| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,391
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Retarding the cam reduces cranking compression, reduces bottom end performance and can increase top end performance. On mod motors usually the cams are ground in a way that fits before ground for performance (we speaking about cams for stock type motors). Mod motors really like the ICL down around 110 degrees but many cams are machine for much higher in order for them to fit correctly.
Most N/A stage 2 cams have too much overlap to pass the sniffer test easily. Your better off with a stage 1 type cam for that situation. I passed comp xe262ah cams through smog with a custom tune and it honestly passed by a good margin. There are so many different types and sizes of stage 1 and 2 cams. What one manufacture calls a stage 1 might be almost the same duration and overlap specs as anothers stage 2. You need to learn more about cams to trully understand what is happening as opposed to just stages.... Its generally though that stage 1 cams will have more bottom end hp but less top and than a stage 2 cam but much of this depends on the actual cam, installed ICL and tune. I will say I LOVED my xe262ah cams. They picked up hp everywhere and about 25rwhp peak. They werent super radical but they did have a nice pick up in power with a stock type powerband and shift points.
__________________
99 Mustang GT 446rwhp, Vortech Aftercooled, Killer Chiller @12lbs, HPX, 3.73s, MGW, Battery Relocation, Intercooler Tank Relocated, CF DF clutch, Steeda Quick Release Quadrant, 75mm TB, Ported C&L Plenum, Stock PI Cams Advance 4 degrees, Pro Chamber |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
Cam choice in order
#1 CMS Stage II N/A #2 Hitech Stage II #3 Comp Cams 262 All with new springs
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
03 gt
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 112
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Enthusiast
'02 VERT
13.08@106.11
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 646
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I have the cms stage 2 and i just tore my car apart last week and only had 1 piston that slapped a valve but that's because It was burned and got hung up .... Degreeing a cam is just to see if it's straight up to spec I've done my cams and the comp cams and have had no problems with ptv numerous times ...
And I never mark my chain before I take it off Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
__________________
CMS STAGE II FRPP 4.10s LTS, O/R H, FLOWMASTER WELD ONS EDELBROCK INTAKE MHS 6061 ELBOW NX PLATE 100 SHOT SCT X3 TUNED BY JOE MANSFIELD AT ABOVE AND BEYOND PERFORMANCE |
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Im looking for bolt-on cam's as well, been searching for quite sometime but I read different things at every different forum Now I understood the following: - The PTV issues can be bypassed by a good timing, - Stage II HiTech's are bolt-on's (No need for new pistons and springs and retainers and stuff) and will throw you close to the 300rwhp range - Comp Cam 270's are also bolt-on's but 278 aren't - Cam's with rough Idling will usually lose torque but gain HP (race cam's i guess) - CMS stage 2's are mostly recommended by everyone but I don't know their gains... I feel they're less than HiTech's (from what I've seen till now) - Usually with Stage 3's or 4's you need heads/ported heads and piston/timing works (not so Bolt-on) - Some people re-grind Stage 1's for more gain but I have no idea how hard/worthy is that - Im looking for a bolt-on Cams which will boost my power band everywhere equally, torque is important as this 4.6 isn't a dragster 12,000 rpm screamer! so I guess CMS stage 2's or HiTech Stage's are recommended (still needs to search)
__________________
Dark Shadow Gray 1 mod or 2 ![]() Thanks to Sarah for the Sig!! ![]() http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-35708/ MM DSG Crew Member#3 |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,391
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I wouldnt knock the xe262ah cams that much. They may not make as much peak HP as the CMS cams but they do make a very nice broad HP improvement. If your not sure which was your build may go in the future then those are your cams. They're ground on a wide enough lob sep, more exhaust duration for better cylinder blow down that they will work well N/A, on the bottle or with a blower. I ran a 125kit and picked up 155rwhp when using those cams.
__________________
99 Mustang GT 446rwhp, Vortech Aftercooled, Killer Chiller @12lbs, HPX, 3.73s, MGW, Battery Relocation, Intercooler Tank Relocated, CF DF clutch, Steeda Quick Release Quadrant, 75mm TB, Ported C&L Plenum, Stock PI Cams Advance 4 degrees, Pro Chamber |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
Not knocking them, there are a bunch of cams for the 2V and these are the only 3 i would put in one N/A. CMS has the best gains all around, the Hitech's usually have more PEAK HP but less WTQ and not as good across the board as the CMS, the Comp cams are good all around but just not as high of gains as the CMS. I would not get a cam based off of what they make PEAK HP wise.
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Regular
03 gt
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 112
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Looks loke im going with cms stage 2 at this point. What rpm's can you take them to?
Also if i get trickflow heads can i run stage 3 and 4 cams? |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
I shift at 6,700rpms at the track, iv held it on the rev limiter bouncing around 7K more than once and it runs fine.
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,391
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
LOL wow. Built ford tuff. But when it breaks we'll say found on road dead. From a hero to a zero just like that lol.
__________________
99 Mustang GT 446rwhp, Vortech Aftercooled, Killer Chiller @12lbs, HPX, 3.73s, MGW, Battery Relocation, Intercooler Tank Relocated, CF DF clutch, Steeda Quick Release Quadrant, 75mm TB, Ported C&L Plenum, Stock PI Cams Advance 4 degrees, Pro Chamber |
|
|
|
#31 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
F8TL shifts his @ about the same
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,391
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I wouldnt run anything from Hitech. Garbage in my opinion. Hitech is the worst about claiming their cams fit perfect, no degree needed, no springs, more like no common sense and no motor for the buyer after the valve smacks a piston. All cams should be degreed. Do a google search for all the cams you listed and all the types you find out about. Search terms like MHS cams dyno, "" cams dyno, "" cams review, install, hp gain...... google everything. You will probably figure out exactly what YOU want. Everyone here including myself is going to tell you to buy what THEY like.
__________________
99 Mustang GT 446rwhp, Vortech Aftercooled, Killer Chiller @12lbs, HPX, 3.73s, MGW, Battery Relocation, Intercooler Tank Relocated, CF DF clutch, Steeda Quick Release Quadrant, 75mm TB, Ported C&L Plenum, Stock PI Cams Advance 4 degrees, Pro Chamber |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RGV, Texas
Posts: 1,390
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
![]() Stock w/Flowmasters
Last edited by ShapeShifter; November 6th, 2011 at 12:35 PM. |
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
as for the cams, they make a good product and they don't need valve springs. been running mine for 2 years now with factory springs.
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Help w/ NA cams
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| changing mach1 intake cams with 96-01 cobra cams?? | blue03mach1 | 4V / SVT | 19 | November 11th, 2009 02:11 PM |
| lunati cams vs. houston perf. vs. comp cams | mylilboostedpony | 99-04 | 0 | September 12th, 2009 06:05 PM |
| cams cams cams help me pick some cams | tlazyhpony | 2005 - 2010 | 13 | September 4th, 2009 02:27 AM |