| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Need your opinion on my next mod!
Like the title states, I want to get some opinions on what mod to throw at the stang next. I am returning off deployment, and ive put away a good chunk of change, and I have about 2k set aside for the car. My current setup is:
Engine/Fuel: Stock Bottom end P1sc Intercooled VMP MAF Stage 2 Patriot heads 272/272 comp cam 42lb Injectors with msd COP's Accufab TB with 1/2'' Spacer Dual svt pumps with KB BAP BBK LT's into BBK x-pipe Trans/rear/suspension: Stock trans stage 3+ spec clutch Built 8.8 Rear end Lowered 2'' front and 1.5'' rear Tokiko d-spec adjustable shocks AM LCA's Accessories: Already got a decent set of rims/tires 245 up front/315 out back Stock brakes/rotors Short throw with line lock The interior is all OEM still, minus 3 guage pillar, and shifter. So, any suggestions?!
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
wiggety wiggety whack!
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,176
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Subframe connectors? Also I'd go braided brake hoses all 4 corners.
3 hookers for good weight distribution? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I like boobs!!!
2000 GT convertible
dunno
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Brooklet, GA
Posts: 2,827
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Nooo, you need Douche' for the hookers!!!
And +10 on the SFC's
__________________
Last time you voted to prove you aren't racist. This time prove you're not an IDIOT!!! ![]() My Garage--->http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-46919/ |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Definitely going to go with SFC's,AM had some decent SFC's, but that's only like 200$ max. Ive got 1800 left over :-D
Thanks for the input guys!
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
12.41@114
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 1,320
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I agree with the SBF's and throw some nice adjustable uppers and lowers on it.
For the lowers if your car is straight line oriented I would recommend JR Mega Bites.
__________________
MM FOBRA CLUB CO-FOUNDER
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
wiggety wiggety whack!
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,176
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I've never heard of the JR mega bites, do you have a link? google isn't helping me find them.
An aftermarket K-member would save you some weight up front, you could do coil overs and tubular A-arms at the same time. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
![]() And how hard would be doing K-member and A-arms?
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
and I thought the K-member brought my front wheels forward a couple of inches? Is this true? I dont really want to do that..
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
wiggety wiggety whack!
2004 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,176
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Q.What are the benefits of switching to a coil-over front suspension? A. Better handling and better ride quality! When the spring is in the stock location on the control arm, the minimum spring rate for performance handling is 700 lbs/in. Better handling can be had with higher spring rates, but ride quality begins to suffer with rates over 850 lbs/in. A coil-over kit allows the use of wheel rates that are much higher than those obtained with an 850 lbs/in spring in the stock location. This will dramatically reduce body roll and brake dive. Other benefits include easily adjustable ride height, the ability to fine tune corner weights, ease of bumpsteer measurement, less weight, and a wide selection of available spring rates. Here's a write-up from a member here who did a k-member swap: ******zincs k member install tons of pics!!***** |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Easley, SC
Posts: 213
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Forged short block?
__________________
2002 Mustang GT- built C head 4V swap in progress ![]() FOBRA CLUB MEMBER #7 |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
12.41@114
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 1,320
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
HPM MEGA BITE JR REAR LOWER CONTROL ARMS , NASCAR Gifts and More at Guaranteed Low Prices White’s Pit Stop
__________________
MM FOBRA CLUB CO-FOUNDER
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
12.41@114
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 1,320
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Coil overs are better with weight transfer then having the standard location of the spring. Plus have total adjustability when combined with the correct strut/shock. You can adjust ride hieght and how hard/soft everything is. IMO I would not do the tubular K unless you are planning long tubes or a turbo setup. The gain just isn't that much. I am also not a fan of tubular a-arms on street car.
__________________
MM FOBRA CLUB CO-FOUNDER
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I already have BBK Longtubes on there, are they going to get in the way of anything?
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
12.41@114
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 1,320
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
You would just have more room with the tube k-member and the longtubes. If the longtubes are already one, I would skip the k-member and do all suspension.
No reason in having all that power if you can't get it to the ground and hooking.
__________________
MM FOBRA CLUB CO-FOUNDER
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
1999 Mustang GT Auto
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 129
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
11.56@119.24
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 159
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Just ordered steeda full length sub frame connectors, hopefully worth it! Bought them off american muscle and literally 15 minutes later they were shipped. haha
__________________
Just your average '02 GT Stock bottom end Slower than yours 459rwhp/415tq |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
forged shortblock for sure. put the 1800 on as a downpayment for an mmr900 or so and then you wont have to worry about that time bomb of a bottom end. then next time you get some cash, throw that p1 away step up to a d1 and bingo make 500+
__________________
![]() '00 GT, hp 292's, full bolt ons, built/stalled auto, 4.10's, 150 shot-new times to come. '95 GT, 347, tko, etc-11.8@116-sold. ![]() WTT-my mildly built 4r70 for t56/tko. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Need your opinion on my next mod!
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| need an opinion. | Mlx50man | 5.0 Mustangs | 14 | March 14th, 2011 08:24 AM |
| What's every ones opinion on MMR ???? | Mustang46 | 99-04 | 43 | June 28th, 2010 03:24 PM |
| Gun opinion | dude496 | The Clubhouse | 89 | April 16th, 2010 06:24 PM |
| i want ur opinion | 01sta1k3r | 99-04 | 4 | January 27th, 2008 12:34 PM |
| Need help/opinion!!! | 04Pony | 99-04 | 0 | January 6th, 2008 09:51 PM |