![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Upper and Lower Control arms! in the 96-98 Forum. Okay so I am taking boomers advise of doing the suspension first! He suggests the ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
14.631@93.51 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 6,997
|
Upper and Lower Control arms!Thanks!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 751
|
Hey Matt,
I will suggest a lakewood 50/50 rear shock with a drag specific rate spring. I just picked up a set of Moroso drag springs and will be giving them a shot. If you plan to run a drag radial you may want to try a adjustable upper, radials have a tendancy to break things as they shock the drivetrain when launching. Adjusting the pinion angle will help keep u-joint under the car.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
14.631@93.51 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 6,997
|
How would I adjust them? and is it something I have to have a shop do to get it right? And I just did new shocks and struts 10000-1500 miles ago, but I regret not going with a drag shock such as the strange or lakewoods! How do I measure the pinion angle and know its correct? And is it nessisary to take the shocks and springs out? Thanks!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 751
|
Yes , you need to remove the springs and shocks as well...... I should have been more clear on that, sorry...
As far as setting up the pinion angle you really need to have the car leveled and lifted with the suspension loaded (fully weight of the car). Here is a little something for you to read it describes the process.. http://www.wolferacecraft.com/pinionangle.aspx
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
14.631@93.51 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 6,997
|
Thanks I will read that right now!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 751
|
Also adjusting the angle will help the overall geometry and help to lower 60', again do not plan to make a full pass the first run as you will need to work on it at the track. Bring four jack stands and a jack just in case you need to make any adjustments, if the car feels like is tracking straight it may not be. You need someone at the rear of the car to watch and I would highly suggest only making at the most a 330' pass, if it is on the caster adjustment it could cause you to wreck on the big end.
Example; my old drag car (with fully adjustable rear suspension) took 14 60' passes to get set up right. It dog walked (from wrong caster) the first 5 and then finding the pinion angle and trying different mounting points to get it to a true straight rear. If I would have made full passes on my first 10 I would have ate the wall.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
14.631@93.51 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 6,997
|
Well I wouldnt mind doing that! My 60 foots are terrible! lol 2.4-2.6 is my normal 60 foot time! Are the Mega Bites jrs ajustable? And how much should I plan on spending with the new shocks springs and everything? Thanks alot!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 751
|
Moroso trick springs $95 (set)pn# 47510, Hpm mega bite jrs. pn# HPM-5520-DZ $269.00, lakewood 50/50 shocks $40 a pc. Uppers will depend on the brand.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
14.631@93.51 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 6,997
|
By doing this would I ruin any of my daily driveablity? And which would be a better set up and would work the best for a daily driver/ strip car?
http://www.steeda.com/products/hd_ad...ntrol_arms.php http://www.steeda.com/products/tubul...ontrol_arm.php http://www.steeda.com/products/alumi...ntrol_arms.php
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 751
|
The 555-4100 is fully adjustable, retains the use of bushings and it will not hamper daily driving. You want bushings on something that will be driven daily and does not have reinforced torque boxes.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
14.631@93.51 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 6,997
|
Well it looks like I am going to have to spend nearly 750 bucks for the suspension with shipping! And then I am going to have to fine tune it! Looks like I will be saving for a little while longer!! 4.10s will be going in first and I cant decide if I should wait and get a 31 spline diff and axles or stick with stock! Man I wish I had the money!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Upper and Lower Control arms!
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For those with Upper/Lower Control Arms... | the real shocker | 99-04 | 26 | September 19th, 2007 05:49 AM |
| upper and lower control arms | kreil45 | For Sale | 3 | June 11th, 2007 09:01 AM |
| bbk upper and lower control arms | sonicblue | For Sale | 8 | March 28th, 2007 06:20 PM |
| Upper And Lower Control Arms | Tony_90fox | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | February 27th, 2007 12:57 PM |
| bbk upper and lower control arms | sonicblue | For Sale | 2 | January 27th, 2007 08:21 PM |