Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 99-04

Discussing Which superchargers are the best? in the 99-04 Forum. I realize that this is probably a little while down the road but what are ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 26th, 2007, 09:23 AM   #1
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 201
Default

Which superchargers are the best?


I realize that this is probably a little while down the road but what are the best performing superchargers. It always seems like when you watch videos of nasty mustangs they always have either a KB or a whipple. Are these the two best that are made?
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 11:07 AM   #2
MM Ninjas!
 
drgnracin72's Avatar
 
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,910
Default

WHAT ARE YOUR PLANS FOR THE CAR?
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL09 View Post
if i had a cobra R, i'd take out the vents and put little miniature fish tanks in their places and fill them with sea monkeys
McCain/Palin 08
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 11:30 AM   #3
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 869
Default

Centrifugal= Max boost at redline, More top end power, less low end torque
Twin Screw= Lower max boost rpm, More low end toque, less top end power
Roots Type= low max boost rpm, more low end torque, less top end power( and low thermal efficiency, which means they produce a lot of heat)

There is no "BEST" supercharger. It depends on your preference. Depends on how your engine is setup, and where you want your powerband to be.

Best supercharger ever made= doesn't exist..
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 01:16 PM   #4
Regular
 
Ryno's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 121
Default

The Kenne Bells just look awsome under the hood though... I was savin up some $ to get a supercharger and was wondering if any of them allowed me to keep my K&N CAI? I was considering a centrifugal one because they seem to be cheaper, but every one that i have seen has its own air filter... I always thought the KB's were the best (you can get them with everything u need to install it including injectors and a chip all in the same package)
__________________
Ryno
www.myspace.com/ryno5700
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 08:14 PM   #5
Regular
 
M.O.B.Fab's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by StangAddiction
Centrifugal= Max boost at redline, More top end power, less low end torque
Twin Screw= Lower max boost rpm, More low end toque, less top end power
Roots Type= low max boost rpm, more low end torque, less top end power( and low thermal efficiency, which means they produce a lot of heat).
you say a centrifical makes its power at high RPMs...so would a twin screw or roots be easier on your motor? since you dont have to wind it out as much to get the power?...

im about to order my supercharger...itll be goin on a 01 cobra with all boltons...but will be a daily driver that goes to the track maybe once or twice a month....would a twin screw be safer for a DD?

sorry to hijack, just had some quick questions....
James
__________________
M.O.B. Fabrication
Huntsville/Cullman, AL
256-297-6015
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 09:12 PM   #6
MM Ninjas!
 
drgnracin72's Avatar
 
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,910
Default

i think the roots are harder on the car becasue the instant huge torque
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL09 View Post
if i had a cobra R, i'd take out the vents and put little miniature fish tanks in their places and fill them with sea monkeys
McCain/Palin 08
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 09:18 PM   #7
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 869
Default

Originally Posted by M.O.B.Fab
Originally Posted by StangAddiction
Centrifugal= Max boost at redline, More top end power, less low end torque
Twin Screw= Lower max boost rpm, More low end toque, less top end power
Roots Type= low max boost rpm, more low end torque, less top end power( and low thermal efficiency, which means they produce a lot of heat).
you say a centrifical makes its power at high RPMs...so would a twin screw or roots be easier on your motor? since you dont have to wind it out as much to get the power?...

im about to order my supercharger...itll be goin on a 01 cobra with all boltons...but will be a daily driver that goes to the track maybe once or twice a month....would a twin screw be safer for a DD?

sorry to hijack, just had some quick questions....
James
If you want more streetability get a twin screw (kenne bell). If you'd prefer your care to be a track performer get a centrifugal (vortech, paxton, procharger, etc..). I really dont reccomend roots-type for anything. Why? Becuase they produce a lot of heat, they put more parasitic drag on the engine, they're harder on the internals, and companies that make them are few and far between (which should indicate something right there). Ford put a roots-type on the cobra becuase they're cheaper to build than the twin screw, and centrifugal systems dont produce the ideal torque and power curves of a street car.
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 09:24 PM   #8
MM Fanatic
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,041
Default

as far as the safety of the motor, all of them are the same. as long as the car is tuned for the s/c there will be minimal damage from one to another. the roots, screw is better on bottom but more heat. the screw types are the most efficient when compared to the roots. whipple and KB are the most popular in this category. centrifugals are best for top end performance when the rpm's will stay high. my personal preference is the procharger for that app. they have the coolest output air temps, isnt as harsh on the air, due to the impeller design.
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze
1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69



Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.

One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 10:21 PM   #9
Regular
 
M.O.B.Fab's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by SWEET2KSTANG
as far as the safety of the motor, all of them are the same. as long as the car is tuned for the s/c there will be minimal damage from one to another. the roots, screw is better on bottom but more heat. the screw types are the most efficient when compared to the roots. whipple and KB are the most popular in this category. centrifugals are best for top end performance when the rpm's will stay high. my personal preference is the procharger for that app. they have the coolest output air temps, isnt as harsh on the air, due to the impeller design.
yea, ive had my heart set on procharger, but i just dont wanna cause any harm to my car over time...i'll probly run this one 4 years or so before it becomes an actual track only car....and im kindda new to F/I...thanks for the info yall!
__________________
M.O.B. Fabrication
Huntsville/Cullman, AL
256-297-6015
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 10:30 PM   #10
Regular
 
M.O.B.Fab's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 114
Default

oh yea, sorry...but does anyone know a ballpark price on the KenneBell 2.1l 9psi Intercooled kit?.....ill call them on monday probly, but just seein if anyone knew about how much....

damn, i really need to quit hijackin thread....sorry 01silversnake!
__________________
M.O.B. Fabrication
Huntsville/Cullman, AL
256-297-6015
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 10:33 PM   #11
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
sonicblue's Avatar
 
1990 GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
Default

i believe 5000. and 5500 for the 2.6.
__________________
1990 5.0
getting all fixed up for next season
2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
 
Old January 26th, 2007, 10:51 PM   #12
MM Fanatic
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,041
Default

all kits that are made specific for the mustang is made for a stock set up without comprimising drivability or premature wear unless otherwise specified. there are competition kits that require other mods (ex. forged bottom end) but all kits will state information on all apps. i know guys that are running boost and some that are spraying without any problems with drivability problems. they all been running it for a long while now.
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze
1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69



Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.

One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 12:28 AM   #13
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
neckbonekat's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 6,017
Default

Here is the full KB price list. A '99 Cobra, intercooled with 9 psi your looking at $6799.
http://www.kennebell.net/pricelist/SC-PRICELIST.pdf
__________________
2001 BULLITT GT

I DON'T CARE WHERE THE CAR IS MADE. IF YOU CAN'T BEAT IT DON'T TALK SH*T!
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 01:33 AM   #14
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
03 Mustang GT Twin Turbo
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southaven,MS
Posts: 1,467
Default

Originally Posted by neckbonekat
Here is the full KB price list. A '99 Cobra, intercooled with 9 psi your looking at $6799.

dude for that price,maaaaaybe a little more you could get a twin turbo kit and put down probably,just a guess, 100-150 more hp than a KB
__________________
Nobody gonna take my car
Im gonna race it to the ground
Nobody gonna beat my car
Its gonna break the speed of sound
Oooh its a killing machine
Its got everything
Like a driving power big fat tires
And everything - Deep Purple
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 10:16 AM   #15
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 991
Default

You basically would have been better off asking what came first. The chicken or the ... egg?

Anyway.

Procharger.
__________________
http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q...rGT/shiela.jpg
Originally Posted by texas_mustang
MSTGGT00 wrote:
If my kids try and drive hondas. Ill send them to mexico in a basket.
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 01:16 PM   #16
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
neckbonekat's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 6,017
Default

9 PSI INTERCOOLED
KENNE BELL 2.1L 8-12 psi 6 Rib System
KENNE BELL 2.1L 13-21 psi 8 Rib System
Same power potential as the '03-'04 Cobra with the Kenne Bell kit. 9 psi about max on pump gas with stock rods & pistons. This kit will produce 462HP at 9 psi and 449HP at 7.5 psi.Kit includes necessary fuel system and inlet upgrades (Kenne Bell Cool Air Kit, BOOST-A-PUMP™, 90mm Meter, SWITCH CHIP®, 42lb Injectors and Cobra Inlet Tube). Max boost for the 2.1L is 18 psi, but Cobra/Manley low compression pistons and rods are necessary for boost above 9 psi. '03 Cobra intercooler, heat exchanger, fill tank pump, hoses, fittings, adaptors and all hardware is included.

These are comparisons between our stock '03 Cobra/Eaton vs. the stock '99-'01 test cars. Both were 11.1 AF ratio and 23° and 18° timing respectively. Even without an intercooler, the Kenne Bell 5 psi kit (5.5 psi peak) outpowers the '03 Cobra with 8.5 psi peak boost. The Kenne Bell 9 psi kit produces up to 96 more HP than the '03 Cobra.
http://www.kennebell.net/supercharge...ra_99-014v.htm
__________________
2001 BULLITT GT

I DON'T CARE WHERE THE CAR IS MADE. IF YOU CAN'T BEAT IT DON'T TALK SH*T!
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 07:18 PM   #17
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1999 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,309
Default

VORTECH / KB !!!
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 08:06 PM   #18
MM Ninjas!
 
drgnracin72's Avatar
 
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,910
Default

twin turbo
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL09 View Post
if i had a cobra R, i'd take out the vents and put little miniature fish tanks in their places and fill them with sea monkeys
McCain/Palin 08
 
Old January 27th, 2007, 11:23 PM   #19
Regular
 
M.O.B.Fab's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 114
Default

thanks for the info...that KB kit is cheaper than i thought...i figured itd be like 7500....6800 isnt that bad...
__________________
M.O.B. Fabrication
Huntsville/Cullman, AL
256-297-6015
 
Old January 28th, 2007, 02:58 AM   #20
MM Ninjas!
 
drgnracin72's Avatar
 
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,910
Default

MOB, for that price you could have hp twin 57mm turbos . maybe for about $500 more. and the power youll get out of those will be much more effieicent than the kb and make a lot more power
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL09 View Post
if i had a cobra R, i'd take out the vents and put little miniature fish tanks in their places and fill them with sea monkeys
McCain/Palin 08
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Which superchargers are the best?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superchargers scxc15 Poweradders 11 November 12th, 2007 11:27 AM
Superchargers boyblue V6 Mustangs 11 July 29th, 2007 06:07 PM
Necessary for superchargers? xedubx 99-04 11 May 31st, 2007 09:37 PM
Superchargers, which are better? energiesource 99-04 21 April 25th, 2007 03:41 PM
superchargers 00GT Modular Mustangs 6 April 23rd, 2007 07:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.