| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
Hmmm.
I've been running the idea of going 5.4 here lately through my head and I'm liking the idea the more I think about it. I know its been done many many times before but I'm not sure what all options there are for this swap.
Like what motor would be best, what all little odds n ends I'd need, what would be the most straight forward swap, what all could swap over from my current 4.6, have the long tubes issue been straightened out yet? etc, etc, etc. I'm doing some research now but it's kind of overwhelming to me b/c I really can't find anything straight forward to get me in the right direction. I just did a search as well on here but nothing was coming up.
__________________
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2001 MustangGT
14.039@100(60ft 2.2)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,228
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
Yes. I've read through it a few times actually and have thought about doing it and still may consider it. The numbers, mainly the torque, you can get with the swap N/A is a big draw of it to me.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 133
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
There is a replacement for displacement............I says WHIPPLE on it!
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
If I do any supercharging, I'm going with a p1sc.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
go with the upgraded p1sc-1 or the d1sc. the standard p1sc falls in last place for decent blowers. i imagine this may upset some people but i have posted this several times. the p1sc has an old school impeller with strait veins and it cant compeat with the newer procharger units
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
I'll definitely go with the p1sc-1 forsure if I ultimately decide to stay 4.6, which I have a feeling a will but I like the idea of a 5.4 too much right now to just rule it out.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,540
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
the 5.4 2v just isnt an n/a motor no matter how you cut it. it makes good tq, but not top end power. if you do get into a set up where you can rev it, then piston speed can get up there in a hurry. the 5.4 does fine on boost, and the longer rod is favorable for it. a built 4.6 will make good tq #'s and able to rev it where you set it up for.
__________________
![]() project warhorse under construction wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning) being built by MP2 Performance |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Moderator
2012 300a gt auto
12.10@116
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: creighton pa
Posts: 7,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
on an mild N/A car that will see some track time, 5.4 is your only choice. a serious track effort, dyno queen, d/d, cruise inn wanna be, etc, stick with the 4.6.
__________________
MM BRACKET RACING CREW CO-FOUNDER BAMA Performance Drag Team Founder 2012 300a GT auto
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
Sounds like I could really go either way.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
2012 300a gt auto
12.10@116
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: creighton pa
Posts: 7,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
give it some more though before you commit one way or the other is your best bet
__________________
MM BRACKET RACING CREW CO-FOUNDER BAMA Performance Drag Team Founder 2012 300a GT auto
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hooo Ha Ha
|
Sweet is correct
N/A the 5.4 is really a dog in stock form. Seriously lol unless your read to throw some heads and cams on it before you even start dont bother. The stock heads and cams dont flow enough air to make any power past 4000 really. Now if your boosting thats another story. They'll make more power for less boost. I should be right up around 380-400 on 8psi or so You can pull like 350 out of them N/A if you get some really agressive cams and heads. Probobly over 400 torque or so Its up to you really. But dont plan on reving much over 5500...iv tried it once and she sounded like she wanted to blow to peices <5.4 2v
__________________
![]() 410rwhp 520rwtq @ 12.9 psi |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 717
Posts: 2,383
![]() ![]() iTrader: 6 reviews
|
Thanks guys. I'm just gonna stick with the 2v turd lol.
Will still be badass when I do all the power mods I want to it, so I'll definitely be satisfied.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 376
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm a bit in the same boat, but my current plans are for a mark 8 4v. Gonna build it up as much as I can n/a then prolly procharge. Good luck with whatever you do!
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Hmmm.
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hmmm... | XTCNAGT | The Clubhouse | 8 | January 7th, 2010 02:47 AM |
| Hmmm | Till | The Clubhouse | 0 | February 23rd, 2009 05:40 PM |
| hmmm | HMUSN | The Clubhouse | 17 | August 22nd, 2008 02:02 PM |
| hmmm how fun would it be...? | supermachone | The Clubhouse | 10 | August 7th, 2008 11:28 PM |
| Hmmm? | shroom | The Clubhouse | 20 | April 12th, 2008 02:06 PM |