tork tech

SilverGT04 · August 14th, 2009, 01:59 PM

okay is it worth doing the conversion to slap an eaton on my car with the new torch tech adapter... i have full drag suspension i jsut want to get into the 11's but i dont want nitrous. any opinions apprciated

GTRACER88 · August 14th, 2009, 02:21 PM

Centrifical is cheaper. Ajm got his for under 2k. Or around that price.

gray8188 · August 14th, 2009, 03:21 PM

Go centri the eatons are very unefficient and for the money you could get allot more power.. The only thing i really like about them is it would be really interesting to have a nice sized whipple on a built 2v..

ronster · August 14th, 2009, 03:45 PM

The M112 Eaton based Tork Tech kit, is producing remarkable power. At 9 pounds they are at about 415-420. (in my opinion, pushing your luck), and at 19 pounds of boost on a built 2V with Fox Lake heads and cams, they hit 591 rwhp.

If you want to go beyond that point, swap in a TVS 1900 which bolts on the kit. 735 rwhp...

gray8188 · August 14th, 2009, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by ronster

The M112 Eaton based Tork Tech kit, is producing remarkable power. At 9 pounds they are at about 415-420. (in my opinion, pushing your luck), and at 19 pounds of boost on a built 2V with Fox Lake heads and cams, they hit 591 rwhp.

If you want to go beyond that point, swap in a TVS 1900 which bolts on the kit. 735 rwhp...

I would never push a heaton to 19 pounds whats the point all its gonna do is heat up.. And im not going against you but i dont see the eaton outpowering a twin screw at the same amount of boost..

MustangGT06 · August 14th, 2009, 06:11 PM

I have looked into this and found out that an M112 is not worth spending that much money on. Just buy a Kenne Bell meant for your stang.

gray8188 · August 14th, 2009, 06:51 PM

Originally Posted by MustangGT06

I have looked into this and found out that an M112 is not worth spending that much money on. Just buy a Kenne Bell meant for your stang.

The eaton isnt but if i had a built motor i would love to pick up a 3.4l whipple

man_of_war2081 · August 15th, 2009, 07:53 PM

Imagine the tork tech kit on a built 2V, new TFS heads with either a 3.4 whipple or 2.8 kennebell mammoth kit

99spaded · August 15th, 2009, 08:40 PM

Originally Posted by man_of_war2081

Imagine the tork tech kit on a built 2V, new TFS heads with either a 3.4 whipple or 2.8 kennebell mammoth kit

Will the 2.8 kb kit fit on our 2v motors??..

gray8188 · August 15th, 2009, 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by 99spaded

Will the 2.8 kb kit fit on our 2v motors??..

With the tork tech manifold it is to my understanding we can use any supercharger they can use..

man_of_war2081 · August 15th, 2009, 10:43 PM

Originally Posted by gray8188

With the tork tech manifold it is to my understanding we can use any supercharger they can use..

Thats why I like the idea of the Tork Tech kit so much

gray8188 · August 15th, 2009, 11:24 PM

Originally Posted by man_of_war2081

Thats why I like the idea of the Tork Tech kit so much

Yep its cool.. But honestly for that amount i could do a 4v swap and have a much better base..

ronster · November 4th, 2009, 03:50 PM

Originally Posted by gray8188

I would never push a heaton to 19 pounds whats the point all its gonna do is heat up.. And im not going against you but i dont see the eaton outpowering a twin screw at the same amount of boost..

Have you ever been at an open track event to look at what a KB does as far as heat? You can't touch it. Besides, Tork Tech was pretty shrewd. The "aftercooler" under the S/C is a dual flow, and the front mount I/C is HUGE and works really well. The old "heaton" legacy may have been true at one time, but not from what I have seen. I think TTI was very aware of the problem.
The other thing to look at, is the intake plenum. On a KB it is flat as a pancake, and really restricts the air, on the TTI, the plenum is HUGE, so it moves a ton of air, cooling it even more.

ronster · November 18th, 2009, 11:42 PM

Some results with the TTI kit using the M112 at 18 pounds. 3600 pound car including driver.

YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.

Scott2001GT · November 18th, 2009, 11:46 PM

not a fan of the eaton here. I say a 2.6L Kenne Bell or a Centri.

ronster · November 19th, 2009, 12:13 AM

OK. Freedom of choice. One more caviat. Lets say you sell the car or drop in a 5.4L. For about $100.00 bucks you buy a set of 5.4L adapter rails, and the entire kit drops onto a 5.4L no need to spend another 6-7 grand to put a S/C on the new rig.

TwirtleNutZ270 · November 19th, 2009, 12:15 AM

but why swap to a 5.4?

AndrewA. · November 19th, 2009, 04:42 AM

And dont you have to get a cowl hood with that sense the S/C is raised up more? Add the cost of hood/paint.

MU71L4710N · November 19th, 2009, 05:02 AM

or cut a hole in your hood and use their extended hood scoop to cover the hole. 200$ for hood scoop

LAWNDART02 · November 19th, 2009, 07:29 AM

Still gotta paint the thing, and cutting the hole and sealing it correctly, without jacking up the final appearance and finish is something to think about.

If you have accesss to a Magn. MP112 for a good price, that might be the way to go. If it's all from scratch, I say go with the KB.

BTW, I know people are split on this topic, but: The Magn. MP112 will be louder than the stock cobra eaton. It has less restriction on the exit port. This allows better power, but it will scream like a Biatch. Might be harsh for a DD, then again like I said, some people LOVE the whine and can't get enough, others don't.

The Stock SC was restrictive to somewhat control the noise, but aftermarket SC's all bets are off in the name of power...

August 14th, 2009, 01:59 PM	#1
SilverGT04 Enthusiast Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 575 iTrader: 0 reviews	tork tech okay is it worth doing the conversion to slap an eaton on my car with the new torch tech adapter... i have full drag suspension i jsut want to get into the 11's but i dont want nitrous. any opinions apprciated __________________

August 14th, 2009, 02:21 PM	#2
GTRACER88 I'm cool.. Join Date: May 2008 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 2,165 iTrader: 1 reviews	Centrifical is cheaper. Ajm got his for under 2k. Or around that price. __________________ Super Slow 2012 Grabber blue 5.0...

August 14th, 2009, 03:21 PM	#3
gray8188 MM Fanatic 2003 mustang gt yr 1965 @ 88mph Join Date: May 2008 Location: between bluefilly's legs. Posts: 3,425 iTrader: 5 reviews	Go centri the eatons are very unefficient and for the money you could get allot more power.. The only thing i really like about them is it would be really interesting to have a nice sized whipple on a built 2v.. __________________ i'm pretty sure that when i move into my own place i'm gonna mount an anti aircraft gun on my roof with somebody manning it 24 hours a day. why? because it would be fucking AWESOME.[/quote]

August 15th, 2009, 07:53 PM	#8
man_of_war2081 Regular Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Charlotte NC Posts: 444 iTrader: 0 reviews	Imagine the tork tech kit on a built 2V, new TFS heads with either a 3.4 whipple or 2.8 kennebell mammoth kit __________________ 02 Mustang GT Stock

November 18th, 2009, 11:46 PM	#15
Scott2001GT BYAHHHH! 2001 Mustang GT 13.874 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Missouri Posts: 14,793 Blog Entries: 1 iTrader: 3 reviews	not a fan of the eaton here. I say a 2.6L Kenne Bell or a Centri. __________________ Precision Turbo\|TurboSmart\|TeamZ\|Strange\|Hellion\|BBK\|SCT\|Edge Converters\|Fairbanks\|CG Fabrications\|Treadstone

August 14th, 2009, 03:45 PM	#4
ronster Regular Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver, WA Posts: 107 iTrader: 0 reviews	The M112 Eaton based Tork Tech kit, is producing remarkable power. At 9 pounds they are at about 415-420. (in my opinion, pushing your luck), and at 19 pounds of boost on a built 2V with Fox Lake heads and cams, they hit 591 rwhp. If you want to go beyond that point, swap in a TVS 1900 which bolts on the kit. 735 rwhp...

August 14th, 2009, 06:11 PM	#6
MustangGT06 Enthusiast Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 567 iTrader: 0 reviews	I have looked into this and found out that an M112 is not worth spending that much money on. Just buy a Kenne Bell meant for your stang.

November 19th, 2009, 12:13 AM	#16
ronster Regular Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver, WA Posts: 107 iTrader: 0 reviews	OK. Freedom of choice. One more caviat. Lets say you sell the car or drop in a 5.4L. For about $100.00 bucks you buy a set of 5.4L adapter rails, and the entire kit drops onto a 5.4L no need to spend another 6-7 grand to put a S/C on the new rig.

November 19th, 2009, 12:15 AM	#17
TwirtleNutZ270 Regular 2003 Mach 1 12.12@112.69 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: STL Posts: 104 iTrader: 0 reviews	but why swap to a 5.4? __________________ Fuck It

November 19th, 2009, 04:42 AM	#18
AndrewA. Hardcore Enthusiast 2001 Mustang GT 8.9@78 Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: DFW Texas Posts: 1,925 iTrader: 2 reviews	And dont you have to get a cowl hood with that sense the S/C is raised up more? Add the cost of hood/paint. __________________ Fire it up, burn it down.

November 19th, 2009, 05:02 AM	#19
MU71L4710N Newbie Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 47 iTrader: 0 reviews	or cut a hole in your hood and use their extended hood scoop to cover the hole. 200$ for hood scoop

November 19th, 2009, 07:29 AM	#20
LAWNDART02 Regular 02 GT Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Detroit Posts: 333 iTrader: 0 reviews	Still gotta paint the thing, and cutting the hole and sealing it correctly, without jacking up the final appearance and finish is something to think about. If you have accesss to a Magn. MP112 for a good price, that might be the way to go. If it's all from scratch, I say go with the KB. BTW, I know people are split on this topic, but: The Magn. MP112 will be louder than the stock cobra eaton. It has less restriction on the exit port. This allows better power, but it will scream like a Biatch. Might be harsh for a DD, then again like I said, some people LOVE the whine and can't get enough, others don't. The Stock SC was restrictive to somewhat control the noise, but aftermarket SC's all bets are off in the name of power... __________________ 02 2v 5sp- 9lb KB 2.1L I/C, 90MAF, 75mmStack TB, FLSFC's, Magnaflow C/B, NT555R's, MGW shift, Black Sabbath

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

Threads Similar to: tork tech
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Tork Tech supercharger kit?	pber13	99-04	27	November 24th, 2009 01:17 PM
? on the tork tech manifold..	gray8188	99-04	17	April 15th, 2009 04:40 PM
Tork Tech build-up	wishIhada5.0	99-04	41	December 29th, 2008 03:21 PM
Tork Tech?	Hawaiianbro	99-04	3	September 22nd, 2008 01:37 AM
Tork Tech?	Cricket	99-04	5	July 5th, 2008 02:59 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.