| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Vortech V1 Si-trim w/ CX racing intercooler. Any thoughts and opinions would help
Decided to get the Vortech V1 Si-trim tuner kit with an intercooler from CX racing.
cxracing.com: BOV + 31x12x3 inch Universal Intercooler + 3" Turbo Piping Kit For MUSTANG Celica Issue 1- I think the air-air charger from Vortech would prolly be better but my budget disagrees. For the time being I'm only shooting for around 400RWHP..mabye a few less. It supports 600-800 HP so I'd think it'd work for what I want.. I'm wondering, would the air-liquid intercooler drop the the temp enough to keep me safe from possible detanation? Keeping in mind that this is my summer daily driver so I would imagine it could get real hot, real quick. What you guys think? Issue 2- The kit comes with 6-8 psi with the 3.60 pulley if I remember right. But if I'm running that intercooler won't the boost level automatically drop since their is more volume to fill?? So would I need to get a smaller pulley to increase the boost back up to 8psi or would the lower boost of like 5psi be equivalent to the 8psi w/o a intercooler since the air is cooler and condensed??? Or can I run more boost since it is intercooled? REALLY got myself confused on this issue of how the boost changes/effects power with intercooler. Help please!
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
12.35 @ 116
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 1,126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
That's the one I have on my V1 S-trim setup. Fit with no issues except you have to drill a 3.5" hole in your fenderwell (engine bay) so the one S shaped pipe and fit through. With a 3.33" pulley on mine, it would only make ~6lbs of boost per what was told to my tuner from Vortech themselves. I'd recommend a 3.12, that should be around 10lbs. I had a 2.87" on mine with this intercooler and AFM Powerpipe, made 13lbs, 411rwhp, and only 14* of total timing in it....then it blew up LOL. You would also have to make a hole/flange welded to put a BOV or BPV of your choice on.
__________________
Vortech boosted MMR900 and supporting mods 420rwhp 410rwtq loaded Mustang Dyno Turbo boost in progress |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Great setup! Many guys run it. I have a 3" cxracing intercooler waiting to go on. The Si is an awesome blower. I only have a V1 S trim. You should loose 2-3psi through the intercooler so you will want to go with a 3.33 pulley and powerpipe with the Si. You'll get 10psi this way. You can get a cxracing kit for a Mustang off of ebay for around $280 shipped.
Wit the intercooler you need to decide if you want to run a draw thru maf like the non-intercooled Vortech comes with or convert to a blow thru maf.
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
01 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 50
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
With any FMIC you can expect to lose about 1-2 PSI boost but will not see a decrease in power. Due to the fact you are shooting for 400 ish rwhp you will be pushing the limits of the stock internals on 2v motors. IIRC they are rated for max of about 450 so overall useage of the motor will be about 85-90% so it will handle it but it would be a good idea to upgrade internals too.
GL with the setup
__________________
BBK CAI, Ford GT Fuel Pump, Ford RAcing Fuel Rail, Ford Lightning MAF, 4.10's DIablo Tuned Mac OR H-pipe, Mac Cat-Back, Lil Purple Go-Fast Bottle
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Premium Member
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Dayton Ohio area
Posts: 669
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Look up on engineering toolbox online and look up pressure drop through pipes, this will help u pick the right pully size to compensate...
__________________
2004 2v GT--3.90's, t3650, H&R SS, 78mm TB, K&N CAI, steeda bump stop kit, HP Blues shocks and struts, soon to have a rear seat delete, light weight driveshaft. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang GT
12.85 @ 114
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 3,225
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
that is a good intercooler, that is what I use.
You defiantly want to go air to air if you are expecting hot temperatures. Water can only hold so much heat before it gets hot. Then dont forget its gonna cool off... and its not gonna do that in a closed-hood hot engine-bay I promise you that haha oh and with that intercooler you are gonna want to run a blowthorugh system, and you will need to mount your BOV on the pipe that connects your blower to the intercooler itself.
__________________
![]() MODS: Vortech V1 T-Trim @ 7.5 PSI (tuned down) Comp Cam Stage 2's + more 432 rwhp / 396 rwtq 02/27/2011 NEW VIDEOS! **It takes ~$60 a rwhp (over stock) for a 99-04 Mustang GT.** Do the Math ![]() C2H5OH on the horizon |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 2,392
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I had that intercooler in my eclipse. Run great!
__________________
.............................2000 GT Vert............................. ![]() How To Cut/Remove springs |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
OK so sounds like I need to get the 3.33 pulley vs the standard 3.60 that comes with the kit to compensate for the boost that will be lost through the I/C. But is the powerpipe really necessary? I'm getting everything installed by Brenspeed and they told me that 10 psi would be pushing the bottom end on my engine.. Or is 10 psi with an I/C different than 10 psi w/o an I/C? And why a blow thru MAF rather than the draw thru one that comes with the kit? What's the differnce?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
11.463@121.50
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE PA
Posts: 1,644
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I was at 10PSI of boost in the cold weather, when I broke a piston (stock bottom end).
I don't think an intercooler would have saved this from happening, as the air temperature was about 50 degrees and I didn't do a particularly long pull when it went.
__________________
MM Bracket Racing Crew Member #5 |
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
i would go with the 31x12x4 ic if you plan on building a motor down the road. i just had my car tuned down with a 3.33 pulley and layed down 458 rwhp at 5500 rpm's (ran out of fuel). im not sure about the v1 si trim cause i had a v3 on my car and i belive the v1 has a diff step ratio. the only reason i like the 4 core over the 3 core is you dont have to turn the blower as hard to make the same power. this helps keep iat's down and is safer in the summer. the power pipe is a good idea cause the vortech intake sucks
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
. Tuners need to make adjustments for this in the tune. Many people run draw thru with an intercooler without a problem so it is really up to you. Which maf comes with the kit? I'm pretty sure Vortech does not supply mafs with their kits. It's probably a lightning 90mm maf that they are offering with the kit. If you decide to go blow thru get the PMAS HPX slot style maf. PM Trick Tuners for pricing.[/QUOTE]
Is it fine to stay with the draw throug set up with an intercooler as long as your IAT sensor is separate from your maf and its mounted in between the blower outlet and throttle body?
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
IATs aren't the main reason people switch from draw thru to blow thru. The way your describing it is the right way of doing it on a draw thru setup. That's how my non-intercooled is setup right now. If you switch to a blow thru maf that doesn't have integrated iat readings then you will need to keep your iat sensor mounted in that same location. The HPX slot style maf has an integrated iat reading so there is no need for a separate iat. It's fine to run draw thru or blow thru. If you can get draw thru to work without an issue, which many can, then your good. Some have had issues with driveability and maf backwash from the bypass valve blowing air onto the maf. A blow thru offers a "true" reading of the amount of air entering the engine because it is placed right before the throttle body.
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
Gotcha great details appreciate that.
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Cool guys thanks for the feed back. ..So looks like I'll go with the blow thru MAF since it'll gimme the most accurate air travel info for the cpu, which should result in a lil bit smoother running engine w/o any interference. So the 3.33 pulley w/ a powerpipe, and I/C of course would put me at bout 10 psi. Don't think I wanna risk runnin 10 psi and doin any damage on my bottom end. Thinking I could run that combo tho and have it tuned down to bout 8 psi and shoot for bout 380 RWHP..give or take. That should work out ok huh?
Plus, I'm all about making more boost and keeping a lower IAT.
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ok been doing some research and the general thoughts seem to be that the aftercooler..like the one I'm lookin at can get heat soaked pretty easy in traffic and take about 10 mins of steady cruising to cool back off. Where as an air-air only takes a couple mins. The thing is there is a annual street cruise in my town where I'm stuck in bumper to bumper traffic, usually for a few hours straight. Usually takes bout 40 mins to move a block!
Should I be concerned about getting heat soaked when the S/C isn't even building boost?
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
![]() 2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60' Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60' Intercooled: 362/370 |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ugh so Vortech's website says that if I'm running over 6psi I'll need a bypass valve from them..not sure why. I was gonna run a BOV instead, the one that came with the I/C from CX racing, so it could vent into the atmosphere. I can run that BOV can't I? And any thoughts on that particular one? And they say they recommend a cog belt drive for a heavy duty S/C like the V1. That necessary? Thought I had this setup figure out but now I'm unclear again
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/99-04/200790-vortech-v1-si-trim-w-cx-racing-intercooler-any-thoughts-opinions-would-help.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Thread Vortech V1 Si-trim w/ CX racing intercooler. Any thoughts and opinions would help | Forums at Modded Mustangs | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | November 30th, 2011 03:35 PM | |
Threads Similar to: Vortech V1 Si-trim w/ CX racing intercooler. Any thoughts and opinions would help
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Whats the difference between vortech V-3 Si-Trim and V-2 SQ-Trim | GT Pony7 | 2005 - 2010 | 3 | July 27th, 2010 01:20 AM |
| Vortech S-trim to T-trim is really worth it? | jivepepper | 99-04 | 41 | September 6th, 2009 04:50 PM |
| Vortech & Cams OR Vortech & After/Intercooler | StuTheMusicEngineer | 99-04 | 21 | January 4th, 2009 10:51 PM |
| For Sale: 00-04 Vortech SQ Trim Blower custom Intercooler | blownvert | Northeast | 1 | August 16th, 2007 09:46 AM |