![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing more nitrous questions in the 99-04 Forum. im readin 5.0 mustangs and super fords.april 2005 t-zex wet shot. it ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
|
more nitrous questions
im readin 5.0 mustangs and super fords.april 2005 t-zex wet shot. it says their 4.6 had a cold-air kit,pulleys,throttle body and exhaust. (i have upper plenum intake ,3.73 ,diablo,toyo street slicks, plus what that car has.)they tried the 75 ,100 ,and 125, shot on it and dyno it. dyno sheet says the 125 shot added 169lb-ft .is that horse power or torque.also 418torque at 4000rpm 347hp at 5000rpm.(baseline,289torque at 4200rpm ,249hp at 5000rpm)that gain seems like a dream come true for about $700 with purge kit.good deal?
My Point, if im runnin 13.5 now :with this kit and good shiftin what times should i expect. i have a good friend with a neon srt-4 runnin 12.6 I MUST BEET THE NEON.for the love of V-8 rear wheeled powered cars please give lots of feedback.savin now of t-zex. |
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
unstoppable @ speed of light
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knees deep in dat ass
Posts: 2,875
|
Those are pretty close to the gains I got when I put in my nitrous.
With 350 rwhp you should be able to get mid 12's. If you had full suspension and slicks and if you are a good driver you could pull out a 12 flat.
__________________
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7
|
full suspension? please tell me more about this. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
unstoppable @ speed of light
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knees deep in dat ass
Posts: 2,875
|
I'm not too up to date on the suspension stuff... But for starters look into upper and lower control arms, drag shocks and struts, front end kit (as in tubular k-member) for weight savings. And a full sub frame system, not just the bars but the whole shabang. That way when the front of you car starts to rise it will be distributed to the back tires evenly.
__________________
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
Re: more nitrous questions
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 265
|
Re: more nitrous questions
__________________
1985 Mustang GT-Yeah, it's FAST 2006 Black on Black ProCharged Mustang GT-It's the Mrs' 2006 FX4 Superduty Powerstroke-The Toy Hauler |
||
|
|
#7 | |||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 6,014
|
Re: more nitrous questions
__________________
|
|||
|
|
#8 | |||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
Re: more nitrous questions
|
|||
|
|
#9 | ||||
|
MM's Mad Scientist
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,393
|
Re: more nitrous questions
Nitrous amplifies TQ due to highly increased cylinder pressure. That increased cylinder pressure transfers through the pistons and rods, to the crank, through the tranny, and increases rotational force (TQ) on the driveshaft making your car haul much ass. BTW: HP is a derivative of TQ, but the divider is 5250.
__________________
|
||||
|
|
#10 | |||||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
Re: more nitrous questions
I explained the mathematical part of it, not the mechanical. If your car doesn't rev much above 5252, then it's most likely going to gain more TQ then HP because your TQ is always higher then HP below 5252 rpm. If your car revs well above 5252, say 7000+, then you will most likely see a larger gain in HP then TQ, because your HP is always higher then TQ above 5252 rpm. When you gain HP & TQ they are both going to go up the same percent. So, if you gain %25 HP you will also gain 25% TQ. So, if your TQ is higher then your HP, at a specific rpm, you will see larger gains in TQ then HP because they both went up the same percent, and vice versa. |
|||||
|
|
#11 |
|
MM's Mad Scientist
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,393
|
Sorry, but you're still incorrect. Nitrous usage will always always result in more TQ than HP gain.
__________________
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
You know I could be wrong, and I'm not trying to start an argument. I am not too familiar with nitrous, I'm just going off of what I know based on the equation TQ(RPM)/5252=HP. Maybe nitrous power gains work differently then N/A, S/C, & T/C, and if it does, please eplain, but I'm just basing my claim off that equation. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
MM's Mad Scientist
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,393
|
You would still have gained more than 200 ft. lbs. of torque earlier in the RPM band. So, overall, you still would have realized a bigger TQ than HP gain.
__________________
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
I still disagree... check it
http://www.zx-12r.org/Motorcycle_inf...no%20sheet.jpg A dyno using a bike revs over 11,000 before and after nitrous. Gains 64.9 RWHP but only 40.6 RWTQ, and it looks like to me he starts spraying at about 2500 rpm. If your right, and I'm wrong, I sure as hell am not gonna make it easy on you
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1999 Mustang
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,311
|
put nitrous on your car and put her on the dyno, then tell me you gained more HP than TQ... you wont idc what your equations say
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
MM's Mad Scientist
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,393
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
MM's Mad Scientist
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 4,393
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
By the way, they are not MY equations, they are THE equations. HP is calculated from TQ with 5252 as the constant, it is a fact, not something I pulled out of my ass... |
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 6,014
|
__________________
|
||
|
|
#20 | |||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,193
|
|
|||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: more nitrous questions
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| nitrous questions | gtdan | 96-98 | 4 | August 27th, 2007 09:46 PM |
| Nitrous Questions | MustangMatt96GT | 96-98 | 9 | May 23rd, 2007 07:53 PM |
| NITROUS questions | rkloehn | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | April 15th, 2007 11:48 AM |
| Nitrous questions | foxstang | 5.0 Mustangs | 21 | March 17th, 2007 12:10 PM |
| Nitrous questions | foxstang | 5.0 Mustangs | 16 | March 12th, 2007 10:29 PM |