| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotia , NY
Posts: 212
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
what RWHP am i looking at?
I have a 98 gt and im putting on a PI intake, underdrive pulleys and a msd blaster coils packs with new wire and plugs. what Hp am i looking at at the rear wheel?
__________________
Quit smilin your drivin a camaro!! ![]() Mods: Currently going through a sex-change. Going in Michael jackson coming out Kimbo Slice!! ![]() MM Cobra Member # 87 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arab, ALABAMA... out in tha cauntry...
Posts: 85
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
220-230 ish.. that's my guess...
__________________
![]() 96' "Slowbra" B&M Shifter JLT RAI No Cats Flowmasters Wheel Spacers KYB struts Eibach Springs BF Goodwrich G-Force in 4 corners. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Proud American
|
Yeah I would guess 230-235. Do you have any exhaust differences or CAI? The reason being the intake flows more air than the NPI so if you can get more in air in there through a CAI such as a JLT and then get the air out of there quicker with some exhaust mods your numbers would be higher!
BTW I could be totaly off base, but I feel that those numbers are in your ballpark!
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions Blown Small Block Ford with a hole in the block. 9.5 Dart Block 400 CI being saved for. Just because you can fuck a cactus doesn't mean you should. Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
My question for you all is that a stock 1998 Mustang GT stock with 225hp and 290ft/lbs so how would you get those numbers? I added a trick flow upper plenum and a flowmaster exhaust and get'n about 245hp! I would say you'd get about 250hp but I heard not to go with the PI shit because it highers compression and making it difficult supercharging or turbo. I would save up and get patriot heads for about 1,200 dollars and a Typhoon Intake Mainifold for 600 dollars. That would add at least 50hp if not more. I come to the conclusion that Ford shit is expensive though!
__________________
Slightly Modded 1998 Mustang GT Trick Flow Upper Plenum Flowmaster Exhaust 234/240 Camshafts 3.73 Gears |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
245 huh ? That must be at the crank, I would like to see the dyno graph on that one. I not ragging on you by any means, I'm pointing out that the parts you listed are proven to be less than stellar and will not show a 50 rwhp gain. The mods listed by shadow98gt may net a total of 225 tops, the MSD stuff will net limited power on a stock engine 1-2 rwhp on a good day.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yea you must be talking about crank hp. patriot has seemed to fix there past problems. i know several people who use them with no probs.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
I
A 1998 will dyno right around 180-190 to the rear wheels stock. I was at 201 at the rear wheels with flows, CAI, and coil packs and wires. and 206 rwhp with a tune. If You are stock with a PI intake, Underdrives, and wires and packs. I would say around 220ish. Maybe even less.
__________________
91 LX, 5spd. Ex:Toyota/Ford tech Marine Machinery Technician, Department of Defense.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Smelly Fists, Socking Cocks
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 12,798
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
i think its funny how all these companies say up 12 horsepower when they barely push out 4. Horsepower starts to add up after a while, so a car with full exhuast, full intake, upper lower CAI. I'd like to see the motor that gains 12 horsepower by changing a filter. I'll put money on the fact that it's either got 400 ponies from the factory, or 10 grand dropped into her already. I know this one kid who told me he lost half a second with a cold air kit. Of course he also told me his mass air was a blower.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotia , NY
Posts: 212
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
alright so im looking around 220 rear wheel sounds good i do have money to do more but im going of to coolege this fall it all has to be saved unless something breaks...
__________________
Quit smilin your drivin a camaro!! ![]() Mods: Currently going through a sex-change. Going in Michael jackson coming out Kimbo Slice!! ![]() MM Cobra Member # 87 |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
most of these companies claims are bs and talking about crank hp. the only real way to find out is takl to people who have tried it and dynoed it
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
My point exactly, if you read it in a magazine cut a 3rd off what they claim. They pay to advertise, and if their parts do not show gains (which they always claim) how will they make money. I have been around and have seen the results alot of these parts really make. What most companies claim is usually a farse, I don't call parts a "performance part" if it only make 2 rwhp.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 962
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
actually boost likes compression, with more compression you can run a larger pulley and put down the same power numbers as a smaller pulley if not more power, but i wont get into that. patriot heads are shitty, so is the typhoon(my buddy had issues with both) and i would love to see a dyno graph of this 245 you speek of |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 962
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
o0o i meant to say boost likes compression to an extent...
__________________
silver 98gt, blown- sold laser red 98gt, stock- gave away stormy blue 09 mazda3-traded 09 subaru wrx- soon to be 12 sec. daily driver ![]() 1988 gt- toy
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Now its youre turn for that face....You explain to me why engine builders make engines low compression to run s/c and turbos. I will agree nitrous oxide likes higher compression. But not s/c or turbos. Youre looking at 10.4:1 compression with a PI swap...not good with 10psi of boost.
__________________
91 LX, 5spd. Ex:Toyota/Ford tech Marine Machinery Technician, Department of Defense.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
exactly what casper said. boost does not like compression. how many camaros do you see running big boost on a stock motor. thats why most of them use nitrous.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
exactly. most kits cme 6-8 psi TOPS. But gosh do those LS1's love the spray
__________________
91 LX, 5spd. Ex:Toyota/Ford tech Marine Machinery Technician, Department of Defense.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Proud American
|
What is the compresssion on those LS1's?
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions Blown Small Block Ford with a hole in the block. 9.5 Dart Block 400 CI being saved for. Just because you can fuck a cactus doesn't mean you should. Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Enthusiast
|
I'm going to throw a curveball into here, in reference to the street on pump gas high compression is not good, (curveball) I have heard that Modular race engines like the high compression as well with race fuel.
I'm not arguing the fact that the reference was made in orientation to street use, it is correct that a street car will require lower compression in order to keep the ability to run pump gas and a sufficiant amount of timing. Just adding my .02
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Proud American
|
Well with the higher octane gas you can run much higher compression!
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions Blown Small Block Ford with a hole in the block. 9.5 Dart Block 400 CI being saved for. Just because you can fuck a cactus doesn't mean you should. Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 962
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
but its very hard to explain boost+ compression= less lbs of boost but big horse power boost + less compression = high boos numbers and huge power. as i said its pretty hard to explain, and im not the best person to explain "to the extent of what" i just know that in some cases boost is good . o0o and the pi swap wont ruin the chances of power adders for the future...
|
||
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: what RWHP am i looking at?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Much Rwhp? | mystang0673 | 99-04 | 8 | November 13th, 2007 08:47 PM |
| TRYING TO GET TO GET IN BETWEEN 375-400 RWHP. | hockeytemperty | 2005 - 2010 | 2 | May 23rd, 2007 05:19 AM |
| Looking for 550-600+ HP RWHP | Vabeachmustang | 2005 - 2010 | 5 | February 27th, 2007 08:11 AM |
| What do you think my rwhp would be with this?? | 94pacecarSVT | V6 Mustangs | 24 | January 30th, 2007 11:47 PM |
| EST RWHP? | gtg8920 | V6 Mustangs | 20 | January 29th, 2007 06:28 PM |