| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Premium Member
99 limited edition vert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tacoma,Washington
Posts: 3,297
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
mustang dyno to dyno jet conversion
Just had my car dyno'd on a mustang dyno (hitting rev limiter@5800
) and got 424/460, what would that be on a dyno jet?More interested in people that have dyno'd on both, but any idea would be appreciated
__________________
KB'd 446rwhp/451rwtq, Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDpQ0EEm1MTuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
honestly it depends on how the dyno's are "loaded". Tuners can load them light or heavy. But usually dynojets have dynoed a little higher in MY experience. Maybe 5-10hp
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
Nice numbers. Dyno sheet? Sorry can't help you on the conversion.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Premium Member
99 limited edition vert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tacoma,Washington
Posts: 3,297
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
, it was a dyno day and #'s seemed about par with what was dyno'd and what they had done before
__________________
KB'd 446rwhp/451rwtq, Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDpQ0EEm1MTuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
BWAL Is My Hero
2003 F150 S-Crew 5.4 FX4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 10,759
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
There really is no "conversion".... Remember the dyno is just a tool to dail your car in. People get to stuck on the numbers... Take it to the track if you really want to find out what your car is made of... Dyno numbers are just good for bench/internet racing.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
BWAL Is My Hero
2003 F150 S-Crew 5.4 FX4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 10,759
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Why would you care what brand the dyno is? As long as it is one of the big three anyway?
Also, if Joe did his tune he has nothing to worry about anyway. Joe is awesome. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Premium Member
99 limited edition vert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tacoma,Washington
Posts: 3,297
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
no scanner, but the hp curve was climbing til it hit limiter and the torque curve,should I say lack of, was flat as hell,from what I can tell from sheet it was at 450 @ 2000 staying flat till ~4200 then dropping to ~420 then finally falling to ~395 @ 5800
__________________
KB'd 446rwhp/451rwtq, Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDpQ0EEm1MTuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com Last edited by limited; January 22nd, 2011 at 03:31 PM. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2006
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,604
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I have heard that the difference is 11-12%.
__________________
RIP 06 Mustang GT New Ride 04 GTO K&N intake, Dynatech Long Tube Headers, Magnaflow catted X, Flow 40s, MS3 Cam and dynotuned by Texas Speed. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2001 Bullitt
12.25@110.4
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,599
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Yeah, even the same dyno brand and models don't read the same. The Mustang dyno can be manipulated by the operator to read pretty much whatever they want.
A good example is my car a couple years ago: On 3 different DynoJets within a month, with the same car, same mods: BWR - 256rwhp Comp Auto - 262rwhp ProDyno - 271 rwhp As long as you use the same dyno, with the same setup in it for every run, it's a tool to compare how well your mods are doing, and the current state of your tune.
__________________
Bolt-On Bullitt... Unmodified longblock, stock intake and throttle body. 266rwhp/306rwtq 12.25@110.4 1.64 60ft Currently Under Reconstruction
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Premium Member
99 limited edition vert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tacoma,Washington
Posts: 3,297
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
curious, why not. it does help knowing, remember I am on stock long block. 424hp is safe on a dynojet, just getting an idea on what to compare to on a popular dyno
__________________
KB'd 446rwhp/451rwtq, Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDpQ0EEm1MTuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Premium Member
99 limited edition vert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tacoma,Washington
Posts: 3,297
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thats what I am afraid of, that would put me in a different cat. with stock LB
__________________
KB'd 446rwhp/451rwtq, Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDpQ0EEm1MTuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
BWAL Is My Hero
2003 F150 S-Crew 5.4 FX4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 10,759
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
You can't say this number is safe or that number is safe... People get hung up on the numbers. The numbers mean nothing really. You want a safe tune, numbers be damned. Some people have been running on tunes nearing 500rwhp for years. Are thier tunes unsafe? Even though they have been running them for years? Sure, generally around over 450RWHP on a stock two valve is the limit. But a dyno operator can manipulate the numbers to read whatever he wants. Again, the key is that you have a good tune. If you have a good tune, who cares what your numbers are as long as you are happy with the car, right?
Don't get me wrong, you can strap your car down to a hundred dyno's if you want. But its a fruitless effort. Because the numbers really do mean nothing but bragging rights. The only true real world measure of how much power your car has is time slips. If you are truly worried about reliability you should never have installed forced induction on your car. Its a risk you take once you add more than factory power. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 109.45 N/A
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 3,417
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: -1 reviews
|
It depends entirely on how the tuner sets up the load for your car and on the calibration of other dyno. On average, mustang dynos read a bit lower than dynojets because mustang dynos increase load in accordance with speed to take into accound wind resistance whereas the load placed on a car running on a dynojet is constant.
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
BWAL Is My Hero
2003 F150 S-Crew 5.4 FX4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 10,759
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
In my experience, fewer tuners that have dynojets actually cough up the extra money for load cells and they are just statically loaded. Via the weight in the drum. Where as Mustangdyno's come standard with load cells. I don't have my flash drive with me right this second, but if you want the spreadsheet PM me. I can send it to you. (Goes for anyone) |
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Premium Member
99 limited edition vert
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tacoma,Washington
Posts: 3,297
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
KB'd 446rwhp/451rwtq, Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZDpQ0EEm1MTuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Newbie
2002 roush
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rock city
Posts: 30
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I had almost 40 hp differance on two dynojet dynos. Like someone else said take it too the track if you really want to know.
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 109.45 N/A
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 3,417
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: -1 reviews
|
That is really good to know Jake. I was always told (by many dyno tuners themselves) that the dynojets are not able to adjust the load on the car. The tq readings are determined by how fast a car can accelerate the weighted drums vs a brake type drum setup where the load is introduced based on specific inputs. I would be interested to see how this is achieved.
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
BWAL Is My Hero
2003 F150 S-Crew 5.4 FX4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 10,759
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2001 Bullitt
12.25@110.4
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,599
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
The point is, the difference isn't enough to matter when dealing with longevity.
__________________
Bolt-On Bullitt... Unmodified longblock, stock intake and throttle body. 266rwhp/306rwtq 12.25@110.4 1.64 60ft Currently Under Reconstruction
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: mustang dyno to dyno jet conversion
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recent Dyno Numbers (Mustang Dyno) | SKRMNGT | 99-04 | 13 | February 11th, 2010 12:36 PM |
| Mustang Dyno vs. Dynojet Dyno | kenneth | 2005 - 2010 | 7 | November 5th, 2009 01:23 PM |
| Mustang Dyno vs Dyno Jet | BLOWN89 | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | December 1st, 2007 10:34 PM |
| Dyno Jet vs Mustang dyno | bransdaman78 | General Tech | 6 | April 2nd, 2007 05:23 PM |
| Mustang Dyno Global Dyno Day! | BadMoFo | Southeast | 1 | September 20th, 2006 04:09 PM |