Researching Vortech Kits
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 99-04

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old November 9th, 2011, 01:11 PM   #1
Enthusiast
 
IsaidWOT's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 806
IsaidWOT is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Researching Vortech Kits


I have gears installed, so I'm not looking for a ton of low end power. Been checking out Vortech kits. Summit Racing has the V-1 kit for $3,014.95. This is a good price from what I've seen.

American Muscles' kit is the V-3 though. Should I hit up that one instead? Is there much of a difference for an additional $700? It says it's self lubricating, whereas I'm assuming the V-1 isn't.

Just trying to get all my ducks in a row.

Thanks!
__________________
2002 Mustang GT | Short Throw Shifter | CAI | 3.73 Gears | Exedy Mach 400 Clutch

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old November 9th, 2011, 01:21 PM   #2
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
T-Lee. 30's Avatar
 
03 gt, 96 tbird, 05bv gxp
Faster than trolls!
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: United States!
Posts: 5,275
T-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to T-Lee. 30
Default

I have the v1 s trim kit and love it as far as self lubricated vs the oil tapped units like the v1 and v2 they tap into the oil pan so the suck from a supply of 6qts or however many qts you put into your car and its all cycled through the filter since its your engine oil. the self contaned just has that few ounces of oil in it that just stays in the head unit no oil filter, oil cooler or a deep supply of cycling oil coming from the pan and when you change your motor oil the unit also gets fresh oil along with it. there is a member on here that was able to get over 600rwhp with a v1 strim and blower cams with the supporting fuel mods. So its a great blower for the price and being 500-600rwhp capable is plenty for the streets. I have 3.73 gears and an auto with my v1 s trim its not that bad on gas either I just drove from Killeen tx to Tifton Ga and averaged 23mpg highway cruizing between 75-90 most of the way with luggage and a 15" sub in the trunk.. I only put down 339 rwhp/359 rwtq on the dyno @4-5psi I had a bad belt tensioner though it was my factory old one so I went to a parts store and picked up an aftermarket tensioner for like $45 and now it goes from 7-9 psi but it hasnt been back on the dyno but with the extra 2-4 psi its obviously more than 339rwhp/359rwtq now. all through an auto with a catted x and 10 series flows. my base dyno before the blower was put on was 233rwhp 266 rwtq so 106 hp increase/ 93 ft lbs increase with a crappy tensioner.
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet

Last edited by T-Lee. 30; November 9th, 2011 at 01:29 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 06:54 PM   #3
Authorized Vendor
 
AMChrisYoung's Avatar
 
1987 Mustang LX 5.0
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Malvern, PA
Posts: 626
AMChrisYoung will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by IsaidWOT View Post
I have gears installed, so I'm not looking for a ton of low end power. Been checking out Vortech kits. Summit Racing has the V-1 kit for $3,014.95. This is a good price from what I've seen.

American Muscles' kit is the V-3 though. Should I hit up that one instead? Is there much of a difference for an additional $700? It says it's self lubricating, whereas I'm assuming the V-1 isn't.

Just trying to get all my ducks in a row.

Thanks!
That's a great question, OP!

The V-3 kit is a great improvement over the V-1s and 2s and a lot of this has to due with the self-contained lubricating system. This saves A TON of headaches in terms of having to tap your oil pan. That doesn't sound like a huge deal, but when you consider that the engine has to be lifted from it's mounts to remove the oil pan, that is a couple hours labor at least. You also then have to trust the quality of work of the person drilling/tapping/welding the bung in place in the oil-pan AND you have to get the required lines/fittings necessary to use the new bung in the oil-pan.

Speaking from experience, the V-3 kit is just a cleaner/easier installation and in the long-run is definitely a worthwhile upgrade.

Furthermore, the head-units(supercharger impeller/impeller housings) are all the same size and flow the same amount of boost through all three models, so you will not see a "performance" improvement between them. They will all make the same power, it just comes down to how easy you want the install to be.

Good luck!

I hope this helps!

Please let me know if you have any questions in the future!
__________________
Chris Young | AmericanMuscle.com
Toll Free: 866.727.1266 | M-F 9AM-9PM EST | Sat 10AM-4PM EST
Bama Hotline: 888.226.9764 | M-F 9AM-5:30PM EST | Sat 10AM-4PM EST
GET UP TO $200 TOWARDS YOUR NEXT PURCHASE FROM AM!
Free Same-Day Shipping!
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 06:59 PM   #4
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
stal94gt's Avatar
 
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
stal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

All si models flow the same but the v1 head units have a lower step ratio so the sc will make less boost per pulley. The v3 si is by far my favorite entry level sc and not running motor oil threw it is a good thing. It keeps all the engine contaminates out. Also a v3 si tuner kit can be had for 2800 off summit.
__________________

bone stock from the factory!
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 07:01 PM   #5
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 63
03fastgt is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Sorry to butt in here, but Rockwell29, which member is making 600HP on the v1? I'd like to see what his set up is like. Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 07:05 PM   #6
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
stal94gt's Avatar
 
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
stal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 03fastgt View Post
Sorry to butt in here, but Rockwell29, which member is making 600HP on the v1? I'd like to see what his set up is like. Thanks
Jivepepper spun a v1 s trim with heads cam and a mmr 900 to break 600a but it was over spun quite a bit. Now he runs a t trim.
__________________

bone stock from the factory!
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 07:10 PM   #7
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
stal94gt's Avatar
 
2003 mustang v6 ;)
slow
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: eglin afb florida
Posts: 10,197
stal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud ofstal94gt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Btw I ran a v3 si trim with ported heads, STOCK cams, and a mmr 900 with a stock lower and a rr3.0 pulley and made mid 500's not over spinning my v3. The v3 is one of the few perfectly matched blowers for a modular cause with the stock 3.6 pulley it makes exactly 10# on a stock motor non ic. Which means it can be used from mild to wild
__________________

bone stock from the factory!
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 07:45 PM   #8
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
T-Lee. 30's Avatar
 
03 gt, 96 tbird, 05bv gxp
Faster than trolls!
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: United States!
Posts: 5,275
T-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to T-Lee. 30
Default

Originally Posted by 03fastgt View Post
Sorry to butt in here, but Rockwell29, which member is making 600HP on the v1? I'd like to see what his set up is like. Thanks
Stal just answered it! Jivepepper check post #43 in this link what will it make? dyno guesses :) there is another member on here making 517rwhp on a v2 with a stock longblock and blower cams @11psi. Bullitt 5566
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet

Last edited by T-Lee. 30; November 9th, 2011 at 08:21 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 09:38 PM   #9
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
blownstang's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
blownstang has a spectacular aura aboutblownstang has a spectacular aura aboutblownstang has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by AMChrisYoung View Post
That's a great question, OP!

The V-3 kit is a great improvement over the V-1s and 2s and a lot of this has to due with the self-contained lubricating system. This saves A TON of headaches in terms of having to tap your oil pan. That doesn't sound like a huge deal, but when you consider that the engine has to be lifted from it's mounts to remove the oil pan, that is a couple hours labor at least. You also then have to trust the quality of work of the person drilling/tapping/welding the bung in place in the oil-pan AND you have to get the required lines/fittings necessary to use the new bung in the oil-pan.
Ummm...you definitely dont have to lift the engine or remove the oil pan. My complete V1 kit install cost $350.
__________________

2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd
Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S
N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60'
Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60'
Intercooled: 362/370
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 09:54 PM   #10
Enthusiast
 
IsaidWOT's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 806
IsaidWOT is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

So the tuner kit just doesn't include the tune, injectors, fuel pump and stuff. Instead of going that route, I'd probably do the sticky for the affordable supercharger. I dunno, it's probably a year out yet since I just had to pay another $1,300 for tuition this week.
__________________
2002 Mustang GT | Short Throw Shifter | CAI | 3.73 Gears | Exedy Mach 400 Clutch

  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 09:59 PM   #11
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
T-Lee. 30's Avatar
 
03 gt, 96 tbird, 05bv gxp
Faster than trolls!
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: United States!
Posts: 5,275
T-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to T-Lee. 30
Default

you can always check out the classifieds on here if you dont want to pay the price for the brand new kits. The kit i picked up is the same one you listed for $3014 but i found mine on craigslist out in houston for $2400 brand new and complete still in the box wrapped up. Just do a bit of weekly hunting close to the time you're planning on picking one up.
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
  Reply With Quote
Old November 9th, 2011, 11:48 PM   #12
Regular
 
02gtvortech's Avatar
 
2002 mustang gt
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LONG ISLAND
Posts: 265
02gtvortech is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

i bought that same kit from summit and installed it myself. i love the kit and it works great its no big deal to tap the oil pan. just make sure you get a dyno tune because the tune they put on my computer was running rich and making like 50 less hosepower. i have had that kit on my car for almost two years and never had any problems yet. you all so get a 3 year warrenty from vortech with that kit.
__________________
324RWHP 323RWHP 8.1 psi. BOOST
  Reply With Quote
Old November 10th, 2011, 08:51 AM   #13
Regular
 
joswo1980's Avatar
 
2001 mustang gt
no clue
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: troy ny
Posts: 488
joswo1980 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by AMChrisYoung View Post
That's a great question, OP!

The V-3 kit is a great improvement over the V-1s and 2s and a lot of this has to due with the self-contained lubricating system. This saves A TON of headaches in terms of having to tap your oil pan. That doesn't sound like a huge deal, but when you consider that the engine has to be lifted from it's mounts to remove the oil pan, that is a couple hours labor at least. You also then have to trust the quality of work of the person drilling/tapping/welding the bung in place in the oil-pan AND you have to get the required lines/fittings necessary to use the new bung in the oil-pan.

Speaking from experience, the V-3 kit is just a cleaner/easier installation and in the long-run is definitely a worthwhile upgrade.

Furthermore, the head-units(supercharger impeller/impeller housings) are all the same size and flow the same amount of boost through all three models, so you will not see a "performance" improvement between them. They will all make the same power, it just comes down to how easy you want the install to be.

Good luck!

I hope this helps!

Please let me know if you have any questions in the future!
False! U don't have to take off oil pan, nor weld, the adapter is threaded and sits above the oil table its just a drain and all required hoses and fitting come with kit, but a v3 is diffently better than the 2 other models
__________________
zex blackout 125 shot,bbk 78mm tb,bbk CAI, flowmaster accel supercoils, diablo tuner. New setup in works VORTECH V2 SQ BOLTED ONTO A MMR 750
  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 08:44 AM   #14
Enthusiast
 
IsaidWOT's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 806
IsaidWOT is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

One more question for you guys, I'll probably go with the V3 when I get the money. What octane fuel do you use with your S/C?
__________________
2002 Mustang GT | Short Throw Shifter | CAI | 3.73 Gears | Exedy Mach 400 Clutch

  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 11:46 AM   #15
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
T-Lee. 30's Avatar
 
03 gt, 96 tbird, 05bv gxp
Faster than trolls!
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: United States!
Posts: 5,275
T-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really niceT-Lee. 30 is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to T-Lee. 30
Default

93!!!!!! or the highest in your area.
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 01:09 PM   #16
Enthusiast
 
IsaidWOT's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 806
IsaidWOT is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Okay, yeah we have 91-93 here.
__________________
2002 Mustang GT | Short Throw Shifter | CAI | 3.73 Gears | Exedy Mach 400 Clutch

  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 04:53 PM   #17
Enthusiast
 
IsaidWOT's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 806
IsaidWOT is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Okay, call me a woman, but I've changed my mind. I'm going to go Kenne Bell. After looking at both extensively I'll probably go with a Non IC kit because my power requirements aren't that great. I want more than 300rwhp, but less than 400rwhp. Wife will never let me do much beyond.

With that said, the KB just has the look and sound that I'm wanting. I won't need it intercooled because I don't want higher output than about the 340-360 it'll give me.
__________________
2002 Mustang GT | Short Throw Shifter | CAI | 3.73 Gears | Exedy Mach 400 Clutch

  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 05:07 PM   #18
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
jivepepper's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under a sombrero
Posts: 5,025
jivepepper is just really nicejivepepper is just really nicejivepepper is just really nicejivepepper is just really nice
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by joswo1980 View Post
False! U don't have to take off oil pan, nor weld, the adapter is threaded and sits above the oil table its just a drain and all required hoses and fitting come with kit, but a v3 is diffently better than the 2 other models
I wouldn't say the oil system is better just more convenient and user friendly.

I prefer a Sc the use an external oil supply. They are more durable. That's why all race centrfuge blowers and turbos still tap into an external oil supply. Now the improved impeller design it why it's an improvement.

Originally Posted by IsaidWOT View Post
Okay, call me a woman, but I've changed my mind. I'm going to go Kenne Bell. After looking at both extensively I'll probably go with a Non IC kit because my power requirements aren't that great. I want more than 300rwhp, but less than 400rwhp. Wife will never let me do much beyond.

With that said, the KB just has the look and sound that I'm wanting. I won't need it intercooled because I don't want higher output than about the 340-360 it'll give me.
That's what I said 8 years ago when I first bought my SC lol.
__________________
665/541 WHP/WTQ 4.6L SOHC 2V ON 93 OCTANE PUMP GAS.
NO METH INJ., NO E85, NO RACE GAS, N2O BABY BOTTLES!
TRAP=POWER: 11.01 @135, IN SUMMER HEAT, 1350' TRACK, 315/35/17 DR'S

  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 06:33 PM   #19
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
blownstang's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,551
blownstang has a spectacular aura aboutblownstang has a spectacular aura aboutblownstang has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

haha yup. You'll get bored with 350rwhp real fast. The KB may hold you over for a while because of the instant boost so it will feel fast, but in a month or two you are going to want to up the boost. In no time you will be putting an intercooled kit on it.
__________________

2003 DSG Mustang GT 5spd
Full Bolt On's, Suspension, Built Rear, V1 S
N/A: 266/300, 3,550lbs, 13.44 @ 100.5 1.77 60'
Non-intercooled: 356/371, 3,575lbs, 12.81 @ 110.47 1.86 60'
Intercooled: 362/370
  Reply With Quote
Old November 11th, 2011, 08:01 PM   #20
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,391
Nitmare67 is a jewel in the roughNitmare67 is a jewel in the roughNitmare67 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I run the V3SI and wouldnt have it any other way. Best entry level blower on the market by far.
__________________
99 Mustang GT 446rwhp, Vortech Aftercooled, Killer Chiller @12lbs, HPX, 3.73s, MGW, Battery Relocation, Intercooler Tank Relocated, CF DF clutch, Steeda Quick Release Quadrant, 75mm TB, Ported C&L Plenum, Stock PI Cams Advance 4 degrees, Pro Chamber
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Researching Vortech Kits
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vortech V3: alternative A/W intercoolers to Vortech system? saxmanJJ 99-04 5 November 3rd, 2011 02:58 PM
vortech supercharger kits momogt 99-04 13 June 28th, 2009 04:19 PM
So I'm researching on what gears to get. Huxley 99-04 39 February 27th, 2009 08:00 PM
how are the jms vortech supercharger kits??? lilmarc1988 99-04 3 March 2nd, 2008 08:53 AM
Vortech kits without a tuner??? catchtheroadrunner General Tech 4 October 17th, 2007 07:17 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.