Octane vs Compression
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 96-98

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old September 16th, 2007, 04:08 PM   #1
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

Octane vs Compression


How high can your Compression Ratio be before you need to worry about runner really high octane (High meaning above 91-93)? I know after the PI swap my C/R will be about 10.4:1. But plus a turbo with 5 psi my C/R will obviously raise, so when do I need to worry about special fuel?
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old September 16th, 2007, 05:37 PM   #2
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 941
Boomer is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Boomer Send a message via Yahoo to Boomer
Default

You will be okay, you will have to pull a bit of timing but it should be okay. You may want a tune for "special" fuels for at the track.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
  Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2007, 08:50 PM   #3
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 210
memphismustang87 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Does the DiabloSport Tuner not set it to run best at a 93 octane? Just wonderin, cuz my hypertech tuner did. It would make a pingin noise if I used lower.
__________________
98GT 5spd,KYB shocks & springs,K&N,new plugs & FR Wires,BBK O/R H-Pipe,Flows,Pro50 short-throw,Bullit DD Rims,2.5% tint,4.10 gears,Proj. Headlights,Mach I Shaker
  Reply With Quote
Old September 16th, 2007, 09:22 PM   #4
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

10.4:1 with a forced induction is asking for problems...
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 03:31 AM   #5
mm's nitrous mod
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
SWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud of
iTrader: 8 reviews
Default

on a very conservative tune, it will be ok. you will have to make sure who ever tunes it know exactly what they are doing. that is a lot of pressure in the cylinders.
__________________


project warhorse under construction
wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning)

being built by MP2 Performance
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 05:59 AM   #6
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

What do you think my C/R will be after the turbo? And it would be a conservative tune. I don't want to go over 400HP. I want 370-390. Which should put me at about 4-5 psi. Definately not more than 6.

Darrell - I was reading a post from a little while back where someone said they heard that a PI swap + FI will cause problems. And I believe ver batim you wrote, "Someone fed you a line of crap".
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 06:33 AM   #7
mm's nitrous mod
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
SWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud of
iTrader: 8 reviews
Default

cylinder pressure will go up quiet a bit, and 5-6psi is hardly worth the $$$. if it was me, i would invest into an all motor set up. guys that do a p.i. swap with vt heads, cams, and header back have seen 99rwhp. throw that with cai, t/b, plenum, udp's, mid pipe, cat back, and a hell of a tune you can see around 350rwhp.
__________________


project warhorse under construction
wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning)

being built by MP2 Performance
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 07:15 AM   #8
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

My dilema is that I already have EVERYTHING for the PI swap...lol. I wasn't planning on going FI for a while. But I fell into some cash, and I have turbo kit put together dirt cheap. So I would really like to boost it. And you can only get so far on a N/A engine before it starts to cost an ass load of money. I was also going to get forged internals in about a year so be able to handle more HP. I've been told by a couple of shops that 10.4:1 is the highest I'll see before the turbo. And just like you said, with a conservative tune, high octane gas, and they are estimating about 14*-18* of timing I should be okay, even if I want to run it hard.

But I want to get everyone's side of the story before I jump into it.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 09:21 AM   #9
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by AnglicoGT98
What do you think my C/R will be after the turbo? And it would be a conservative tune. I don't want to go over 400HP. I want 370-390. Which should put me at about 4-5 psi. Definately not more than 6.

Darrell - I was reading a post from a little while back where someone said they heard that a PI swap + FI will cause problems. And I believe ver batim you wrote, "Someone fed you a line of crap".
Refresh my memory. What do you mean FI? Fuel injection or forced induction or what? People loose me with abbreviations because they could mean anything. How do you know you are at 10.4:1 anyway? Is that what it calculates out to be or is that what someone said? I could have swore the guys I talked to around here said per measuring and the mathmatical formula the compression comes out to be around 9.6:1. I could be wrong though. Its been along time since I've heard anyone make that swap around here.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 09:42 AM   #10
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 941
Boomer is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Boomer Send a message via Yahoo to Boomer
Default

One thing being overlooked here is 10.4:1 is only static compression ratio, you can go over 400 easlily with 5lbs. The combo will determine a lot of what power you will make. It will be safe if the tune is "safe", you are going to be running less timing to make it safe. The diablo software in capatable hands is a very good tuning device.
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 01:03 PM   #11
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

Yeah sorry about the abbreviations. I was using FI as Forced Induction. I was using 10.4:1 as the highest my compression ratio would be. I don't want to plan for it to be 9.7:1, buy all the shit, and then find out it is too high. You know what I mean?

What do you mean by static compression ratio? I assume it means when the car is static and not at WOT, like idleing or something?? And if I hit 400HP with only 3 or 4psi (just an example) then that's all I would go for. The amount of boost the car has isn't my goal. It's the 400 horsepower mark that I'm after. And FYI, this WILL be intercooled.

Will running colder plugs help anything??
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 01:14 PM   #12
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,598
ModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

The normal compression on a PI engine is around 9.5 but due to a different design in the 96-96 pistons. With the same heads and everything Our cars actually make about 10.2-10.4:1. The forced induction is doable with any compression really, you just can't run high boost. There are TT NSX's with 11:1 stock compression, plus turbos at 8 psi. When you add boost you are creating higher compression. But, if you read the articles posted by MM&FF. They have tested compression ratio's related to boost. With the same artificial compression (teh compression after applying the boost) you will make a set range of power. However, the limitation, is that with a lower compression engine and more boost, you can get away with lower octane fuel. But with a higher compression engine you have a much higher chance of detonation, and there for less timing so slightly less power.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 02:42 PM   #13
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

Just spoke to the shop that would be tuning my car (Mustang Specialties). The tech over there said realisticly that a my '98 with 70K will have a 10:1 no higher than 10.2:1 after the swap. If I don't go over 5psi Intercooled then I will be okay. They said they can tune it to run on 93 octane and pull timing so I won't detonate. He also said that I can have combustion chambers opened up a little bit to lower the C/R a tad if I really wanted to. And I trust this shop 100%, they sponsor my cousins 7 second 5.0.
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 05:45 PM   #14
mm's nitrous mod
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
SWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud of
iTrader: 8 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by AnglicoGT98
Will running colder plugs help anything??
any time you start running a power adder or push more through a stock power adder, you are suppose to change plugs. colder and a copper version.
__________________


project warhorse under construction
wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning)

being built by MP2 Performance
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 09:23 PM   #15
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

So NGK Iridium would not be good for a power adder? I saw these plugs that run 10* colder or something...would that be more ideal?
  Reply With Quote
Old September 17th, 2007, 09:28 PM   #16
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by AnglicoGT98
So NGK Iridium would not be good for a power adder? I saw these plugs that run 10* colder or something...would that be more ideal?
Spark plugs have nothing to do with temperature. A colder plug disipates heat faster than a hotter plug. It doesn't make the engine run colder.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2007, 07:25 AM   #17
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

I know it doesn't change engine temp. What I am asking is, an Iridium plug would not be as good as a copper plug that is said to run colder or do iridium plugs already run colder??
  Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2007, 08:34 AM   #18
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: warren, Mi
Posts: 941
Boomer is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Boomer Send a message via Yahoo to Boomer
Default

Iridium are junk IMO on a modular. Static compression ratio is taking all the numbers and crunching them, dynamic compression the actual base compression when figuring for timing events. Valve overlap will lower dynamic compression.;
__________________
Just another 10 second Mustang, what did you expect ? http://youtube.com/watch?v=BgykaUrmfvM
  Reply With Quote
Old September 18th, 2007, 01:04 PM   #19
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 630
AnglicoGT98 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to AnglicoGT98
Default

Okay that makes sense. So what would be the best thing to pick up? I guess I'll go with those plugs I saw that are copper and say they burn 10* colder than stock plugs.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Octane vs Compression
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octane Fastback91 Classic Mustangs 18 November 25th, 2007 07:48 PM
93 octane? petrol_head 5.0 Mustangs 9 July 16th, 2007 08:12 PM
Gas octane ByPopularDemand V6 Mustangs 11 May 6th, 2007 08:30 PM
Which Octane? bostonbands 2005 - 2010 4 December 2nd, 2006 10:05 PM
Low compression and low Octane? brad65 5.0 Mustangs 5 July 28th, 2006 04:53 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.