| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
MM's Orangest
2004 Mach 1 Mustang
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,820
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Throttle Body
Alright I just ordered my RAI for my Mach and now I'm looking at throttle bodies. I didn't know if I should go with a 70mm or a 75mm. I've heard that 75 is too much for cars that aren't modified that much but I was assuming that to be a GT and I didn't know where a Mach fit in that. I have an exhaust and RAI that's it as far as performance mods. For those of you who might forget its a 4V not a 2.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
2003 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 551
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
if you plan on keep modding your car id go with the 75mm it shouldnt hurt you
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM's Orangest
2004 Mach 1 Mustang
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,820
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I don't know how much I'll mod it. When I get out of school I'll definitely mod the hell out of it, but for now it has to be dependable on the road. I won't do anything more than a tune, gears, and a throttle body. That is until something else that isn't major comes around and catches my eye. But no gas or S/C. I really want to keep it under 400hp to make sure the engine lasts.
Anyone have a good estimate of what I am at hp wise with an exhaust and an intake. Machs are sometimes rated at 320hp even though Ford said they are 305. I'm guessing I'm somewhere around 330-340, but I'm just guessing too. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 211
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
maybe at the flywheel..prolly lookin at around 285is at the wheels.. I have full exhaust, intake, and ud pullies with a dyno tune and hittin 298...
__________________
2001 Cobra....Steeda UDP - Steeda CAI - BBK LT headers - BBK Hpipe - SLP LM2's - Accufab tb - 4.10's - MGW Shifter Dyno Tune....#'s N/A= 308/306 75 shot N20= 374/403 |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,430
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
75? you will be looking at a twin 62 or twin 65. they are a double butterfly t/b's.
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,430
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
a twin 62 probably all you need for a while.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,430
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
the stock peice is twin 58's. the aftermarket is either 62 or 65. either one will work, up to him.
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,242
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
||
|
|
|
#13 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,430
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
the big oval
its kind of like the 70mm and 75mm debate on the gt's. both better than stock, but how much modding is going to get done for sure?
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2011 ram 1500 hemi
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: sylvan lake, alberta
Posts: 1,333
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i read a book on how to mod your mustang and they did dino tests on all the parts as they put them on, and the 70mm made more power than the 75mm with basic bolt ons. i guess it depends on what your goal is, eather way there both better than stock.
__________________
vmp500 hp. jba lts. powerhouse d/s Sold
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MM's Orangest
2004 Mach 1 Mustang
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,820
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Well I'm thinking of the here and now because there is no way I will be able to afford a S/C in the next few years. After I get my doctorate I shouldn't have a problem with buying a new TB. So would a 62 be better for now then?
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
|
||||
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Throttle Body
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Throttle Body | Snipe061 | V6 Mustangs | 8 | September 11th, 2007 04:28 PM |
| Throttle Body | autoranch | 96-98 | 4 | August 7th, 2007 09:24 PM |
| bbk throttle body | dumps | 2005 - 2010 | 4 | March 26th, 2007 08:02 PM |
| new throttle body? | AFtriathlete | General Tech | 18 | March 20th, 2007 01:14 AM |
| throttle body | noppe180 | 96-98 | 2 | November 4th, 2006 06:57 AM |