![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Compression ratio w/supercharger in the 99-04 Forum. I am looking at building my engine this winter/spring, and was looking at also ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
Compression ratio w/supercharger
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
what kind of supercharger are you going to run. 9.5 with a centrifugal blower will be perfect, you dont want low compression with them, as for turbo and twin screw though, youll want 8.5-9.0 with them
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
I was planning on a KB. So is 9.5:1 too high with a KB then???
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
yeah youd be better off going with 8.5, a stage 2 head plus a 18-20 cc dish in the pistons should do plenty to get that compression down low enough.
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.582@97.59 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,141
|
not optumal. You could put SVO heads on there that would have a NPI size combustion chamber and get down less than 9.0:1 but that for the heads and intake is like 3 grand by them selfs! You could also just keep the stock stroke with forged rods, crank, and dished pistons that would make it optimal!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
i think you should do the higer compression, with the centri blower, till make more top en power (where you want it) and it will make for a faster car. kb are over rated and are a band aid for low compression. stick with the centri if ya want a faster car.
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
I was planning on getting VT stage 2 heads, crower stage 2 or 3 (haven't decided yet) blower cam, crower springs and retainers (titanium), I was also thinking about crower valves (any recommendations would be nice).
Also what the difference between 44.5mm and 45.5mm (+1mm), and 36mm and 37mm (+1mm)??? Any recommendations on stroker rotating assemblies??? I would prefer billet because it is stronger. Eventually I plan on making a ton a power (700+ rwhp). |
|
|
#8 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
if thats the power your wanting, regular forged parts will be fine. bllet stuff is needed if your wanting over 1000
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
http://www.vtengines.com/store/index...roducts_id=110 http://www.vtengines.com/store/index...roducts_id=111 http://www.vtengines.com/store/index...roducts_id=108 http://www.vtengines.com/store/index...roducts_id=109 |
||
|
|
#11 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.582@97.59 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,141
|
Those are for the size of the valves. And it might help you out with a blower, but they are expensive to gain only 20 HP tops. And well dont buy the crower stuff from VT I orders the titanuium valvesprings and retianers Aug 17, 2007 and have yet to recieve anything. They keep blameing it on crower. But havent offered me a refund or a discount or anything.
And dude im telling you go the centri way!
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
centri si the way, just go with whatever valves come in the head, theyve been researhed and proven to work fine with the combo. i wont ever order form vt again, i had problems when i ordered my heads from them
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
If I get something besides a KB it will be a TT setup. What is an ideal TT compression ratio???
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
8.5-9.0
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
anything with a dish around 15 or bigger, with a bigger head will put you real close to what your wanting. im running a 21cc dish piston with vt stage 2 heads and i am right around 8.5:1
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
Thanks! Now this may be a dumb question but, are blower cams also good for turbos, or not? If not, who makes a good turbo cam???
Another dumb question but, how does having a bigger head lower compression? |
|
|
#18 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.582@97.59 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,141
|
Bigger Combustion chamber in the head lowers compression. There is more space to combust in.
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#19 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,908
|
a blower cam isnc ompletely different form a turbo cam, i would contact a place like vt or some place that will custom build a turbo cam for you
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
Right on, thanks guys! I love this forum!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Compression ratio w/supercharger
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compression Ratio | itschristorres8 | Engine | 22 | December 1st, 2007 01:46 PM |
| Compression Ratio | scxc15 | Modular Mustangs | 4 | September 24th, 2007 11:01 PM |
| compression ratio | mustangrebuilder | Classic Mustangs | 13 | August 14th, 2007 10:08 PM |
| compression ratio for 93' 5.0 V8 w/ modifications | kelbry | Engine | 4 | May 10th, 2007 10:37 PM |
| 96 gt compression ratio | 96_gt_stanger | 96-98 | 3 | March 2nd, 2007 11:52 PM |