| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,479
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
UPR lower control arms.
99-04 Mustang Pro Series Chrome Moly Adjustable Lower Control Arms No Perch
These look pretty legit. Does anyone have experience with UPR control arms? Honestly, I won't be launching the car a whole lot. I just want something that will hold at the track and allow her to hook better. They have a whole bunch of styles...some require the removal of the rear sway bar...if I remove the rear sway bar will it hurt/affect me cornering/daily driving? |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
2001 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 722
![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I would get the set without the perch and keeping your rear sway bar
__________________
01 GT Vert - Triple Black - 2v 5.4 270/340 00 Lightning - Triple Black - 2v SC 5.4 400/500 Brand New Tubular UCA and LCA set for sale PM me Slightly Used 05-09 Halo Headlights for sale PM me
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
BYAHHHH!
2001 Mustang GT
13.874
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 14,793
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
get one get spherical or both if you want. But the rear sway bar perch is fine but if your a track car you dont NEED to really but doesn't matter to much
__________________
![]() Precision Turbo|TurboSmart|TeamZ|Strange|Hellion|BBK|SCT|Edge Converters|Fairbanks|CG Fabrications|Treadstone |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,479
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Sphereical meaning the bushing material? The one I posted has no sway bar mount so you are saying I should get these ones:
99-04 Mustang Chrome Moly Adjustable Urethane Lower Control Arms Or these ones: 1999-2004 Ford Mustang Pro Series Lower Control Arms with Sway Bar Mount - UPR Products or these: 99-04 Mustang Elite Chrome Moly Solid Urethane Lower Control Arms I am confused...all this talk about spherical, single adjustable, double adjustable, shit idk which ones to get. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 Mustang GT
14.03@100
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,067
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Spherical is the metal looking bushing on one end. Poly being the rubber looking one.
BTW UPR doesn't make a LCA with a sway bar mount and no perch. You could probably get the one w/ the perch and cut it off some how. Get the first one you posted in your 2nd post. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,479
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
But why does it matter if I get the ones with the spring perch or not. Its not like I am using them anyhow. And the point of going with a spherical bushing on one end and poly other is because.....??
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 Mustang GT
14.03@100
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,067
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It doesn't matter. It may a total of 1 pound to your car by getting one w/ perches vs. one w/o perches. Idk why they say to get the one spherical, one poly. I have the BMR LCA's and they are poly on both sides.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
Because sphericals transmit a lot of noise, but polys don't articulate for crap.
By having a spherical on one side and a poly on the other, you get the freedom of motion the spherical provides without having all the buzz transmitted into the cabin. Spring perch is if you're using stock location springs (i.e. no rear coilovers). You'd know if you didn't need the sway bar brackets - you'd either be using a rear sway bar that attaches differently, or have your rear springs rates high enough that a bar was unnecessary. Adjustable for fox-chassis LCAs is in terms of the ride height. If you're using coilovers, you definitely don't need adjustables. Adjustables are designed so you can corner-weight your car, though people use them to just adjust ride height for aesthetic reasons.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,789
![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
Man I was confused, then I realized you were talking about a different kind of adjustable control arm.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 2,789
![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
Like he said about the bushings, although I would say there are alot of Foxbodies rolling around with double poly's. They aren't interested in twisties though, they are strictly muscle bound light to light or 1/4 mile cars. In drag racing, solids like the one you posted first will get you the most power to the ground fastest. Then poly's and then rubbers. Problem with a dd car is solids are not forgiving as far as road noise and defects go. Same reason people put solid motor mounts on a drag car. No deflection. Single adjustables are control arms that you have to take one end loose to adjust, like the ones you posted (most lowers are). Double adjustables are ones that have 2 jam nuts and a adjuster in the middle that you can adjust without disconnecting. Those will mainly be on uppers to make it easy to adjust your pinion angle at the track.
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: UPR lower control arms.
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UPR Control Arms | RFM 40th V6 | V6 Mustangs | 8 | January 23rd, 2010 06:44 PM |
| UPR control arms ordered | lcorriveau3 | V6 Mustangs | 8 | December 15th, 2009 08:22 PM |
| How are UPR lower control arms on our cars? | 03_StangGuy | 99-04 | 41 | June 6th, 2009 08:22 PM |
| Upper Control Arms & Lower Control Arms | LUV2XLR8 | 2005 - 2010 | 6 | October 6th, 2007 11:45 AM |
| Steeda lower control arms (Trailing arms)? | kmjsmith | 2005 - 2010 | 6 | July 4th, 2007 04:59 PM |