![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing New Setup :-) in the 96-98 Forum. Well revised my setup that i think I am going to get. This is also ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 88
|
New Setup :-)
Well revised my setup that i think I am going to get. This is also my DD. I got something else for my weekend warrior.
Setup: Steeda G-Trac 1 & 2 (Open to suggestions on suspension) 4:10's D/R 75mm TB Plenum JLT CAI Pi Intake Stage 2 Crower Cams (Springs & Retainers) Shorty Headers (Open to suggestions) What kind of reliability will I lose with the cams? What horsepower and track numbers will I be looking at? Thanks
__________________
'98 Mustang GT CAI, X-Pipe, Pypes Catback, Tri-Ax '96 Eclipse Gs-T Drop In K/N, T-2Gay @ 15psi, BSEK |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
probably not much, u should be around 240-250rwhp, do lts, and probably around 13.5 ish with good driving(plz cut better then a 2.4 60ft) and i will constantly suggest pi heads with an after market cam and the thicker head gaskets (since u plan on FI) u will like it much more and with the right tune could possibly see 280-290rwhp and be deep in the 12s... just my suggestion
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 88
|
I don't think i am going to do FI on the car. Like i said its my dd and if i sank the cost of a super charger in my DSM then my DSM would eat most Super Charged 4.6. 240 seems low
__________________
'98 Mustang GT CAI, X-Pipe, Pypes Catback, Tri-Ax '96 Eclipse Gs-T Drop In K/N, T-2Gay @ 15psi, BSEK |
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: findlay, Ohio
Posts: 65
|
240 is good for a 96-98 but low for the 99-04's. just get the P.I. heads too along with stage II cams and hit 270-290rwhp with a good tune and call it a day!
__________________
97 black Mustang GT 5-speed(fully loaded) mods - MGW short throw, Steeda race pedels, K&N drop in, Flowmaster 40's coming soon - orh, JLT CAI, 4.10's, P.I. intake, P.I. cams, underdrives pullies, and other bolt-ons shooting for 240rwhp |
|
|
#5 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 3,861
|
280-290 with a SC and a tune? thats all? geez these mod motors really are turds
|
|
|
#6 |
|
On Probation
Millenium Falcon
"Just Living the Dream"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 7,818
|
280-290 with only a 9psi sc. With more boost u can easily put over 350 to the wheels. But then your going to need to rip apart the internals otherwise your eventually going to fry something.
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 3,861
|
Im wanting around 300 to the wheels, using cams, stock heads, PI intake, boltons and a SC. Seem possible?
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
i meant 280-290 NA.
i think with your stock heads,pi cams, pi intake, and an sc u could see 350rwhp with a safe tune pretty easily. if 300 is ur goal, stop modding now and save for ur sc, there is nothing else on the earth like a supercharged mustang lol. especially when you already love them, u will love them even more |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 880
|
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
|
||
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 880
|
. First of all these heads are all I work on to improve both PI and NPI, now I have even moved into working on Svo heads. You can continue to believe what you are told or what read read in your magazines. Spend the same amount of money on each head in porting and valve work and you will see the npi far betters the P.I accrossed the board. Sure you can focus all you want on cfm numbers (the amount of air that is moved thru the runner) however that doesn't show a working power making cylinder head.So my challenge disprove the numbers I have, show me the intake pulse charges from a P.I head and velocity. As I always move the topic to, if the P.I is so great why did frpp make the svo head from the npi casting. We all know the Svo heads out of the box outf;ow and out perform almost all ported heads (P.I). Evenyullay I will talk Casper into allowing me to get a sticky showing these numbers from not only my source but many others that have proven the facts I am stating. LOL, no need I have noth ing to prove, more like the P.I people need to prove their "theories". Even stock the number are so close you can't base a decision of what is better. People talk about the intake port mismatch, it has been show and documented that a minor mismatch will actually help with a restricted air intake system by altering the intake air pulses to produce 4-7 rwhp gains. Not something I made up at all, most NASCAR teams do this on their restrictor plate motors to increase or overcome the smaller plate openings. Yes the P.I intake runners have a little more area that can be removed but also suffer from a horrible short side radius at the troat area and show a large turbulance and velocity lose when ported wrong. The small turn on the entry area to the throat also hinders the direct path to the bowl area. I short you would have to add material to a P.I head to make it flow the high lift numbers the npi's are capible of. With a little more engineering time ford could have produced a much better alternative to the P.I head, under the deadlines and time restraints they used what worked. Reading up on the Laws of continuity have changed many peoples train of thought.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|||
|
|
#12 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
i never said the pis flow better then npis anywhere(if i did i didnt mean to) what my theory is that the npis dont leave much of any room to grow, as far as the aftermarket parts go, the pis will always be surperior as for that. i would love to see these flow numbers and what not(i dont doubt they exist) i just will continue to remain firm with what i say regaurdless of the flow numbers, and charts until i see npi cars out there showing the evidence...anyway its late, i probably shouldnt be typing i gotta be early but its blah...
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Albertville, AL
Posts: 3,861
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
|
I cant wait for this to blow up....
__________________
White99stang-
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech |
||
|
|
#15 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
|
Everyone I'e talked to that have PI heads say they never regret it. I'm actually doing it myself. But it DOES depend on what your total outcome of the car will be. You said you're not going to FI it. Then go with the PI's. Since you don't have to worry about the higher compression causing problems (b/c again, you're not FI) then that extra power you get from having the PI heads wouldn't hurt. But I agree with casper...This debate could go on forever.
__________________
Parting out 2003 SVT Cobra Air/Fuel http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...003-cobra.html Engine http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...003-cobra.html |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NEW HAMPSHIRE
Posts: 2,365
|
WHY....Thats the main thing here i wanna know.
WHY do you think PI own Npis. You need to backup why you think they are superoir and where you got the information. How are they better in the long run ?
__________________
White99stang-
93 LX, H/C/I + Vortech |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
o0o and flow charts and what not dont mean much, without a dyno graph of the npis vs pis i could care less... i dont mean to completely bash npis in general but im just saying the pis are worth the 300 dollars you may spend on them in the long run...
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 880
|
I will tell you you are a complete utter MORON. The "claims" you make show you have little to no knowledge about these motors. I have seen a guy bolt on a P.I intake and cams with a tune pick up 48 rwhp. The only true gain with the P.I head is the compression bump due to a smaller combustion chamber. To say a flow chart doesn't mean much is like saying John force should run a V-tec. A dyno is a instrument used to tune a vehicle to achieve optimal performance, just because one car makes more than another doesn't mean it will be faster. How the power is put down to the ground is what makes a car fast. FACTS !!!!!!! 1 . bolting on the P.I intake is worth 15-20 rwhp average 2 bolting on the P.I cam is wrth another 15-25 rwhp 3 The little bit of rtv it takes to install the intake will not leak, for that matter a little tig welding would be 100% insurance of no leaks. 4 the compression bump from the P.I head is worth 5-10 rwhp YOU HAVE YET TO POST ONE FACT, BUT CONTINUE TO POST OPINIONS Now that I've had to put you over my knee like a 4 year old a give you a verbal whooping, shut your pie hole.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 948
|
) but in reality the track times are what matters.ps i know the comp cams 262s and 270s both have a lift of .500 so lets not get into a knowledge debate, they are simply not for my setup and not for many others. (even though they are a good street cam) but lets look at some more dyno numbers shall we, lets see a npi mustang with the pi intake and comp cams 262s with boltons and a tune will have what 255-260 rwhp (some1 back me up on this i know thats pretty accurate) but a pi car with the same cams and bolons will put down 270 -280 rwhp, i cant believe there is arguement over more horsepower like said b4 this debate can go on all day, y dont we end it with saying to each his own |
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: New Setup :-)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| anyone have this setup | KhaosGT | 99-04 | 2 | November 3rd, 2007 11:18 PM |
| Car setup | acehogg69 | 2005+ | 3 | May 17th, 2007 08:17 AM |
| EFI Setup | litlegto | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | October 24th, 2006 01:09 PM |
| need help on SC setup | 96stangboi | 96-98 | 1 | October 19th, 2006 02:22 PM |
| My M90 V6 Setup | ssajdowitz | V6 Mustangs | 27 | September 29th, 2006 12:21 AM |