| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing D1 vs. P1 Procharger Head Units in the 99-04 Forum. I have a D1SC in my car right now and am about to pulley down. ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 1,007
|
D1 vs. P1 Procharger Head Units
I have a D1SC in my car right now and am about to pulley down. I know that a D1 head unit with a 3.4" pulley will make more boost, ceteris paribus, than a P1 head unit with a 3.4" pulley.
My question (and it might be a stupid one), does a D1 head unit make more power than a P1 head unit at the same boost levels? Anyone venture to guess what my boost and hp/torque numbers will be if I run a 3.4" pulley on my D1SC on a basically stock engine? I have: D1SC head unit Procharger Red Race Valve Procharger 3 core IC 42# Lucas Injectors GT Fuel Pump BBK O/R X Pipe Bob thinks I'll be running 14-15 lbs of boost, which I think is about right
__________________
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Boost gets you laid
2001 Mustang GT
12.93@113.7 (on the 18's)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Milton, WA
Posts: 2,169
|
yup, the D1 usually makes slightly more power at the same boost level due to its different impeller design that flows more volume. i'll wait for others to chime in on this.. its worth a shot putting it on and thowing her on a dyno.. i'd do a pull to about 10 psi (regardless of RPM) and let off, see where that puts you powerwise.. then do a pull to 12, then redline (or what rpm you think your cutoff point will be) and see what she does.. with that 3 core and a good tune you should be ok if your engine is in good shape and you are running nice and rich 11:3-11.6 a/f ratio! i can see it putting down at least 450 with that pulley.. which could be safe as long as your IAT is cool and your AF ratio is good!
__________________
![]() '01 GT. P1SC. MMR 900. CMS 2.5 Blower cams. #'s coming soon 2003 Rubicon (DD) 05 Suzuki SV650S 55mpg SOLD Boosted GT Club Founder www.myspace.com/jeepwheelerbob |
|
|
#3 |
|
Boost gets you laid
2001 Mustang GT
12.93@113.7 (on the 18's)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Milton, WA
Posts: 2,169
|
its your call on how hard you want to push it, but the centri is the safest poweradder on these motors especially when you have that nice big $1100 intercooler on there
__________________
![]() '01 GT. P1SC. MMR 900. CMS 2.5 Blower cams. #'s coming soon 2003 Rubicon (DD) 05 Suzuki SV650S 55mpg SOLD Boosted GT Club Founder www.myspace.com/jeepwheelerbob |
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
11.01@128.32
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seale, Alabama
Posts: 1,191
|
the D1 will make about 20 to 30 more hp due too its compressor design..
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
Like a Boss...
2006 Mustang GT
In the 13's
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: I'm so badass I make medicine cry
Posts: 12,549
|
I would start doing stuff like longtubes, or cams to let the motor breathe better, and knock the boost down some while still making power.
__________________
![]() Liberals are like cheese, they are full of holes, and stink. They lack the moral fiber to function as most of us do. When the world turns to chaos because of their actions, we will simply know them as food for the rest of us. JAKE'S PIITB CREW MEMBER#4
|
||||
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
11.01@128.32
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seale, Alabama
Posts: 1,191
|
^^^ what he said! id do some exhaust work first then start with stuff like the plenum and tb. the boost will drop and youll make same power or maybe even more power with more reliability!
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 1,007
|
If I can find a friggen tuner anywhere within 6 hours of me that knows what they are doing with a Mustang, then I would love a dyno tune!! I plan on running it on the rich side and I'm hoping the IC keeps the IAT down. How rich is too rich though? I've heard that if you run too rich that it can wash down the oil on the cylinder walls (IIRC that's what it does, maybe I'm way off) So a car w/ 450 hp at 12# is more reliable than a car at 425 at 14# of boost? Is that just because of the decreased stress on the internals with lower boost levels?
__________________
Last edited by dcook_14 : November 3rd, 2009 at 12:34 AM. |
|||
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,087
|
Every car responds a little differently. But, if I remember correctly, a D-1SC makes 5-6 lbs more boost with the same pulley as the P-1SC. I'm currently running a 3.7" pulley and making 8.9 lbs on my P-1SC. ProCharger said that for each 1/10" you go down you gain around 1 psi. Going to a 3.4" pulley would put my P-1SC around 12 lbs. I don't know but a 3.4" pulley on a D-1SC might be a bit much for the stock internals?
I have also been told that to safely run 425 rwhp you should have additional mods to help relieve the stress off of the rods and pistons. That you shouldn't try to get there just by upping the boost on a supercharger. The better the flow through the engine, the less stress on the rods and pistons. Long-tubes with o/r pipe and cams are a couple of mods that help the engine hold up to the stress. There are motors that have run at 425+ for a couple of years. There are others that hold up only a few months. Most people suggest that the tune is the problem but it's just as likely that those that don't hold up are those that do not have other supporting mods.
__________________
latest tune: 370 rwhp/377 rwtq Garage: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-11329/ Previously Owned: 1966 Coronet 500, 426 ci est. 290-300 rwhp 1969 Camaro RS/SS, 350 ci est. 210-220 rwhp Today is the real muscle car era. |
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 1,007
|
So I might have just spent a bunch of money on a pulley I cant use... Sweet
I'm only running 6# of boost with a 4" pulley and I know the .1"=1# of boost thing so I figured I'd be running about 12# with a 3.4" pulley... IDK
__________________
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,087
|
Even if you are only at 14-15 lbs of boost. That's quite a bit of power to be throwing at stock internals. One other thing, if you plan of pushing your motor to the absolute limit you've got to get a good dyno tune.
I read a post the other day from a guy who said he blew up his motor when the tempature got colder. He said he had a summer tune and the cold air made a difference. I don't know about you, but I have no intention of pushing my motor that far.
__________________
latest tune: 370 rwhp/377 rwtq Garage: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-11329/ Previously Owned: 1966 Coronet 500, 426 ci est. 290-300 rwhp 1969 Camaro RS/SS, 350 ci est. 210-220 rwhp Today is the real muscle car era. |
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
11.01@128.32
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seale, Alabama
Posts: 1,191
|
yes 450 on 12# is way safer than 450 on 14#..
you want ur motor to be able too breathe as in let some of that boost flow out rather tan keep it all "back pressure'd" in.. summer tunes dont go well with winter tunes due too the humidity in the summer affecting most tunes.. so ur car in the winter will run differently than it did causing (sometimes) blow motors |
|
|
#12 |
|
MM Fanatic
2001 Mustang GT
13.874
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,385
|
so u need a cooler weather tune?
__________________
Silver Vehicle Club Member #7 SLP LM1 w/ O/R Mac Prochamber Ford Racing 4:10s SCT X3 Tuner JLT cai Black FR500's 18x10 & 18x9 wrapped it Nitto 555's! and some visual Fuck ya it's a 4R70W |
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
11.01@128.32
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seale, Alabama
Posts: 1,191
|
yes..
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Regular
2000
10.67
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 135
|
boost doesnt kill motors....boost is nothing more then a measurement of back pressure in the intake track and thats it it has nothing to do with flow or amount of air.... for example.... you take said car that is making 450 with 14lbs of boost... add ported heads,cams longtubes and intake manifold now said boost read 8 but power is 550.... is that 550 safer then say a car making 550 with 15lbs nope... its not the whopping 15psi worth of pressure that kills the motor, cause it takes the same force on the piston to make 450 n/a as it does to make 450 with 1psi or 1000psi of boost its still the same force on the piston n rod another example in your way of thinking with cams n longtubes and such will lower the boost how does it lower the boost... it lowers the boost number by getting rid of restriction but it still the same amout of air if not more air getting into the chamber... thats why the boost number goes down and power goes up.. in no way will it bleed off pressure to make it safer...well unless you are running to big of N/A cams with a blower but then its not safer cause now you risk burning up the exhaust valves ... I know its something someone told you on the internet but it is just interweb BS
__________________
2000 GT 60' 1.42 1/4 10.49 mph 129.8 Last edited by BLOWN2V : November 3rd, 2009 at 05:15 PM. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
2000
10.67
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 135
|
no.... if tuned correctly the computer will adjust the timing and fuel based off the MAF and IAT.... but what you do need to watch is some parts of the country use a winter blend of fuel and if you are in one of those areas then just pull a 1-2 degrees worth of timing out but your tuner should tell you how much if any...
__________________
2000 GT 60' 1.42 1/4 10.49 mph 129.8 |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Regular
2000
10.67
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 135
|
if the tuner is setting the tables right then you should have nothing to worry about cause the computer should pull n add the correct amount of timing and fuel based off of the MAF N IAT readings
__________________
2000 GT 60' 1.42 1/4 10.49 mph 129.8 |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Regular
2000
10.67
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 135
|
__________________
2000 GT 60' 1.42 1/4 10.49 mph 129.8 |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cedar Falls, IA
Posts: 1,007
|
So... 450 hp at 12# of boost is not safer than 425 hp at 14# of boost?
Where's the best place for the IAT? haha, I guess a better question would be What is the IAT? I think it's the thing that comes off of the plenum and connects to your intake tube but I'm not sure. If this is true, it means I just bought a couple of pulleys I'll probably never be able to use until I go forged... if that ever happens
__________________
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1997 Mustang GT
11.01@128.32
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Seale, Alabama
Posts: 1,191
|
IAT= intake air temperature..
its not a sensor |
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
2000
10.67
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Island Lake, IL
Posts: 135
|
yes it is a sensor....
the 96-00 have a seperate sensor where the 01+ have it has part of the MAF... and the best place for it is after the blower about 6inchs before the TB so the computer can read what the incoming air temp is... most kits have it routed to the power pipe which is not a good way to do and a good way to blow the motor with temp changes the computer needs to see the incoming air temp to adjust timing and fuel correctly.... if its before the blower its going to read the outside temp and not what the real temp going into the motor is... the blower will heat the crap out of the air... if you have a intercooler it still needs to be after the intercooler and before the TB
__________________
2000 GT 60' 1.42 1/4 10.49 mph 129.8 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: D1 vs. P1 Procharger Head Units
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| intercooler and discharge piping for procharger head unit | SilverStang03 | 99-04 | 3 | September 13th, 2008 11:15 AM |
| procharger p1sc head unit | SilverStang03 | 99-04 | 16 | September 12th, 2008 11:34 AM |
| Head Units and Radio | 04mustang232 | The Clubhouse | 5 | May 9th, 2008 11:51 PM |
| Aftermarket head units and the METRA harnes for the mach 460 question | RanGer498 | Electronics | 7 | April 30th, 2008 11:03 PM |
| question about head units!! | B0B | 99-04 | 7 | April 4th, 2008 11:23 PM |