| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
__________________
![]() 2000 Mustang GT 2002 Yamaha YZF R6 |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
Regular
1999 Mustang gt
13.5@102MPH
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 319
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
lol dont think itll be like that my bros srt-4 is retarded fast with the stock turbo. only way i beat him with my old gt was from a dig lol. and i know they are but im gonna take a different route with this and make it top end too.
__________________
2003 True blue Mustang GT steeda triax , h&r springs , bbk intake , c&l plenum ,frpp tb ,SCT tuned , 4.10's or x-pipe,mac CB , max motorsports sfc, 125 shot ,315 drag radials nt05r's 13.4@104 n/a RIP:1999 Mustang GT Auto 13.5 @102 |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
2000
10.67
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 135
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
4.10s over 3.73 for sure
as said above 4.10s with give a higher top speed and if your only worried about highway top speed blasts then still go with 4.10 cause 5th gear will be useable unlike with the 3.27s and better then the 3.73s as for the 1/4. I was trapping 109 n/a with 4.10s and a 26in tire. With the blower I was trapping 123@6600 with the 4.10s and 26in tire and now trap near 129@6600 with 28in tires and 4.10s. Oh and the motor n heads are stock right down to the valve springs only cams have been added
__________________
2000 GT 60' 1.42 1/4 10.49 mph 129.8 |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,803
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
It takes 188 rwHP or so to sustain a new-edge GT coupe to 145 MPH (see my "How much HP to go how fast?" calculator). With 3.27s, in 5th gear, the engine will be spinning 4k RPM or so (see my "How fast can I go in each gear?" calculator), probably 1.0k to 1.2k RPM below its peak output, and probably at just about 188HP output for a stock GT in reasonable tune and condition. It takes 227 rwHP to sustain 155 MPH, with 3.73s the engine will be running at 4.85k RPM, much closer to the HP peak and much more like to be able to actually deliver 227 HP. Sustaining 160 MPH requires 248 rwHP, and with 4.10s the engine would be spinning at 5.5k, probably a bit past peak HP but still "up there". This is why, in our cars that have HP not "gear" limited top speeds, lower (numerically higher) rear-axle gears will actually increase top-speed. Selecting gears so as to match peak HP delivery and trap speed is a whole other issue. ----------------------------------- BTW, with a stock 3650 tranny, and 4.10s, and assuming you had the HP to do it, top-speed at 6500 RPM would be 190 MPH...
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang 2003 GT, UPR X, 24lb/h injectors, Magnaflow, 180° stat, PP 70mm TB & plenum, DF Commando, Steeda UDPs, Ralco RZ_flywheel, RAM HDX clutch, WX EFX COPs 3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 lb-ft. Flex-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: MPH?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| at 60 MPH?! | Cesar2cool | 99-04 | 5 | February 8th, 2008 08:56 AM |
| mph | jwe | 99-04 | 22 | February 3rd, 2008 02:47 PM |
| Into a field at 70 mph | MattKG85 | General Tech | 6 | January 26th, 2008 08:32 PM |
| 02 GT at 11.47 and 120 mph | Bill | Videos | 7 | November 18th, 2007 12:18 PM |
| vibes at 50-60 mph? | dave07GT | 2005 - 2010 | 4 | September 25th, 2007 04:59 PM |