| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Enthusiast
'02 VERT
13.08@106.11
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 646
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Not everybody like myself I did that last lol Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
__________________
CMS STAGE II FRPP 4.10s LTS, O/R H, FLOWMASTER WELD ONS EDELBROCK INTAKE MHS 6061 ELBOW NX PLATE 100 SHOT SCT X3 TUNED BY JOE MANSFIELD AT ABOVE AND BEYOND PERFORMANCE |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
4v Know-it-all
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 488
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You can't get the ratio wrong if you count correctly. How hard can it be? Count the driveshaft revolutions while turning the wheel one revoultion.
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
|
You can get it wrong. If its an open diff, ad you only spin oone wheel it will read wrong. If one wheel is stationary it will show 1/2 of what the actual ratio is.
__________________
1991 Mustang LX 2.3L 5 Speed convert 1989 Ranger 4X4 2.3L 5 Speed Entire turbo kit waiting to be used again. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
4v Know-it-all
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 488
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm aware of that, but how many mustangs GTs have open differentials?
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
However easy it may be, it's still easier to just look at your tach when you're cruising on the highway, lol.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
4v Know-it-all
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 488
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Enthusiast
1998 mustang cobra
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: pa
Posts: 617
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
agreed. i had a 91 tsi with a small 16g, and on 15psi with a 12.0 a/f, that thing was wiiiicked.
__________________
HP twin turbo - 691hp/608tq with 15lbs huffed in (old setup) comin soon...ON3 turbo kit, PTE7175 |
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Stang GT
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 1,468
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
2002 GT Premium: A few bolt ons and such. My garage if you want to know. ![]() ![]() http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-37069/ |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned
1997 cougar 4.6 1/2PI
TooFast4theFUZZ
Join Date: May 2011
Location: se wi
Posts: 991
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
pfft, talons...my bro had one witha 16G turbo and blablabla..my 4.6 cougar was almost stock at that time and id beat him off the line all day upto 100+ but if we did a jump and he was spooled up id lose but by only 1/2 car length..and if that tsi is awd he has to divide up that HP..i have surprised alot of cars with this lil ole 4.6
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
If your friend thinks his talon is 350whp he needs to lay off the crack pipe. Stock turbo trim talons are not quick im sorry.
__________________
MM FOBRA CLUB MEMBER #1 |
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Pacific Green Cobra
14.80 No traction
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,216
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
350rwhp ??? Tell him when he wakes up out his dream that i want a hit too
__________________
GT ENGINE (temporary) 4.30 Gears , 31 spline Moser axles , Detroit tru Trac diff, Jmod 4r70w , Pi intake Hitech stage 2 cam, Vortech V2 3.33 pulley. Alum drive shaft. Lowering kit x2 ball joints ,screamin demon coils, LCA " |
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Regular
1998 mustang gt
to be announced
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: halifax PA
Posts: 51
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
my one friend has a talon similar to these specs and i use to own a 2008 civic si stock and his and mine were close and he pulled more in 4th gear. It sounds to me that the talon even though high in the horse power probably lacks a lot of bottom end torque which where u with a v8 has a little more get up and go and usually the torque ranges from a v8 mustang are higher then horse power. I would have to say v8 beats 4 cylinders because they lack the torque that a v8 produces plus, turbos are well known for lag so if this talon so has 350hp he is probably running like shit because of not tuned tell your buddy to just sell it and buy a older 5.0 alot cheaper to build and will hold up a hell of a lot better.
Change your gears to 4.10s and you will probably walk all over him |
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 179
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
this an old thread but what the hell i cant tell from the pics but is the first intake runner (right behind the alternator) going to the driver side of the engine or passenger side if its driver then its a pi intake if its got that why not the whole swap explains why ur coil pack is sitting low that might explain some of that mysterious spunk
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 179
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
man i dont know how to use this shit lol
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Regular
1998 Mustang GT Convert.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 293
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i think your all nuts. i think its a torque issue more than anything. my vert has 2.73s but the stock 4.6 has like close if not 300 ft.lb. and thats where you get your accel from. not hp. i crude anology would be if you had a motor with 500hp and 200 ft.lbs of torque you would take a while to accel but top end speed would be 200+mph giving wonderful conditions to power to weight and gearing and all that. my stock 4.6 auto vert will role up to about 135ish mph before the poor thing loses its breathe. but even with 2.73s in it, it will throw you in the seat given the right weather conditions and all. imports and all have decent hp but not alot have massive torque. thats why those big body chevys like your chevelles could move like they did was because they had a big torquey motor in them granted the hp they put out. bary the needle in both cars and hell beat you. but pulling through the gears from red light to red light or how ever you do it, youll take him every time. thats my opinion. i know people. theres alot of holes in it too. lol but consider the torque, its not always about hp...
__________________
98 Mustang GT Convert. 95 Mustang GT 5.0L |
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Rollin' 18/ pushin' 2
|
135 is the rev limiter.
__________________
![]() MODS IN GARAGE NCMM ORIGINAL BLOWN 96-98 CREW MEMBER # 1 |
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Regular
1998 mustang gt
to be announced
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: halifax PA
Posts: 51
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: My Mustang Shouldnt be as fast as it is..
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why he/she shouldnt be a mod!!! | Till | Forum Games | 34 | July 3rd, 2010 06:41 PM |
| how fast have you been in your mustang | Drgnracin72 | The Clubhouse | 81 | March 19th, 2008 12:56 AM |
| Shouldnt this be... | mustangmanic | The Clubhouse | 29 | December 13th, 2007 01:59 AM |
| Fast Mustang | Stangzilla | Videos | 2 | March 3rd, 2007 12:46 PM |
| Shouldnt This Fit On A 94 Mustang? | King Mustang | V6 Mustangs | 6 | September 21st, 2006 11:44 PM |