| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
engine options?
Well, Ive been going round an round in my head about which path I want to go with my swap. Im consider one of two options: an allumium 4.6 2v or a 5.4 2v I'd like oppinions on pros and cons of both, including cost performance etc. As far as the 5.4 goes ive heard mixed things about the weight, some say its a tank, while others say it only weighs a little more, some say its nothing but a torque motor, and has no place in a sports car, others say it makes the 4.6 look terribly weak. My problem is that I havent seen in 1/4 mile data to back up the 5.4 as a good swap. Now the alluminum block 4.6 intrigues me because of weight savings, which leads to better e/ts and improved handling, but I won't get crazy tq like I would from the 5.4, and im not sure were to look to find one of these motors, im not even sure which cars they come in, or which blocks are good ect. Another thing that bugs me is I just recently got a spec clutch, and alluminum flywheel, for my car, which is 6 bolt design, and from what ive heard the 5.4 takes the 8 bolt design, so I'd have to get new ones, is this the same story for the alluminum block 4.6 too? Any and all help/oppinions is appreciated.
Thanks
__________________
1998 GT FRPP: 4.10s, Alluminum d/s STEEDA:upper/lowers, springs, cc plates, tri-ax TOKICO: Adjustable shocks SPEC: alluminum flywheel K&N: Intake Screamin Demon ignition ram: clutch ----------------------- BUCK OFAMA |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 302
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
My 5.4 drives just like my 4.6 but it has a crap load more grunt. There's no making a 4.6 match the 5.4 build for build/mod for mod. The 5.4 engine and all the stuff to get it in weighs 25-50lbs (depending on the block year) more than the 4.6 so all the weight crap is just a bunch of hooey.
My car has scored kills on: a S197 Shelby GT Mustang, a well modded 350z, a last gen camaro and a NA 01 cobra to date and it's not even tuned right. It revs fast and clean to 6000rpm (built bottom, cams, ported heads, intake) or slightly above, blows the tires off at any suggestion and makes a fun street and track car. I raced the thing in AutoX this year and I tell you what, the handling and not sports car nonsense is just that. An aluminum 4.6 can take your stock 6 bolt crank but that's a bad thing to make decisions based on. Take any year 5.4, slap your heads on it and go. Many have run 12's with just the 5.4, their 4.6 intake and a decent tune. If you want to seriously discuss and figure it out then you need to go to mustangboards.com and check out the 5.4 sticky in the 4.6 section. 4K responses full of information you want. FWIW, I used a fidanza aluminum flywheel on mine and I gotta tell ya.. you'll probably be happier with steel or iron. The aluminum is so light it's a bitch to drive sometimes. Combined with my DF kevlar clutch it takes some practice to be smooth and nobody else likes my clutch but me. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,598
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I seen some numbers. As far as torque goes the 5.4 totally out does the 4.6. But if you don't upgrade the cams and intake, the design is a truck set up. You won't lose any HP just gain torque. If you get the new intake and cams, it will be a much better engine power wise than the 4.6. AS for weight, your looking at a 50 lbs difference between the iron and aluminum block. Then adding 25-50 more pounds for the 5.4 plus fitment issues. The real difference is 75-100lbs. off the front end and More space for power adders. Lower weight, better weight distribution and more room to upgrade. Id do aluminum.
__________________
Aztec Gold 97GT. MM CC Plates, Panhard Bar, SFC's & Tower Brace Eibach Sway Bars H&R Race Springs/Bilstein Shocks MAC CAI, LT's, Catted H and Pro-Dumps KB Boost-a-Spark 04' PI Motor Author of The Official Suspension Guide |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
|
Any other oppinions? Maybe others out thier have done either of these swaps?
__________________
1998 GT FRPP: 4.10s, Alluminum d/s STEEDA:upper/lowers, springs, cc plates, tri-ax TOKICO: Adjustable shocks SPEC: alluminum flywheel K&N: Intake Screamin Demon ignition ram: clutch ----------------------- BUCK OFAMA |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 302
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
why not ask the guys on mustangboards... we've hashed this out there for years already. You'll get both sides there.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 1,059
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Aluminum 4v man......
Why move to the 5.4 when the 4.6 has hit well over 1000hp. Quite a few people are running around in 600-900hp 4valves. 5.4 is great if you have such a huge turbo that the low end suffers.... but really I'd go with the lighter weight myself.... My 97 Cobra is at least under 3000lbs and its a blast to drive even with everything else stock. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
|
4valves are great, but that is is a fairly difficult and expensive swap, The options Im considering, are between an alluminum block 2v or a 5.4 2v. Thanks.
__________________
1998 GT FRPP: 4.10s, Alluminum d/s STEEDA:upper/lowers, springs, cc plates, tri-ax TOKICO: Adjustable shocks SPEC: alluminum flywheel K&N: Intake Screamin Demon ignition ram: clutch ----------------------- BUCK OFAMA |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
Personally, I'd rather lose the weight than gain the torque, but it really depends on what you want to do with the car. People talk about 25 lbs off the front end not being worth it, and I would disagree heartily; I would *love* to pull 25 lbs off the front, and 100 lbs would be even better. Of course, I'm already running an aluminum block
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ Buy my Bronco, special deal for MM folks |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 1,059
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You put the battery in the trunk yet? I also think every little bit up there matters. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 302
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
have you actually driven a 5.4 stang? You should try it before making blanket statements. It's really quite a lot more fun than people think it would be.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
97 Cobra
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Oak Michigan
Posts: 1,059
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,598
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
A 5.4 2v is a truck motor at heart. Like the late 60's and early 70s cars. They were build to make torque. Torque is great, and torque wins races, but the engine needs some re-working to make alot of horsepower. Horse power is what gets you that high trap speed, horsepower is what gets you that pull past 5000rpm, horsepower is what gives your car the get up and go when your on the highway. Torque on the other hand, is the kick in the pants off the line, the break em lose when you downshift, and the low driveability. Torque makes the car less revy and much more touchy at low speeds. Both are great, and the 5.4 has gobbs of torque. The issue is, it doesn't make great HP. And not to mention the fact that the heads limit the horsepower on a 4.6l, just think what the loss of efficiency is on an extra .8 liters.
A 5.4 will no doubt be fun, just like a manual truck. Tons of fun below 20 mph. But get going and they kind of fall flat. Ofcourse, retune it, get a new cam, get some LT's and a new intake. And it will scream like the 2000 Cobra R mustangs. But you got to do all those if you don't want to be driving the same car you got now with more torque down low. Most people who I have heard that have done it. Say that untill they get all the new intake and what not, that its really just to be different. Otherwise its not all that worth it.
__________________
Aztec Gold 97GT. MM CC Plates, Panhard Bar, SFC's & Tower Brace Eibach Sway Bars H&R Race Springs/Bilstein Shocks MAC CAI, LT's, Catted H and Pro-Dumps KB Boost-a-Spark 04' PI Motor Author of The Official Suspension Guide |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
SLOW
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 74
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
What about a DOHC 5.4? I have been lurking around the mustangboards.com for months and have seen most of r3dn3ck's posts and I have looked at his website and it seems like a good plan, but I just haven't found anything about trying to stick a 5.4 4v under a hood - it seemed to work well enough for the Cobra R - has anyone seen an attempt at this?
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||||
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 302
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If you're in Northern California, why not come out and take a ride in my truck-like car that's only fun at 20mph. BTW... my 5.4 and 3.55 gears is faster from 60-120 than my old 64 Dart GT was with a 400hp 360cid and 4.10's in back. |
||||
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 302
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Genibus Nitito Canus
|
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, muffler delete ![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: engine options?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Engine Swap... Options? | Zatrekaz | V6 Mustangs | 7 | December 17th, 2007 04:30 PM |
| Engine options. | shadowgames81 | 5.0 Mustangs | 28 | September 6th, 2007 08:50 PM |
| 67 mustang, engine options... | tenn2200 | Racer's Corner | 18 | August 19th, 2007 08:52 PM |
| 1970 engine options, 460? | scottschall | Classic Mustangs | 4 | February 3rd, 2007 09:32 AM |