| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
supercharged : dyno results
hey guys got the gt back from the shop procharged running 8.64 psi & intercooled on a conservative tune. It was a Mustang Dyno, with all that said she produced 335whp & 345tq. Does this seem accuracte? Also why do people tell me it's a "Mustang Dyno" does this affect the numbers? Thanks Guys
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
Mustang Dyno's compensate for certain factors and usually result in a lower HP/TQ rating. The numbers are just #'s man as long as you are happy with it thats all that matters.
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
BWAL Is My Hero
2003 F150 S-Crew 5.4 FX4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 10,759
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
If the base pull was done (225WHP) on the same dyno, under similar conditions, then the numbers seem correct to me. 110WHP and a little less than 100RWTQ sounds about right for around 9 PSI. Go to a track and see what you can lay down. That will be the real test of your setup.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
im curious about the diff between mustang dyno and dyno jet. i get my pulls done in sae, std, and uncorrected, just to compair.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
op you should post up your sheet
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 gt
5.4 32v on the way
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 4,191
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
mustang dynos read a bit lower so thats why it matters. If you are happy with the car and it runs right thats what is important, so dont worry so much about your lower numbers.
__________________
2003 Mustang gt - usual mods - slowly working on 5.4 swap 2004 srt4 - Stock DD/winter beater Click here for your tuning needs Before asking a gearing related question click THIS link and enjoy all your saved time. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
okay i was just wondering, and yes im very happy with the numbers more with how she feels. i will post the sheet either tonight or in the morning. my only issue is i have stock gt 17x8's with bf goodwrench tires 245 width. they spin every time i try and get on it, i have put 26k on those tires. uncertain how much previous owner did. so every time i've tried to hit boost for a minute, she spin's. would new tires fix this?
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yes my only question is i would get on the interstate at about 50-60 mph, take off overdrive and stomp it. the traction light would come on and two of the times when that happen it hit rev limit and not shift. i am very new to this sort of power and let off once i saw that green light because i didn't want to mess up anything.
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
your tuner could've/shouldve set your shift point right below or right at 6000rpm and turned off the traction control period if you have a handheld tuner you can do the traction control yourself instead of cutting it off everytime you get in but whomever did your car can do the trac and shiftpoinds in a matter of minutes. As far as your numbers those are decent numbers I put down 339/358 non ic 5psi but its all about how it feels to you.
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i wasn't sure whether is should leave it on or off, thanks. it shifted some but it just feels like it's not catching quite right. sorry if i sound dumb.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
1989 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 249
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Not to hijack the thread, ok, maybe I am, sorry for that, but it seems this thread has pulled in some folks knowledgeable in the supercharger realm. Can I put a supercharger on a 100% stock 89 GT? And it is 100% stock aside from the 2nd set of tires on it, and the pioneer CD deck. Car has 52k miles on it and a stock AOD. Thanks
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
yess you can.
GT - 1988 - FORD - Vortech - Superchargers, Centrifugal Style Kits - Superchargers & Turbochargers - SummitRacing.com
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 gt
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: La grange, KY
Posts: 4,259
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I believe I was only 3-4 hp off on my guess
__________________
Procharged 2000 5 Speed BAB GT, built motor, blower cams, speedy dyno tune 412 hp, 450 rw tqHARDCORE CREW BRIGHT ATLANTIC BLUE CREW #1 MEMBER |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yes you were spot on my friend
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
A mustang dyno reads about 11-12% lower than a dyno jet. So that would put you at 375/386, which are damn good numbers for an auto with a P1sc at 8.6psi.
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thanks man i appreciate it. really happy with it now, it's just a completely different ball game now for me. i know it's not the fastest but i now know why people dish out the money for a supercharger
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
12.35 @ 116
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 1,126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Mustang dynos read lower because they actually put a load on the rollers. Dyno-jet dynos are lighter. Mine was tuned on a Mustang dyno which had a 3000lb load on the rollers, so it takes more power to turn them and get a more accurate reading of RWHP. It acts as the weight of the car on a road. Those are the more "real" horsepower numbers type of dynos.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: supercharged : dyno results
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dyno results | xXJayManZXx17 | 99-04 | 73 | November 24th, 2010 04:43 PM |
| results from the dyno | 1fasts/c2003 | Modular Mustangs | 7 | October 5th, 2010 05:10 AM |
| My Dyno Results | WAVEBYE | The Clubhouse | 46 | October 25th, 2007 09:47 PM |
| My DYNO results are in!! | Bossman | 2005 - 2010 | 18 | February 7th, 2007 07:34 PM |
| Dyno results 2004 Supercharged Saleen with mods | WydOpen | 99-04 | 22 | October 19th, 2005 12:39 AM |