies from the factory, or 10 grand dropped into her already. I know this one kid who told me he lost half a second with a cold air kit. Of course he also told me his mass air was a blower.
__________________

Don't thank us, Rep Us
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 10:53 PM   #9
Regular
 
1998 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotia , NY
Posts: 76
Default

alright so im looking around 220 rear wheel sounds good i do have money to do more but im going of to coolege this fall it all has to be saved unless something breaks...
__________________
Quit smilin your drivin a camaro!!

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/b...iewsingle1.jpg

PI intake
March Pulleys
18x9 Black Bullit rims
msd coil packs
Stage 3 XTD King Cobra Clutch
Soon To Come:

O/r H-Pipe
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 11:34 PM   #10
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
sonicblue's Avatar
 
1990 GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
Default

most of these companies claims are bs and talking about crank hp. the only real way to find out is takl to people who have tried it and dynoed it
__________________
1990 5.0
getting all fixed up for next season
2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
 
Old May 24th, 2007, 11:47 PM   #11
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 773
Default

Originally Posted by sonicblue
most of these companies claims are bs and talking about crank hp. the only real way to find out is takl to people who have tried it and dynoed it
My point exactly, if you read it in a magazine cut a 3rd off what they claim. They pay to advertise, and if their parts do not show gains (which they always claim) how will they make money. I have been around and have seen the results alot of these parts really make. What most companies claim is usually a farse, I don't call parts a "performance part" if it only make 2 rwhp.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 01:01 AM   #12
nes
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
Default

Originally Posted by Mustang1998GT
My question for you all is that a stock 1998 Mustang GT stock with 225hp and 290ft/lbs so how would you get those numbers? I added a trick flow upper plenum and a flowmaster exhaust and get'n about 245hp! I would say you'd get about 250hp but I heard not to go with the PI shit because it highers compression and making it difficult supercharging or turbo. I would save up and get patriot heads for about 1,200 dollars and a Typhoon Intake Mainifold for 600 dollars. That would add at least 50hp if not more. I come to the conclusion that Ford shit is expensive though!



actually boost likes compression, with more compression you can run a larger pulley and put down the same power numbers as a smaller pulley if not more power, but i wont get into that. patriot heads are shitty, so is the typhoon(my buddy had issues with both) and i would love to see a dyno graph of this 245 you speek of
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 01:41 AM   #13
nes
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
Default

o0o i meant to say boost likes compression to an extent...
__________________
laser red 98 gt- stock
Originally Posted by supermachone View Post
psh dude i slit throats all the time
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 09:01 AM   #14
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Casper98GT's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
Default

actually boost likes compression
Now its youre turn for that face....

You explain to me why engine builders make engines low compression to run s/c and turbos. I will agree nitrous oxide likes higher compression. But not s/c or turbos. Youre looking at 10.4:1 compression with a PI swap...not good with 10psi of boost.
__________________
White99stang-
Damn i miss the good ole days, you know in 2005 when the site first started and everyone wasn't getting butt hurt over every little thing
Ford/Toyota tech.
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 09:57 AM   #15
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
sonicblue's Avatar
 
1990 GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
Default

exactly what casper said. boost does not like compression. how many camaros do you see running big boost on a stock motor. thats why most of them use nitrous.
__________________
1990 5.0
getting all fixed up for next season
2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 10:49 AM   #16
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Casper98GT's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
Default

exactly. most kits cme 6-8 psi TOPS. But gosh do those LS1's love the spray
__________________
White99stang-
Damn i miss the good ole days, you know in 2005 when the site first started and everyone wasn't getting butt hurt over every little thing
Ford/Toyota tech.
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 11:21 AM   #17
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
MustangMatt96GT's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
Default

What is the compresssion on those LS1's?
__________________


We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 11:44 AM   #18
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 773
Default

I'm going to throw a curveball into here, in reference to the street on pump gas high compression is not good, (curveball) I have heard that Modular race engines like the high compression as well with race fuel.
I'm not arguing the fact that the reference was made in orientation to street use, it is correct that a street car will require lower compression in order to keep the ability to run pump gas and a sufficiant amount of timing.

Just adding my .02
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 11:45 AM   #19
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
MustangMatt96GT's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
Default

Well with the higher octane gas you can run much higher compression!
__________________


We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
 
Old May 25th, 2007, 12:06 PM   #20
nes
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
Default

Originally Posted by Casper98GT
actually boost likes compression
Now its youre turn for that face....

You explain to me why engine builders make engines low compression to run s/c and turbos. I will agree nitrous oxide likes higher compression. But not s/c or turbos. Youre looking at 10.4:1 compression with a PI swap...not good with 10psi of boost.
thats y i put down my second post righ under saying to an extent...
but its very hard to explain boost+ compression= less lbs of boost but big horse power
boost + less compression = high boos numbers and huge power. as i said its pretty hard to explain, and im not the best person to explain "to the extent of what" i just know that in some cases boost is good . o0o and the pi swap wont ruin the chances of power adders for the future...
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: what RWHP am i looking at?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Much Rwhp? mystang0673 99-04 8 November 13th, 2007 07:47 PM
TRYING TO GET TO GET IN BETWEEN 375-400 RWHP. hockeytemperty 2005+ 2 May 23rd, 2007 04:19 AM
Looking for 550-600+ HP RWHP Vabeachmustang 2005+ 5 February 27th, 2007 07:11 AM
What do you think my rwhp would be with this?? 94pacecarSVT V6 Mustangs 24 January 30th, 2007 10:47 PM
EST RWHP? gtg8920 V6 Mustangs 20 January 29th, 2007 05:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.