| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2003 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
need some input
I currently own an 03 automatic GT with 99k miles.
I'm relatively new to modding cars but my goal is to have a reliable street car that i'd also be able to take to the track. I'd imagine i want to be pushing around 450hp, and i'd want to know my motor could handle it safely, so would it be worth investing a ton of money into building a motor for a 2v, getting heads ported, supercharger, cams, all that.. or would it be a better idea to sell my car and wait for a 03-04 cobra to come along? How much horsepower can you make from a 2v? |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
The Doctor
'01 Cobra Vert.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Posts: 27,386
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
Well it depends...do you want to have the fun of building your own 2V? Or would you rather just hold off for the Cobra? That's all up to you my friend
__________________
![]() ![]() 2008 Acura TL Type-S (the daily) 2006 Yamaha R6 50th Anniversary Edition (the other toy) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Enthusiast
2008 Cadillac CTS4
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver,BC
Posts: 720
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
well most people will say it will be easier to just buy the cobra and go from there casue it will make good power will a pulley swap and a tune. but on the flip side look at jive(another member) he has a sick GT pushing over 600 to the wheels. so its up to you. our GT have potential if you have patience and money. Plus its always a surprise to see a fast ass GT. people suspect a cobra to be fast, but when a GT pulls up and kicks your ass its a nice surprise
__________________
2003 Mustang GT See Garage for mod list....360RWHP,360RWTQ....SOLD 2008 Cadillac CTS4 |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
2010 mustang gt auto
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: creighton pa
Posts: 7,470
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
450 hp is a very lofty goal for someone who is both new to modding & wanting a reliable d/d. my advice would be to do gears, a converter, tune, exhaust, & some minor bolt ons & I bet you'll be pretty happy (for alot less money & have a much more reliable car). but if you insist on that much power you'll want to do a motor if you want to both race it & have it be reliable.
__________________
MM BRACKET RACING CREW CO-FOUNDER BAMA Performance Drag Team Founder 2010 GT auto
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Super Stang
never quick enuff
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 215
![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
You can reach the 430-470 power range with a blower and a set of cams as long as you have a enuff fuel and a good tune.
Don't overlook the trans and a torque converter as it will make a night & day differance when stepping up H.P. You don't wanna burn out a high mileage stock tranny with the added mods. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
2003 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
I was planning on a shift kit, and one of my buddies told me something about getting the pressure increased in the lines for faster, firmer shifts? Would there be anything else i'd need for a stock tranny to keep it from breaking with that amount of hp?
What's the recommended stall? is 2700 good? |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
2003 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Moderator
2010 mustang gt auto
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: creighton pa
Posts: 7,470
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
__________________
MM BRACKET RACING CREW CO-FOUNDER BAMA Performance Drag Team Founder 2010 GT auto
Last edited by casper gt; May 2nd, 2009 at 02:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,970
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
This should help...
Yep! Stock from the top to the bottom, minus shifter. Stock clutch, flywheel, and all that as well. I never had any clutch slip, or anything... Launched the car at 6200RPM drag racing on DOT slicks, no problems ever. ![]() 100% stock longblock. It was running 13psi - and was running out of fuel (needed a larger pump than single focus pump). The stock block I believe, is capable of 700 bro so if you want more than that go for the cobra but as you can see with the money spent on the cobra the gt will be faster.. Last edited by 2002 BLK GT; May 2nd, 2009 at 05:28 AM. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 4,733
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
450 hp (crank) shouldn't be a problem. For guys with manual transmissions that's around 380-390 rwhp. This is considered fairly safe for a daily driver. Because of the higher parasitic loss through an automatic transmission you would only see around 360 rwhp.
What do you need? An intercooled supercharger at 10 psi, a 75mm TB/Plenum and an off-road mid-pipe should get you pretty close. Edit: The stock block is capable of 1000 hp. The stock rods and pistons are not.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. Last edited by Eagle2000GT; May 2nd, 2009 at 06:54 PM. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
I thought the cobra block was only capable of that...?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
The GT's have cast iron blocks the same as 03-04 Cobras do only difference is the heads and internals... etc...
__________________
![]() 2004 GT Boosted by Vortech |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
I see now..
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
02 mineral grey GT
SORC 29 miles 13 mins 14 secs
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 411
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
GT Mustang..........10k
Supercharger...........5k the ear to ear smile accross a the face of whoever is in the passenger seat.............priceless oh and did I mention the other 10k thats still in your bank because you didnt buy a snake
__________________
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
2003 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 57
![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
whats the hp limit for the stock internals?
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
450 rwhp is borderlining the limit of the rods so you might as well swap everything out for forged internals if you want to stay at that power range or above... and seeing as you have 99k miles already on the clock who knows how much more stress the stock internals you have can take.
__________________
![]() 2004 GT Boosted by Vortech |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 4,733
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I've seen several posts where motors came apart after a few weeks at 420 rwhp and I've read posts where they've lasted a couple of years at that power. The difference is in the other supporting mods such as cams, heads, etc. Some have even pushed the stock internals further but they had all of the supporting mod available.
I believe that all of them were manual transmissions. You have to remember for an automatic that it takes a lot more horsepower at the crank than for a manual transmission to make the same horsepower at the wheels and if you use rwhp as a measuring stick you will be pushing your motor a lot farther than they did. The same horsepower at the block results in 30-35 less horsepower at the wheels for an automatic. If you want to go much beyond 360-380 rwhp you should probably rebuild the motor with forged rods and pistons. 450 rwhp takes a lot more money than 450 hp. 600 rwhp is possible in a 2v. It just takes money. P.S. Just because automatics put down less at the wheels doesn't necessarily make them slower. With a shift kit automatics are just as fast and they never miss a shift.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. Last edited by Eagle2000GT; May 3rd, 2009 at 08:49 AM. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Enthusiast
|
so you would be good sticking right around 400rwhp and not have to change much? wich would be what.. 455hp
__________________
![]() 2000 Mustang GT 2009 Kawasaki Ninja 250R (For Sale) 2002 Yamaha yzf R6 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: need some input
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I need your input! | 02MustangV6e9 | Reviews | 8 | January 11th, 2010 11:47 PM |
| Need some input | Megawatts88 | Visual | 3 | March 13th, 2009 01:30 AM |
| I need your input! | 02MustangV6e9 | 94-95 | 77 | September 8th, 2008 03:40 PM |
| Looking for some input. | chris1 | The Clubhouse | 36 | June 9th, 2008 07:09 PM |
| i need some input | Nick_Rapitis | Classic Mustangs | 63 | October 29th, 2007 04:14 AM |