![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing what RWHP am i looking at? in the 96-98 Forum. I have a 98 gt and im putting on a PI intake, underdrive pulleys and ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotia , NY
Posts: 76
|
what RWHP am i looking at?
__________________
Quit smilin your drivin a camaro!! http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/b...iewsingle1.jpg PI intake March Pulleys 18x9 Black Bullit rims msd coil packs Stage 3 XTD King Cobra Clutch Soon To Come: O/r H-Pipe |
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arab, ALABAMA... out in tha cauntry...
Posts: 86
|
220-230 ish.. that's my guess...
__________________
http://a598.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...2851335ded.jpg 96' "Slowbra" B&M Shifter JLT RAI No Cats Flowmasters Wheel Spacers KYB struts Eibach Springs BF Goodwrich G-Force in 4 corners. |
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
|
Yeah I would guess 230-235. Do you have any exhaust differences or CAI? The reason being the intake flows more air than the NPI so if you can get more in air in there through a CAI such as a JLT and then get the air out of there quicker with some exhaust mods your numbers would be higher!
BTW I could be totaly off base, but I feel that those numbers are in your ballpark!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
|
My question for you all is that a stock 1998 Mustang GT stock with 225hp and 290ft/lbs so how would you get those numbers? I added a trick flow upper plenum and a flowmaster exhaust and get'n about 245hp! I would say you'd get about 250hp but I heard not to go with the PI shit because it highers compression and making it difficult supercharging or turbo. I would save up and get patriot heads for about 1,200 dollars and a Typhoon Intake Mainifold for 600 dollars. That would add at least 50hp if not more. I come to the conclusion that Ford shit is expensive though!
__________________
Slightly Modded 1998 Mustang GT Trick Flow Upper Plenum Flowmaster Exhaust 234/240 Camshafts 3.73 Gears |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 773
|
245 huh ? That must be at the crank, I would like to see the dyno graph on that one. I not ragging on you by any means, I'm pointing out that the parts you listed are proven to be less than stellar and will not show a 50 rwhp gain. The mods listed by shadow98gt may net a total of 225 tops, the MSD stuff will net limited power on a stock engine 1-2 rwhp on a good day.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
|
yea you must be talking about crank hp. patriot has seemed to fix there past problems. i know several people who use them with no probs.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
|
I
A 1998 will dyno right around 180-190 to the rear wheels stock. I was at 201 at the rear wheels with flows, CAI, and coil packs and wires. and 206 rwhp with a tune. If You are stock with a PI intake, Underdrives, and wires and packs. I would say around 220ish. Maybe even less.
__________________
White99stang-
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech |
||
|
|
#8 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 6,204
|
i think its funny how all these companies say up 12 horsepower when they barely push out 4. Horsepower starts to add up after a while, so a car with full exhuast, full intake, upper lower CAI. I'd like to see the motor that gains 12 horsepower by changing a filter. I'll put money on the fact that it's either got 400 ponies from the factory, or 10 grand dropped into her already. I know this one kid who told me he lost half a second with a cold air kit. Of course he also told me his mass air was a blower.
__________________
Don't thank us, Rep Us |
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotia , NY
Posts: 76
|
alright so im looking around 220 rear wheel sounds good i do have money to do more but im going of to coolege this fall it all has to be saved unless something breaks...
__________________
Quit smilin your drivin a camaro!! http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/b...iewsingle1.jpg PI intake March Pulleys 18x9 Black Bullit rims msd coil packs Stage 3 XTD King Cobra Clutch Soon To Come: O/r H-Pipe |
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
|
most of these companies claims are bs and talking about crank hp. the only real way to find out is takl to people who have tried it and dynoed it
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 773
|
My point exactly, if you read it in a magazine cut a 3rd off what they claim. They pay to advertise, and if their parts do not show gains (which they always claim) how will they make money. I have been around and have seen the results alot of these parts really make. What most companies claim is usually a farse, I don't call parts a "performance part" if it only make 2 rwhp.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
actually boost likes compression, with more compression you can run a larger pulley and put down the same power numbers as a smaller pulley if not more power, but i wont get into that. patriot heads are shitty, so is the typhoon(my buddy had issues with both) and i would love to see a dyno graph of this 245 you speek of |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
o0o i meant to say boost likes compression to an extent...
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
|
Now its youre turn for that face....You explain to me why engine builders make engines low compression to run s/c and turbos. I will agree nitrous oxide likes higher compression. But not s/c or turbos. Youre looking at 10.4:1 compression with a PI swap...not good with 10psi of boost.
__________________
White99stang-
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech |
||
|
|
#15 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
|
exactly what casper said. boost does not like compression. how many camaros do you see running big boost on a stock motor. thats why most of them use nitrous.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
|
exactly. most kits cme 6-8 psi TOPS. But gosh do those LS1's love the spray
__________________
White99stang-
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
|
What is the compresssion on those LS1's?
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 773
|
I'm going to throw a curveball into here, in reference to the street on pump gas high compression is not good, (curveball) I have heard that Modular race engines like the high compression as well with race fuel.
I'm not arguing the fact that the reference was made in orientation to street use, it is correct that a street car will require lower compression in order to keep the ability to run pump gas and a sufficiant amount of timing. Just adding my .02
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
#19 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
|
Well with the higher octane gas you can run much higher compression!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
but its very hard to explain boost+ compression= less lbs of boost but big horse power boost + less compression = high boos numbers and huge power. as i said its pretty hard to explain, and im not the best person to explain "to the extent of what" i just know that in some cases boost is good . o0o and the pi swap wont ruin the chances of power adders for the future...
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: what RWHP am i looking at?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Much Rwhp? | mystang0673 | 99-04 | 8 | November 13th, 2007 07:47 PM |
| TRYING TO GET TO GET IN BETWEEN 375-400 RWHP. | hockeytemperty | 2005+ | 2 | May 23rd, 2007 04:19 AM |
| Looking for 550-600+ HP RWHP | Vabeachmustang | 2005+ | 5 | February 27th, 2007 07:11 AM |
| What do you think my rwhp would be with this?? | 94pacecarSVT | V6 Mustangs | 24 | January 30th, 2007 10:47 PM |
| EST RWHP? | gtg8920 | V6 Mustangs | 20 | January 29th, 2007 05:28 PM |