| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
So..why does the hp/trq decrease over the years?
I'm trying to find out all reasons I can to see why our cars lose hp. I see how one guy's (Matt I think) said his puts out 192hp and 220 ft/lbs in his 96. All I can think of is:
worn spark plugs/ignition wires crappy walmart air filters deposits in throttle body,fuel injectors, cylinder walls, etc. worn out exhaust pipes (maybe) Anything else? I would like to get my car as close back to 215/285 as it can. This isn't important just something I'd like to know for future reference. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,028
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
ur car never was at 215 to the wheels. The hp number we get from the factory is an engine estimate. By the time the power runs down through the drivetrain we generally ten to loose 20-30 hp.
Matts car is a really bad example to get numbers from. His car wasn't tested under optimal conditions. His altittude is about 6000ft higher then sea level, which we all no thin air isn't good for anything. ur best bet to actually put 215 to the wheels is upgrade ur coils n wires, ditch ur cats, pi intake manifold, and good plenum, tb combo with a plastic CAI |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
20-30hp from the drivetrain, damn that sucks. If I'm lucky I'm putting out 170. No wonder the new models with a v6 can still give me a good run.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
|
i dk about ditching the cats i heard you loose torque
__________________
-BBK CAI, BASSANI CB + X, SCT 93 tune, 4.10s, Cobra brakes, Cobra R wrapped in nitto 555 tire. -College Football and studies take up the bulk of my time. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Port, NC
Posts: 717
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
you can loose a little torqu and hp in the bottom end, but you gain more in the top end b/c the engine can breath better.
__________________
Mustangless atm 2006 2500 HD Diesel. Built allison trans and other goodies
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
__________________
-BBK CAI, BASSANI CB + X, SCT 93 tune, 4.10s, Cobra brakes, Cobra R wrapped in nitto 555 tire. -College Football and studies take up the bulk of my time. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm not too crazy about having to rev near 6k just to reach peak hp. I hate that. To me 4400 is a good spot.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
IBEATU
06 GT, 98 GT, & 93 Notch
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Douglasville, GA
Posts: 5,937
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yea my 98 doesnt dyno much better with everything that I've done to it. Dissapointing really, I gotta do the pi conversion!!
__________________
![]() 98 GT: some stuff 06 GT: more stuff 93 Notch: 4 cyl at birth, now 5.0 drivetrain and stock exterior and interior= True Sleeper Paxton/Vortech Crew Member #3 FRPP's #1 Dealer Injected Engineering BMR Suspension |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
^What are you pulling?
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,028
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yeah, I know. I know the PIs get most of their power around 5800 or so for some but that's so close to redline and it takes longer to rev it up that high.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,028
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
6 k isn't really that close to redlining. Simple solution to taking to long to rev that high.........gears. Put some 3.73 or 4.10's and u'll get up there right quick
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
What do 96s come with?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Proud American
|
2.73s, 3.08s, or 3.27s!
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions 25.3 SFI Chassis Build Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I have a GT 5 speed. Which one's that?
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Oh, and you know what, I've never seen a pi intake manifold for sale that doesn't say it needs the pi heads. so how did you guys do that?
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,028
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ap-vt1878.html
you should be able to find all your answers about a PI intake swap to NPI heads. If your stumpted somewhere along the way, just post a question in there and I'm sure someone will post an answer |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Oh ok, I see. He just siliconed the area on the npi head to avoid the coolant leak. Ehh, guess it works especially if you don't want to spend over a grand on new heads too.
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Proud American
|
I can show you pictures of how much to use too!
What does you axle code say on your build sticker in the jam of the drivers door? If its M = 2.73s and the rest I can tell you if you need me too!
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions 25.3 SFI Chassis Build Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 61
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yeah, it's an M. Damn, I expected it to be 3 something. Cause I found a formula for calculating the speed and rpm based on the gears and differential and 3.55 I think was close to what I get. Maybe 2.73s will be more accurate.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: So..why does the hp/trq decrease over the years?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Quickly Years Go By! | WAR-PARTY | The Clubhouse | 7 | September 23rd, 2007 04:59 PM |
| ChrisJ 40 years later | TurboLX | The Clubhouse | 5 | September 20th, 2007 05:47 PM |
| where will you be in 2 years | MicronXD | The Clubhouse | 17 | August 23rd, 2007 02:55 PM |
| Differences between the years? | Reset | 99-04 | 11 | July 22nd, 2007 01:43 AM |
| Only took me 19 years to get one. | DarthShanka | New Members Introductions | 9 | January 8th, 2007 12:24 PM |