| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing long or short tube headers in the 99-04 Forum. i currently have a bbk off road x pipe 2.5 inch flowmasters no cats ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 23
|
long or short tube headers
i currently have a bbk off road x pipe 2.5 inch flowmasters no cats 70mm accufab throttle body,4.10 gears and a k and n cold air intake. trying to find which would be a better set of headers long or short tube. what is the main difference between the two?
thanks in advance Gates |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 456
|
long tube
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280 |
|
|
#3 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Newport News VA/Kuwait
Posts: 38
|
Long tube headers are just that, long tube. they extend down about halfway past the stock mid pipe and make more power and sound better. shortys are basically stock replacements and arent worth the money. to do long tubes you'd have to change your x pipe, for shorties you won't.
__________________
2008 Grabber Orange Mustang GT 2001 Ford F150 XLT (the daily) 1998 Ford Mustang GT (in a coma) |
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
1991 LX, 2003 SNK, 2007 S
11.3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 956
|
shorties fit better
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
2004 Mach1
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Candyland
Posts: 221
|
lt's give you more highend power as where shorties give you more torque from what I've read
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New jersey
Posts: 1,559
|
long tubes are going to boost your hp and torque alot more than shorties
__________________
Heres a real funny video youtube.com/watch?v=ojB7KkaR03I VTEC stands for Very Torqueless Economy Car Honda stands for Hold On Not Done Accelerating 1991 LX 5.0 H/B(T-70 turbo coming soon) |
|
|
#7 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 456
|
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280 |
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
They've gone plaid!
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 112
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Posts: 10,552
|
I plan on going the longtube route and having a shop cut my midpipe to fit.
__________________
![]() A hard-on doesn't count as personal growth until I'm furiously jacking you off ![]() MM BBM Crew Member #1 join |
||
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
1991 LX, 2003 SNK, 2007 S
11.3
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 956
|
or you could do like my notch just long tube headers
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3
|
Well, long tube headders will give you more power at lower rpm and a deeper sound all with less clearance. Shorties on the other hand will give you more top end power with less sound and more clearance. It's all about how you want to drive your stang
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 Mustang V6
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,583
|
and if u want to turbo u would need shorties
__________________
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,077
|
uh. no
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12
|
Long tubes: More power and better sound!
|
|
|
#14 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 8,981
|
long tubes imo. shorties are fine to keep bottome end torque but most people dont spend enough time below 3500 rpm's to utilze it. turbos require manifolds/headers of their own.
__________________
right now, she is a jackstand warrior if the car was a horse, i would shoot it!!! ![]() project warhorse under construction |
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,780
|
long tubes FTMFW!!
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 196
|
but arent longtubes illegal?
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,378
|
screw shorties, long tubes FTW!!!
__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2.../matrixsig.jpg |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1,003
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7
|
what are good long headers? i dont know many brands but i want my stang to be louder and deeper, i was think some long headers, x midpipe and SLP cat back, i only know the SLP brand, what are some good header and midpipe brands
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 1,794
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: long or short tube headers
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Long tube headers or short tube headers? | 2much4u | 99-04 | 20 | October 11th, 2009 10:49 PM |
| Long tube vs short tube headers Pros and cons | cams-shelbycobra07 | Exhaust | 3 | July 16th, 2007 08:41 PM |
| short tube or long tube headers? | ishyton4bangers | V6 Mustangs | 6 | July 16th, 2007 01:37 PM |
| short tube vs long tube | Mustang RacR94 | V6 Mustangs | 17 | February 26th, 2007 12:42 AM |
| Long Tube/ short tube | OTreborO | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | June 15th, 2006 04:21 PM |