| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Kenne bell vs. centrifugal vs. Turbo in the 99-04 Forum. Does anybody have any opinions on these. I have been pondering for a while what ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
Kenne bell vs. centrifugal vs. Turbo
Does anybody have any opinions on these. I have been pondering for a while what to do. Originally I wanted to get a procharger, then was intrigued by the Twin Turbos, now I'm thinking about a Kenne bell twin screw.
What I've considered: Procharger, Vortech, etc.: Great horsepower, but can lag almost as much as a turbo at times. Seemingly limited boost (correct me if I'm wrong). Less expensive method. Turbos: Again great performance, but as stated above are known for lagging (gotta stay on that throttle), especially at idle, but insane after they wind up. Very difficult and expensive installations. Kenne bell: Great overall performers, variable boost ranges, expensive but installation is easier compared to other methods. Oh and immediate exponential power throughout powerband. Don't get me wrong...all three are great performers, but based on some of the numbers I've seen I think the Kenne bell is the best option. I think I will go with the 2.6l model (for 1999-2004 gt's 9-26psi). Anyone else want to comment or have opposing views Id really like to hear them.
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
|
hope you have a built motor if you are gonna use the 2.6 what are your plans with the car? if its mostly a street car the kenne bell is cool cause its instant boost. i like the procharger or centrifigal style because the power comes on gradual which makes it easier to launch in my opinion. and it pulls like hell above 3k rpms. but if you just plan on messing around on the streets the kenne bell will prolly make you happier. turbo is going to make the most power but like you said its more expensive.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lynnwood, Washington
Posts: 1,864
|
i have the 2.1 9psi and its great! ill probably do the pulley swap for the 14 psi . Was at 400+ horses with 9 psi
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
I don't have a built (forged) motor yet...but plan to soon. I plan on using the car on the strip and on weekends.
What makes you say that Kenne bells are meant for messing around on the streets? The particular application that I inquired to (2.6l) has a 850+ hp potential if it is set up right: forged rotating assemblies, cams, heads, etc. I've seen some vids, one of them was a Kenne bell GT taking on a turbocharged car and it definately wasn't messing around at all. How has the procharger worked out for you as far as performance, etc. ???
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
|
i just meant by messing around that if you just plan on a lot of street driving and wanted to play with other cars on the street its a fun blower cause of the instant power. if you just wanted to put a blower on it and be done and do nothing else to the car i like the kennebell. i just drive my car once and a while and at the track whenever i can and i love the procharger for that. it pulls hard all the way to redline. i love the procharger, the only thing i would say if you are going witha procharger get the d series.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lynnwood, Washington
Posts: 1,864
|
Was intercooled and Is about 5k for just the kit (without tax or shipping). I got the 90mm mass air and cold air intake though too. Which was about 600 more i think...
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1990 GT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: dalzell, south carolina
Posts: 1,436
|
its gonna depend on your engine set up how much boost you get. for the p series i am about maxed out on boost. when i upgrade to the d series with the same size pulley i will be running about 18-19 pounds.
__________________
1990 5.0 getting all fixed up for next season 2004 mustang gt 520rwhp, 491 trq sold
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Port, NC
Posts: 717
|
I've also got the 2.1L KB @ 9psi. It is intercooled.
I love thet thing, it made the car a absolute blast to drive. I'm also planning on uping the boost on mine to 14psi after a forge the block, and install some heads and cams. My goal is to be over 600 rwhp witch I think is very possible. Are you planning on doing the work yourself or having a shop install it? And like RyanGT said, the kit was 5k, the 90mm MAF and CAI was an extra 600, total with shipping to hawaii cost my 6k.
__________________
Mustangless atm 2006 2500 HD Diesel. Built allison trans and other goodies
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT Conv.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgewater, FL
Posts: 1,758
|
you'd rather go kb than twin turbo'd are you crazy? Twin Turbos have a lot more potential
__________________
![]() 2004 GT Boosted by Vortech |
|
|
#12 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 8,987
|
you can limit the lag with turbos with t4 headunits, ceramic coated headers and piping, and turbo wrap. centrifugals have very little lag, make good power on the higher rpm's, efficient, and are great for street strip applications. kenne bell is powerful on the bottom end, efficient, but has power drop off in the higher rpm's. if you go with a s/c and a lot of boost you will need to invest into bottom end, head work, and an 8 rib conversion. if a street monster is what you want with a lot of boost, go with a centr. if you want a s/c with a$$ loads of bottom end torque and grunt go with a twin screw. if over all power numbers is all you are after, turbos.
__________________
right now, she is a jackstand warrior if the car was a horse, i would shoot it!!! ![]() project warhorse under construction |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Port, NC
Posts: 717
|
I have the dyno sheet to mine and it hit its peak HP right around 5900 and didn't drop off. The rev limiter is at 6200 and I was in the 360-370hp range from from 5500 up
__________________
Mustangless atm 2006 2500 HD Diesel. Built allison trans and other goodies
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 8,987
|
it also depends on the blower size and how much boost you run through it. if you have for example a 2.6 at 10psi. there shouldnt be any drop off just for the fact the blower is hardly turning. a 2.1 would give a faster 10lbs without dropping off, but power would start to level out at the top. this theory would be better looked at a terminator with an eaton and a terminator with a kenne. same rule, not trying to start a riot or opening a can of worms. the twin screws are the same way, but the drop off isnt anywhere near as bad.
__________________
right now, she is a jackstand warrior if the car was a horse, i would shoot it!!! ![]() project warhorse under construction |
|
|
#15 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Port, NC
Posts: 717
|
I know what your saying. I've just read too many post where people think the roots style and twinscrew style are one in the same.
I'll have to see if mine drops off when I up it to 14 psi. But my build still won't take me past 6,200 rpms so I still might be too low to see a drop off.
__________________
Mustangless atm 2006 2500 HD Diesel. Built allison trans and other goodies
|
|
|
#16 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 8,987
|
that sounds about right, the 2.1 will take power up quiet a ways but will peak somewhere as with all superchargers. my buddy went to school for forced induction and nitrous applications, and we been dealing with this kind of stuff for our builds that we do.
__________________
right now, she is a jackstand warrior if the car was a horse, i would shoot it!!! ![]() project warhorse under construction |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
I plan on doing the work with the help from an experience family mechanic. He's done numerous s/c and turbo systems throughout the years. He really knows his shit. I do to an extent, but experience is always gonna beat general knowledge. Plus, I can get all my stuff done for dirt cheap. btw: Does anybody know why in the hell I have advertisements on my posts???
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
I know that some day I will have another car that I will have Twin turbo charger put in, but for now I going with a supercharger.
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Port, NC
Posts: 717
|
I don't see any advertisements?
How much boost are you planning to run? And something to keep in mind, but you seem to be doing your homework. The 2.6L won't fit under the stock hood, good reason to get something better!
__________________
Mustangless atm 2006 2500 HD Diesel. Built allison trans and other goodies
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 91
|
Hood won't fit??? Thats an easy one that I have already looked into. All I have to do is get a Cobra R hood. Looks badass and is about 20-30lbs lighter than stock. (fiberglass or carbon fiber)
__________________
http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z...076/Pic031.jpg 2003 Mustang GT. Red HOT Bitch! Many mods to come... |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Kenne bell vs. centrifugal vs. Turbo
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| twin turbo or Kenne Bell or vorteck what is better!! | mustangdevil69 | V6 Mustangs | 58 | January 7th, 2008 04:32 AM |
| HP Twin Turbo Kit or Kenne Bell Supercharger??? HELP! | Chris02 | 99-04 | 10 | January 6th, 2008 01:20 PM |
| Gettin a S/C in about a year. A kenne bell or a centrifugal? | mustangmanic | 99-04 | 30 | August 21st, 2007 02:37 PM |
| Kenne Bell, Procharger or turbo | 89fox5.0 | 5.0 Mustangs | 12 | February 15th, 2007 11:11 AM |
| Kenne Bell Supercharger or Hellion Turbo? | Chris02 | 99-04 | 29 | November 20th, 2006 02:37 AM |