| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 Mustang GT
1/8 - 7.92 @ 91.13mph 1/4 - 12.21 @ 115.84mph
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weymouth, MA
Posts: 13,446
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 12 reviews
|
Not only the torque, but your rwhp will be higher in the lower RPM's. This is something that really needs to be tested out vs calculating numbers. So many different things affect it.
What I would like to see, is Tom, pulley it for say 16psi. Bleed off at 9-10psi. Compare the dyno sheets, then compare slips from the track.
__________________
![]() Vortech V1 Intercooled @ 11psi 394rwhp/392rwtq @ 9.5psi 415rwhp/400rwtq @ 11psi on Methanol Tuned By: Pete @ Performance Dyno Affordable Supercharger Build Guide Supercharger Info for Noobs |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#42 | |
|
Proud American
|
What is the measure of boost? Its not the volume of air going in a motor, its not the speed the air is going in the motor.... its the RESISTANCE that motor has to extra air. Put a restrictive exhaust on a car and you'll make more boost, but make less power... Same thought process with the intercoolers... lets intercool make less boost but make more power (cooler air charge) So now lets take a centri car pullied for 12 PSI. (I don't have real numbers in front of me, so these are made up). IATS are fine, and it makes 400 HP at 5800 RPM. Now lets take that same motor, pulley it for 20 psi (most the blowers on stock motors, aren't even capable of that amount of boost). So now we have a much much higher resistance of how much the motor can take in air wise. Think of electricity in the instance (been working on circuits homework, so its in my mind). The more resistance, the hotter the wire gets right, thus why there are bigger (smaller gauge) wires. So now we are running more boost (higher resistance) on the same engine (gauge wire) its going to make more heat. We have tried this with more than once car, a 393 cubic inch small block with a really nice set of heads (300 plus CFM at .650" liftm right where the cam is)and a Procharger D3. Pullied it for 12 PSI and put a boost controller on it at 8 psi( electronic waste gate). It went 3 tenths slower and 4 MPH slower than when its pullied for 8 at 6800 RPM. That is just one example. I will tell you this.... If you want me to make the numbers work and show you the equations, I have more than enough resources to prove to you its not worth it. You cannot disprove the laws of thermodynamics and fluid dynamics.
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions 25.3 SFI Chassis Build Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
12.35 @ 116
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 1,126
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Anywho, thats on a Mustang Dyno if it matters.
__________________
Vortech boosted MMR900 and supporting mods 420rwhp 410rwtq loaded Mustang Dyno Turbo boost in progress |
|
|
|
#44 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,311
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
My car was originally tuned on a Mustang Dyno. The Dynojets its been on since have shown lower or equal numbers. I do not know why people say a Mustang Dyno reads lower.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 Mustang GT
1/8 - 7.92 @ 91.13mph 1/4 - 12.21 @ 115.84mph
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weymouth, MA
Posts: 13,446
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 12 reviews
|
Thats cool man. But Im just saying, your over exacturating on the whole making heat thing. Like I said, Im at a 2.87 pulley, and Im still below the blowers max RPM, and Im not having any issues with that. If I put a powerpipe on, and a better intercooler, I could hit 15-16psi with it. Now if I set the wastegate at 10psi, Im only going to see gains in the midrange, and it might lose alittle power up top, but nothing to drastic. We just need someone to do this. An entry level blower on one of these cars. I know people do it with bigger models, like F1C, and YSi's, I think even D1SC people do it.
__________________
![]() Vortech V1 Intercooled @ 11psi 394rwhp/392rwtq @ 9.5psi 415rwhp/400rwtq @ 11psi on Methanol Tuned By: Pete @ Performance Dyno Affordable Supercharger Build Guide Supercharger Info for Noobs |
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,311
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
This is something to ponder... but I've not given up entirely on the idea but it is something to ponder. What other motors have you tired this with?
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2003 Mustang GT
1/8 - 7.92 @ 91.13mph 1/4 - 12.21 @ 115.84mph
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weymouth, MA
Posts: 13,446
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 12 reviews
|
Exactly, rather then dropping to say 5psi, youd be at 10psi already....idk I really think this is just something that has to be done.
__________________
![]() Vortech V1 Intercooled @ 11psi 394rwhp/392rwtq @ 9.5psi 415rwhp/400rwtq @ 11psi on Methanol Tuned By: Pete @ Performance Dyno Affordable Supercharger Build Guide Supercharger Info for Noobs |
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Proud American
|
Well I hope you guys get the results you want. But on my EFI renegade setup on my car... its only pullied with a 3.25 top and a 8 inch crank. just idling gets warmer than you want to touch the blower or the discharge tubes. I am not intercooled, but its pullied for around 17 PSI at sealevel, it makes 12 psi at this altitiude...
Also at this altitude I have been told by procharger directly on that same D3 on my firends car that we can spin it higher than recommened because we dont compress as much air with the less pressure. We have been 20000 rpm faster than recommeneded on that blower, and its amazing. how much it richens up because of the less dense air charger (this was before we did a back seat intercooler). Good luck guys I hope you get the results you want, but at the track (all I care about, the street it makes way to much power to do anything) it will mostlikey be slower with the same varaibles.
__________________
RIP Travis Billings ![]() Special Thanks to: Andrews Racing Transmissions Baseline Suspensions 25.3 SFI Chassis Build Never Lift Racecars |
|
|
|
#49 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,311
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Thanks for all the information. I'm going to pass on this. The anticipated gains are small, there are known drawbacks with small pulleys and it has apparently failed to improve performance on other motors.
Thans again for the information. That's the great thing about Modded Mustangs. We can exchange ideas and learn from what others have tried.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Turbo guys--Supercharger Guy need help.
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| turbo, twin turbo, or supercharger? | mustangman87 | 5.0 Mustangs | 31 | March 6th, 2010 07:35 PM |
| Turbo timers and Boost Controllers? Turbo guys where you at? | 95StangSVT | General Tech | 14 | July 11th, 2008 07:01 AM |
| Supercharger or Turbo? | 2000roush | 99-04 | 20 | April 9th, 2008 06:00 PM |
| Supercharger or Turbo? | torquecars | V6 Mustangs | 26 | April 27th, 2007 06:34 PM |
| Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo | justinsstang | General Tech | 24 | March 7th, 2007 09:07 PM |