| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
1999 Mustang GT Auto
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 129
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
NA cost????$$$$$$
I'm sure there are others, like myself, who are up in the air whether to go NA or SC. Since there was a thread started to list parts/costs for members SC setups I thought doing the same thing for those members that went the NA path to list the same type of information. Would provide a good cross reference from a $$ perspective for those of us standing at the cross roads!!!
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,311
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
The maximum horsepower you can attain by rebuilding the short-block with high compression pistons, adding $3000 trick flow head and cams, etc. is around 330-350 rwhp.
A simple non-intercooled supercharger costing $2500-$3500 will get you there. People build na motor because it is their dream, not because it is cost effective.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 mustang gt
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,896
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
If you want serious NA power you'll want a stroker in my opinion with good heads and cams, I like the idea of a stroker 5.0
__________________
Rock stock
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 mustang gt
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,896
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
There is a guy on here with a 5.0 stoker making 398
__________________
Rock stock
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MM Fanatic
2004 Mustang
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 4,336
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
Go Turbo
__________________
![]() 305/333 WHP/WTQ with CMS Stage II cams 440/552 WHP/WTQ on Spray 7.86 @ 89.1mph, 1.61 60 foot N/A 7.20 @ 98.8MPH 1.55 60 foot on spray Stock Longblock with Cams |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 gt
5.4 32v on the way
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 4,191
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
I am probably going to have ~12-15k invested into an NA mod motor to likely end up somewhere at the bottom end of 500-600hp. You could easily do a turbo/supercharged setup to make that kind of power or more for half the price. If I were you I wouldn't even try to compare the two with a price, the price to do it NA is just an obstacle for the foolish who are too stubborn to go with boost.
__________________
2003 Mustang gt - usual mods - slowly working on 5.4 swap 2004 srt4 - Stock DD/winter beater Click here for your tuning needs Before asking a gearing related question click THIS link and enjoy all your saved time. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,539
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
On3's new FF Turbo Kit list $2100-2200 I believe, for $3000-3200 you can get everything you need. Their test car was bone-stock except for Flowmasters and made 441 whp through a 5-speed @ 10 psi. Great starter setup.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 gt
5.4 32v on the way
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 4,191
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
+1 to the forward facing turbo idea, good start that gives you plenty of room to grow. Just throw in a decent bottom end and make enough power for 2 cars.
__________________
2003 Mustang gt - usual mods - slowly working on 5.4 swap 2004 srt4 - Stock DD/winter beater Click here for your tuning needs Before asking a gearing related question click THIS link and enjoy all your saved time. |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
03 V1 S trim @5psi 339/359 3:73's Iraq and Afghanistan War Vet 4 deployments from 01-08.My Wife is also a War Vet
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1999 GT 35th LE
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 1,428
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'm one of those stubborn guys that refuses to go with boost, I prefer my nitrous when I want more power.
I currently have spent about $10,000 on my new NA engine that will be spinning to 7500 RPM and it's not even complete yet. But that is buying every part, bolts, and sensors new. I have done a good amount of shopping around for the best price and finding some deals on new parts that were purchased but never installed. If you go on Corral.net, you can find some good deals on the Trick Flow heads and used or new superchargers and turbo kits.
__________________
![]() Drive it like you stole it |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pauline SC
Posts: 265
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I just started on my na build. My heads are warped and there is like a two inch chunk missing on the block underneath the intake manifold from the cheap previous owner. More than likely I'll get the 4.75 MMR Shortblock and slap the Trick Flow Stage Two Top End Kit on it. I have a good bit of na parts sitting in my room too, and yes I will be spending too much for the HP gains, but its something different.
I have had a supercharged and turbo car, so now I want a built motor and may spray. Like mentioned, you can easily spend less and make more power if you go other ways, but its up to you and your budget.
__________________
"Never run, never hide, never back down." |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT
11.463@121.50
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE PA
Posts: 1,644
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
N/A will cost more no doubt for the same amt of hp.
Advantages to N/A is it is alot simpler and lighter, and you don't have to worry as much about blowing up the motor (vs. boosted). Those Boss 5.0 modular based 4v motors with a stroker crank (5.3 liters) and trickflow heads make north of 400rwhp. On another note, it is easier to stay emissions compliant with a supercharger than trying to make big power N/A.
__________________
MM Bracket Racing Crew Member #5 |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,311
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
A supercharger running 10 psi with cams will get you 428 rwhp on an otherwise stock motor. A lot of people are buying used kits then add cams and they might have $5,000 at most in their motors.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
1999 Mustang GT Auto
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 129
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I definitely want new cams. I'll be honest, I really enjoy that idle rumble. So if I want somewhere around 350 rwhp going SC is still the most cost effective route? Though I guess what I'm reading here is that for the same $$$ amount, to get to that rwhp, a SC will provide even more hp.
So if I went SC and added new cams that's all I would need to do to the stock engine? Thought I would also need new plenum, TB, and CAI.? |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
its gonna cost, but If you want a real good base for a n/a engine you will need to big bore the block and stroke it, which takes it to the 5.3 range. You will want 11:1 compression might be able to get away with a little more, but depends on the gas in your area. You will want, no you will NEED a custom set of cams, an Edlebrock intake, and all the other bolt ons. You will need to spin it to make the power. 2v or 4v will determine what your final hp numbers are. But be prepared to spend 15k easily to do what I said above
__________________
Just a truck 5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock The "search" button, its not just for porn piecing together the next project faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 gt
5.4 32v on the way
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 4,191
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
__________________
2003 Mustang gt - usual mods - slowly working on 5.4 swap 2004 srt4 - Stock DD/winter beater Click here for your tuning needs Before asking a gearing related question click THIS link and enjoy all your saved time. |
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
__________________
built motor,trickflow heads,logan intake,80mm comp turbo on the way..
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
if you go just a 20 over motor, light h beam rods, good pistons,stock crank prepped, trickflow heads, mhs stage 3 tf na cams, a decent intake with the compression around 11:7 its an easy combo for 350+
__________________
built motor,trickflow heads,logan intake,80mm comp turbo on the way..
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Enthusiast
2001 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 722
![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
400HP has been made on a raised compression (pump gas) 5.4 4v with Navigator Heads, Custom Cams, and the aussie boss intake
__________________
01 GT Vert - Triple Black - 2v 5.4 270/340 00 Lightning - Triple Black - 2v SC 5.4 400/500 Brand New Tubular UCA and LCA set for sale PM me Slightly Used 05-09 Halo Headlights for sale PM me
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: NA cost????$$$$$$
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What should it cost? | Huck | 2005 - 2010 | 21 | August 19th, 2011 10:52 AM |
| How much will it cost!! | LAStang1234 | V6 Mustangs | 5 | April 11th, 2010 11:51 AM |
| How much would it cost? | mustang fanatic | 2005 - 2010 | 15 | May 22nd, 2008 12:10 AM |
| Cost of 331 | 1BADSTANG | 5.0 Mustangs | 14 | March 25th, 2008 04:18 PM |
| Cost? | D-Brow | General Tech | 4 | August 30th, 2007 10:28 PM |