| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
i know a guy that ran them with his 70mm turbo and he didn't hit full boost till 4k or higher...i mean they will work but they definitely aren't the best thing for a boosted motor. i mean they are a n/a cam.
stock cams would hit full boost around 3500-3800
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
they will be ok...but not the best choice...i wouldn't doubt it if you regret it once its time for boost
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
02 mustang gt
6.92 @ 99 mph 1/8th
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: san diego,ca
Posts: 681
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
They will work fine for supercharged apps, now turbo is a different story all together, the cams need to release more exhaust sooner to be reach peak efficentcy for the turbo to spool up
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
even more reason not to get them lol...as the guy i was referring to has a 70mm turbo.
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 Mustang GT
14.03@100
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,067
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Just get something like MMR Turbo cams. How much boost you lookin' to run?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
well the bottom end is stock.. so until I beef it up it wont be to high.. 10# ish...
I will be picking up the turbo this weekend.... And what do you all think about fabricating some custome turbo headers?.. I found a site that has the tubing and even has the heagder flange for the 4.6
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
02 Mustang GT
9.91@133
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,307
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I have the whole hotside, h-pipe and magnaflow magnapack exhaust for sell, but you would need two turbos.
__________________
2002 GT PI heads Twin 60mm turbos Th400 6.34@114 1/8 9.99@137 1/4 http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t...t/DSCF5654.jpg http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t...2gt/IMG060.jpg |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 Mustang GT
14.03@100
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,067
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Get the MMR stage 1 Turbo cams or Stage 2 Turbo cams
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
yeah i guess I will be selling my brand new comp 270's.. and will be looking at some turbo cams..
but what about the custom turbo headers idea? think its worth it? or should I use the stock manifolds?
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
i would just use stock manifolds...you are gonna have all the horsepower your stock shortblock can take anyway even with the stock manifolds...
and if you get a built motor you can just throw a set on then if you want when everything is out and apart... JMO i dunno about a 66mm but on 10lbs and a 70mm i know most guys are hitting the limit of what you would wanna push the shortblock to. and thats on stock motor dude on here has 70mm and hit 400 on 8lbs...and other dude i referred to earlier hit 425 on 8lbs with the comp 270's.
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
well then itwill be a max of 8lbs.. or what ever is close to 400whp.. until a built bottom end goes in..
and its a Turbonetics T-66, Q trim, A/R 1.00, and is rated to 900hp
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
8lbs would probably put you very close to 400...like right on. unless you need more boost with a smaller turbo...not sure. just sharing what i have found about the 70mm..
anyway, good luck
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Regular
Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 290
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ebay
__________________
Stock.....
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
well I found this site
Merge Collectors True Merge Collectors could get mostof the hot sideparts from here.. fairly reasonably.. But another question would be.. better to gowith a blow through MAF?
__________________
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Comp 270's ok with boost?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pi heads with comp 270's | MeMz | Videos | 0 | May 28th, 2009 08:14 PM |
| VT Blower Cams Vs Comp 270's | 97GT4.6 | 96-98 | 13 | December 16th, 2008 04:42 PM |
| Gas Mileage With Comp 270's? | Schraders | 99-04 | 11 | August 12th, 2008 03:53 PM |